Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00345267

Effect of an Integrated Care Pathway on Asthma Care in Hospital

Integrated care pathways (ICP) coalesce medical and nursing work practices, unifying and directing care in line with current best practice and guidelines. We wish to examine the introduction of an ICP for children with wheeze/asthma admitted to our hospital. We will determine whether more rigid, but guided care results in faster recovery, quicker discharge with better education and fewer prescribing errors, but also determine whether staff feel alienated by the rigidity of practice, and parents perceive any benefit to the changes introduced.This will be a cluster randomised trial (random weeks) of standard or ICP care in 180 patients admitted to Sick Kids with wheeze/asthma. Parents will be asked to complete a questionnaire on admission and contacted at 10-14 days post discharge and asked to recall education provided at discharge; no other patient or parent intervention will be required.It is expected to take 40 weeks to recruit 180 patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

2 year–16 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dept of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Hospital for Sick Children

Edinburgh, Scotland, EH9 1LF, United Kingdom

About this study

Children admitted to hospital with wheeze/asthma are provided with care by a large number of clinicians with varying levels of skills and experiences. Providing a uniform, safe level of care, according to evidence based guidelines is challenging given the levels of experience within each hospital. Integrated care pathways are a multidisciplinary document incorporating medical, nursing, pharmacy and observational charts within a single chronological document. The study is to assess whether such documents can speed recovery and discharge, with care adhering more closely to evidence based guidelines for treatment and education. In addition we wish to assess patient safety (through prescribing errors) and parental and staff attitudes to the ICP introduction. Children arriving at the emergency department will be provided with care by either intergrated care pathway or standard care in 7 day clusters, randomised in 8 week blocks.

Comparison: We will compare the time from arrival at hospital to discharge from the ward as our primary outcome.

Other comparisons to be made for: Speed of recovery of heart rate and respiratory rate Time to require no supplemental oxygen Time to achieve 4 hourly spacing of bronchodilator Number and degree of prescribing errors Provision of education to parents Provision of care adhering to asthma guidelines (accurate discharge dose of prednisolone from emergency dept, use of multidose salbutamol rather than nebuliser) Number of clinical contacts required with patients Staff opinion of ICP before and after introduction Parental opinion of care in different groups Parental recall of advice/education provided to them during admission Possible Hawthorne effect during period of the study

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 2-16 years (inclusive) arriving at the Emergency Department with acute wheeze/asthma

Exclusion criteria

  • Children requiring high dependency care
  • Children with significant neurological or cardiac disease

Treatment and study plan

Integrated Care Pathway

Device

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of stay in hospital

Secondary outcomes

  1. Speed of recovery of heart rate and respiratory rate

  2. Time to require no supplemental oxygen

  3. Time to achieve 4 hourly spacing of bronchodilator

  4. Number and degree of prescribing errors

  5. Provision of education to parents

  6. Provision of care adhering to asthma guidelines (accurate discharge dose of prednisolone from emergency dept, use of multidose salbutamol rather than nebuliser)

  7. Number of clinical contacts required with patients

  8. Staff opinion of ICP before and after introduction

  9. Parental opinion of care in different groups

  10. Parental recall of advice/education provided to them during admission

  11. Possible Hawthorne effect during period of the study

  12. Parental recall of advice to contact primary care

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Edinburgh

Other

Collaborators

  • Edinburgh Sick Kids Friends Foundation
  • Roche Educational Grant

Registry information

Official study title

Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of the Effect of the Introduction of an Acute Wheeze/Asthma Integrated Care Pathway on Patient Outcome

Important dates

Study start
2004
Study completion
2005
First posted
Jun 28, 2006
Registry last updated
Jun 28, 2006

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.