Ayse Betul Acar
Ankara, 06500, Turkey (Türkiye)
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07383558
This observational study aims to compare the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment applied to the posterior tibial nerve alone versus PRF applied to both the posterior tibial and sural nerves in patients with chronic plantar heel pain. Outcomes will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–65 year
All sexes
Observational
Ankara, 06500, Turkey (Türkiye)
Location status: Recruiting
Chronic plantar heel pain is a common condition frequently managed with interventional pain procedures. In routine clinical practice, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is commonly applied to the posterior tibial nerve under ultrasound guidance. In selected patients, PRF is additionally applied to the sural nerve based on clinical judgment.
This observational study includes patients who have already undergone PRF treatment as part of standard care in the Algology Clinic. Patients will not be randomized, and no modification to treatment plans will be made for study purposes. Patients will be divided into two groups: those who received PRF to the posterior tibial nerve alone, and those who received PRF to both the posterior tibial and sural nerves. Pain intensity and functional outcomes will be retrospectively evaluated and compared between groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Age between 18 and 65 years
Presence of chronic plantar heel pain
Baseline VAS score >5
Exclusion criteria
History of foot fracture or tumor
Pregnancy
Coagulopathy or use of antiplatelet therapy
Cognitive impairment preventing informed consent
Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency applied to the posterior tibial nerve, with or without additional application to the sural nerve.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post-procedure
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is a simple tool used in clinical trials to measure pain intensity. Patients rate their pain on a scale, typically from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). It provides a quick, quantitative assessment of subjective pain and is commonly used to evaluate treatment effectiveness before and after intervention.Change in pain intensity assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post-procedure
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score is a clinical outcome measure used to assess foot and ankle conditions. It combines pain (40 points), function (50 points), and alignment (10 points) into a total score out of 100. Higher scores indicate better clinical status. It is frequently used in clinical trials to evaluate surgical or conservative treatment outcomes.
Diskapi Teaching and Research Hospital
Other
Does Targeting the Sural Nerve in Addition to the Posterior Tibial Nerve Increase the Effectiveness of Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Chronic Plantar Heel Pain?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07463794
Bone Diseases, Calcaneal Spur
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07204210
Bone Diseases, Exostoses
Kayseri, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06533683
Bone Diseases, Calcaneal Spur
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT00189592
Bone Diseases, Exostoses
Des Plaines, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details