University of Pécs
Pécs, 7621, Hungary
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07520877
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with survival highly dependent on the immediate initiation of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Early recognition, prompt chest compressions, and rapid defibrillation are critical components of the chain of survival. Telephone-assisted CPR (T-CPR) provided by emergency dispatchers has been shown to significantly increase bystander intervention rates and improve outcomes. While the availability and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) further enhance survival, the optimal integration of AED use into dispatcher-guided, single-rescuer scenarios remains insufficiently studied.
This prospective, randomized, controlled simulation study aims to evaluate the effect of modified telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) instructions optimized for automated external defibrillator (AED) use on no-flow time and chest compression fraction (CCF) during single-rescuer resuscitation. Participants are randomized to receive either standard T-CPR instructions or enhanced instructions focusing on minimizing interruptions in chest compressions and reducing time to first compression during AED use.
Interested in participating?
Request Info16 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pécs, 7621, Hungary
Location status: Recruiting
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health problem associated with low survival rates despite advances in emergency care systems. Survival is critically dependent on early recognition, immediate initiation of high-quality chest compressions, and timely defibrillation. Bystander intervention plays a pivotal role in this process, and telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) has been demonstrated to substantially increase the likelihood of CPR initiation prior to the arrival of emergency medical services.
The increasing availability of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in public spaces has further strengthened the chain of survival. Early defibrillation is a key determinant of favorable outcomes, particularly in shockable rhythms. However, the integration of AED use into dispatcher-assisted scenarios - especially when only a single rescuer is present - poses practical challenges. In such situations, the rescuer must balance multiple tasks, including chest compressions, AED retrieval, device preparation, and adherence to voice prompts, all of which may introduce interruptions in compressions and increase no-flow time.
While the benefits of T-CPR and AED use independently are well established, there is limited evidence on how dispatcher instructions can optimally coordinate these interventions in single-rescuer scenarios. In particular, it remains unclear whether modified, AED-optimized T-CPR instructions can reduce no-flow time and improve chest compression fraction (CCF) by minimizing unnecessary interruptions and optimizing task sequencing.
This prospective, randomized, controlled simulation study aims to evaluate the effect of modified telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) instructions optimized for automated external defibrillator (AED) use on no-flow time and chest compression fraction (CCF) during single-rescuer resuscitation. Participants are randomized to receive either standard T-CPR instructions or enhanced instructions focusing on minimizing interruptions in chest compressions and reducing time to first compression during AED use.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants receive structured telephone CPR instructions reflecting current national practice. AED retrieval is instructed early; however, no additional guidance is provided to optimize timing or minimize interruptions during AED use.
Participants receive standard T-CPR instructions supplemented with specific guidance aimed at:
Key elements include:
Time frame: During procedure.
Time without chest compressions measured from entry into the simulation (collapse recognition) until termination of the scenario (giving the third shock).
Time frame: During procedure.
The time (in seconds) until the first chest compression (measured from entering the scenario).
Time frame: During procedure
The time to the first shock by the AED (in seconds, from the time of entering the scenario).
Time frame: During procedure.
Proportion of time during which chest compressions are performed (until giving the third shock), calculated from the first chest compression until scenario termination.
Time frame: During procedure
The time without chest compression (in seconds) before and after giving the shock.
Time frame: Immediately after the CPR procedure (within 15 minutes)
Subjective feelings after performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation based on a short survey using Likert-scale based queries (1-4 points, lower numbers indicate worse, higher score indicates better opinion).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Pecs
Other
Effect of AED-optimized Telephone-assisted CPR Instructions on No-flow Time and Chest Compression Fraction in a Single-rescuer Cardiac Arrest Scenario - a Randomized-controlled Simulation Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07614074
Brain Diseases, Brain Injuries
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06526533
ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome), Acute Lung Injury
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07247669
Brain Diseases, Cardiac Arrest (CA)
Málaga, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07285915
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiovascular Diseases
Pilsen, Czech Republic, Czechia
View Trial Details