Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06699888

Effect of Cervicothoracic Junction Manipulation on Craniovertebral Angle and Proprioception in Forward Head Posture

The aim of this research is to find out the effect of Cervicothoracic Junction Manipulation on neck Proprioception in individuals with Forward Head Posture. A Randomized controlled trials done at Barki Advance Physiotherapy Center. The sample size was 36. The subjects were divided in two groups, 18 subjects in control group and 16 in experimental (Cervicothoracic Manipulation) group. Study duration is of 6 months after the ethical approval. Sampling technique applied was non probability connivance sampling technique. Only 18-45 years individuals with forward head posture, craniovertebral angle less than 53° degrees and Joint position error, an average of >4.5◦ error in rotation or extension direction were included. Tools used in the study are Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) and Joint Position Error Test (JPE).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Barki Rehabilitation Center

Multan, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan

About this study

FHP is greatly linked with multiple musculoskeletal conditions like head and neck dysfunction, myofascial trigger points, temporomandibular dysfunction, poor cervical mobility and functional disability of the cervical and thoracic spines. It also observed in asymptomatic individuals. Muscle spindles, especially in cervical detect muscle length changes and contribute to proprioception. Changes in neck muscles can disrupt proprioceptive function in the cervical spine. Proprioception is vital for joint function, providing stability during activities and informing posture and movement. Decreased balance and positioning errors are common in individuals with neck discomfort, emphasizing the importance of restoring proprioceptive function, particularly in Forward Head Posture (FHP) patients, for maintaining normal neck posture. Abnormalities in the head posture are absolutely harmful for the Head and neck posture. A study investigated the CV angle and joint position error in the cervical region and found a negative correlation between head posture and proprioceptive function, indicating that chronic abnormal head posture (FHP) negatively affects proprioception, body stability, and neck pain. Spinal manipulation uses high velocity and low amplitude thrusts to realign restricted vertebrae, removing restriction in facet joints, and producing mechanical, physiological, and biological effects.

Literature suggest that manipulation has beneficial effects in improving the pain and postural control in spine. The cervicothoracic (CT) junction is the transitional segment between the mobile lordotic cervical and less mobile kyphotic thoracic spines and hence a potential region for stiffness. The cervicothoracic junction, a potential stiffness region, can cause neck, headache, and upper limb pain. Improving its range of motion could reduce the need for compensatory movement, reducing cervical spine tension. According to recent systematic review, cervicothoracic junction level manual therapy in subjects with FHP better improved the muscle recruitment ability than upper-cervical level manual therapy during motor tasks. Upper thoracic spine manipulation has been shown to be more beneficial than thoracic mobilization, cervical mobilization, and standard care for FHP during performing motor task. In 2023 study conducted by Ibrahim et al. find out that FHP influenced Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory Processing in asymptomatic young adults and they reported 1-degree increase in the CVA measurement (indicating better posture) significantly decreased the amplitudes of all the potentials and resulted in a faster, more efficient nerve conduction time

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Both male and female patients with age between 18-45 years
  • Participants with asymptomatic Forward head posture
  • Participants having no active complain of neck pain and muscle stiffness
  • Joint position error, an average of >4.5◦ error in rotation or extension directions
  • For FHP patient, the Craniovertebral angle should be ≤ 53º

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous history of neck and head trauma
  • Vestibular pathologies i.e. vertigo, dizziness
  • Musculoskeletal or neurological conditions that could affect Proprioception, cognitive impairment
  • History of spinal and thoracic surgeries

Treatment and study plan

cervicothoracic manipulation group

Other

The participant lay prone with the head firmly into the head piece Palpation of the upper cervico-thoracic segment observed the side of the restriction.

The participants head was rotated to the contralateral side of the restriction. The practitioner's hand contacted the forehead and the other hand's thumb contacted the spinous process of the restricted side.

A low amplitude, high velocity thrust towards the axilla was applied, on the spinous process in PA direction.

Experimental group also received following exercises Chin tuck Strengthening Shoulder Retractors. Stretching SCM Pectoralis Stretch 3 × 10 repetitions, 3 times a week for 2 weeks

forward head correction exercises traditional group

Other

Chin tuck Strengthening Shoulder Retractors. Stretching SCM Pectoralis Stretch 3 × 10 repetitions, 3 times a week for 2 weeks.

Primary outcomes

  1. Craniovertebral Angle

    Time frame: baseline to 2 weeks

    The CV angle was measured for assessment of head posture. All subjects were instructed to stand in a self-selected comfortable upright posture. Then, the skin overlying the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra (C7) and tragus of the ear was marked. A lateral view digital photograph of each subject was taken. The CV angle was calculated based on the angle between a horizontal line passing through C7 and a line extending from the tragus of the ear to C7. The x-axis values for the craniovertebral angle were measured prior to movement.

  2. Joint Position Error Test

    Time frame: baseline to 2 weeks

    Proprioceptive accuracy, pertaining to the sense of joint and body movement and position, was evaluated using the Joint Position Error (JPE) Test. The Cervical JPE Test measures the ability of a blindfolded patient to accurately relocate their head position back to a predetermined neutral point after cervical joint movement

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Nov 21, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 18, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.