Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03816774

Effect of Adding Simethicone to Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation in a Screening Colonoscopy Setting

Colonoscopy is currently accepted as the gold standard in screening, surveillance and prevention for colorectal cancer (CRC), and therefore, its quality is a major priority.

The quality of colonoscopy is greatly dependent on the quality of the bowel preparation. Standard bowel cleansing includes a low-fibre diet on the day preceding the exam and a split regimen of 4 litres of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution.

In order to improve bowel cleansing some additional measures are available. Simethicone is an inexpensive and safe antifoaming agent that reduces the surface tension of air bubbles, theoretically presenting several benefits such as increased tolerability to the preparation, thereby improving the quality of the preparation and, secondly, adenoma detection (ADR) and cecal intubation rates (CIR). However, its role remains controversial, with some publications supporting its administration and others failing to demonstrate clear benefits.

The main aim of this study is to assess if addition of simethicone to a split-dose cleansing regimen of 4 litres of PEG improves adequate bowel preparation rate.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year–74 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Portuguese Oncology Institute - Coimbra

Coimbra, 3001-651, Portugal

About this study

a. Study type: Endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial i. Prospective inclusion of patients scheduled for a colonoscopy by nationwide CRC screening program after a positive faecal immunochemical test.

ii. Randomization by computer generated tables. iii. Allocation concealment by sealed, opaque envelopes. iv. Endoscopist-blinded: endoscopist blinded to the group allocation. v. Patient informed about its bowel cleansing regimen.

b. Selection participant method: i. Inclusion by invitation of patients aged between 50 and 74 years, inclusive, scheduled for colonoscopy by nationwide CRC screening program after a positive faecal immunochemical test. ii. Exclusion criteria for nationwide CRC screening program: previous diagnosis of CRC, presence of known genetic susceptibility syndromes related with CRC, personal history of inflammatory bowel disease, presence of gastrointestinal complaints (significant changes in gastrointestinal transit in the last 6 months or evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding), a normal colonoscopy in the last 10 years and a normal flexible sigmoidoscopy in the last 5 years. Exclusion criteria of this study also include: known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation, toxic megacolon, major colonic resection, pregnant or at risk of becoming pregnant and lactating women, known or suspected hypersensitivity to the active or other ingredients.

c. Sample size: i. 412 (2 groups of 206 patients). ii. To improve adequate bowel preparation rate (primary outcome) from 85% (value from the investigator's own database) to 95% (target standard suggested by ESGE) and assuming a normal distribution and a power of 90% (α=0.05), the calculated sample size of each of the 2 groups was 188; allowing for a 10% dropout rate, the sample size is 206 per group (412 patients overall). Adequate bowel preparation is defined as total. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ≥6 and ≥2 in each segment. The chosen scale is the most systematically validated and appropriate for the clinical setting.

d. Procedures and data collection methods: Form sheets filled by the endoscopist about intraprocedural measures and by the nurse about patient compliance and tolerability to the prescribed cleansing regimen.

e. Analysed variables: i. Primary outcome: adequate bowel preparation rate. ii. Secondary outcomes: ADR, CIR, compliance and tolerability related to the bowel cleansing regimen. iii. Patient characteristics and other variables: age, gender, degree of mucosal bubble reported by a comprehensive scoring used by previous studies (grade 0: no bubbles; 1: minimal or occasional bubbles (must be actively sought); 2: moderate or obviously present; 3: severe or so many bubbles that vision is obscured), withdrawal time, polyp detection rate and complications rate.

f. Statistical analysis: i. Performed using statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. ii. Continuous variables are reported as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range, if they have normal or not normal distribution, respectively; categorical variables as absolute and relative frequency. iii. Continuous variables are compared between two groups using Student's T test if they have a normal distribution and homogeneity of variance or Mann-Whitney U if these conditions are not met. Categorical variables are compared using Pearson's X2 test or Fisher test. iv. All hypotheses are two-tailed and a P-value<0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • consecutive patients scheduled for colonoscopy by nationwide CRC screening program after a positive faecal immunochemical test,
  • signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • previous diagnosis of CRC,
  • presence of known genetic susceptibility syndromes related with CRC,
  • personal history of inflammatory bowel disease,
  • presence of gastrointestinal complaints (significant changes in gastrointestinal transit in the last 6 months or evidence of gastrointestinal bleeding),
  • a normal colonoscopy in the last 10 years and a normal flexible sigmoidoscopy in the last 5 years,
  • known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation, toxic megacolon, major colonic resection,
  • pregnant or at risk of becoming pregnant and lactating women,
  • known or suspected hypersensitivity to the active or other ingredients.

Treatment and study plan

PEG split-dose and simethicone

Drug

Patients in active comparator arm are instructed to take 250mg simethicone pill 15 minutes before PEG dose on the previous evening plus 250mg simethicone pill 15 minutes before PEG dose ending 3 hours before colonoscopy

Other names: Aero-OM

Primary outcomes

  1. Adequate bowel preparation rate

    Time frame: 1 day (during colonoscopy)

    Total BBPS ≥6 and ≥2 in each segment (ascendent, transverse, descendent), presented as percentage.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adenoma detection rate

    Time frame: Within 30 days from colonoscopy date

    Colonoscopies with at least one adenoma identified, presented as percentage.

  2. Cecal intubation rate

    Time frame: 1 day (during colonoscopy)

    Photo documentation of the cecum is a mark for effective total colonoscopy, presented as percentage.

  3. Compliance to the bowel cleansing regimen

    Time frame: 1 day (immediately before colonoscopy)

    Patient assessment, by written questionnaire, of compliance of the bowel cleansing regimen.

  4. Tolerability to the bowel cleansing regimen:questionnaire

    Time frame: 1 day (immediately before colonoscopy)

    Patient assessment, by written questionnaire, of side effects of the bowel cleansing regimen.

Other outcomes

  1. Degree of mucosal bubble

    Time frame: 1 day (during colonoscopy)

    Degree of mucosal bubble in each colonic segment (ascendent, transverse, descendent) reported by a comprehensive scoring used by previous studies (grade 0: no bubbles; 1: minimal or occasional bubbles (must be actively sought); 2: moderate or obviously present; 3: severe or so many bubbles that vision is obscured).

  2. Withdrawal time

    Time frame: 1 day (during colonoscopy)

    Time spent on withdrawal of the endoscope from cecum to anal canal and inspection of the entire bowel mucosa at negative (no biopsy or therapy) colonoscopy, presented in minutes.

  3. Polyp detection rate

    Time frame: Within 30 days from colonoscopy date

    Colonoscopies with a detection of at least one polyp, presented as percentage.

  4. Patients characteristics questionnaire

    Time frame: 1 day (immediately before colonoscopy)

    Evaluate, using proper data collecting sheet, patient relevant data (age, gender, chronic medication, risk factors for inappropriate preparation)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Adding Simethicone to a Split Regimen of Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Colonoscopy Setting: an Endoscopist-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jan 25, 2019
Registry last updated
Oct 5, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.