Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07103798

Effect of a Microprocessor-controlled Prosthetic Knee Joint on K2 Level Ambulators

Microprocessor-controlled knees (MPKs) automatically adjust resistance or damping in the joint to improve swing- and/or stance-phase control as appropriate for the prosthesis user during gait. The purpose of this proposed investigation is to determine if there are substantial physical and psychological benefits to fitting lower functioning Veteran ambulators having transfemoral amputations with an MPK compared with a nonmicroprocessor-controlled knee (NMPK). Using a repeated-measures, cross-sectional experimental design, approximately 20 Veterans with unilateral, transfemoral amputations will be evaluated on two separate occasions at the Jesse Brown VA Medical Center or the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, first with their conventional NMPK and then again after a 2-month accommodation period with the College Park Icon MPK.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

45 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, Chicago, Illinois, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Limb loss is a potentially devastating event in a person's life, often resulting in profound physical, psychological, and vocational consequences. A transfemoral amputation results in greater physical and functional impairment and an increased risk of falling in patients as compared to someone with a transtibial amputation. Furthermore, balance confidence and fear of falling appears to be a persistent and pervasive problem among lower-limb prosthesis users, which adversely affects mobility and quality of life. During the past 30 years there have been several major developments in prosthetic knee mechanisms that incorporate microprocessors to improve swing-phase characteristics and provide greater stability during stance phase. Microprocessor-controlled knees (MPKs) automatically adjust resistance or damping in the joint to improve swing- and/or stance-phase control as appropriate for the user during gait.

There are numerous reported benefits of MPKs over non-microprocessor controlled knees (NMPKs), including faster self-selected walking speeds, reduced cognitive burden while walking, fewer stumbles and falls, and increased perceptions of confidence and safety while ambulating. Nonetheless, MPKs are not typically prescribed or fitted on lower functioning ambulators, which is the activity classification of most Veteran patients.

The purpose of this proposed investigation is to determine if there are substantial physical and psychological benefits to fitting lower functioning Veteran ambulators having transfemoral amputations with an MPK compared with a NMPK. The specific aims and hypotheses of this project are:

Aim 1: To determine the effects of the College Park Icon on the mobility of unilateral, transfemoral prosthesis users. The investigators hypothesize that the MPK will enable users to 1) increase their freely-selected (i.e., normal) walking speed, and 2) walk over a wider range of speeds. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that 3) participants will report fewer falls with the MPK.

Aim 2: To determine the effects of the College Park Icon on the psychological well-being of unilateral, transfemoral prosthesis users. The investigators hypothesize that subjects will improve their scores on patient-reported outcome assessments including the ABC, OPUS, and PLUS-M with the MPK.

Aim 3: To determine subjects' preference for the College Park Icon compared to their conventional NMPK. At the completion of the study, the investigators will ask participants which prosthetic knee type they preferred. It's hypothesized that the majority of participants will prefer using the MPK over the NMPK. Those subjects who prefer the MPK will be permitted to keep the component in their prosthesis, while those who prefer their NMPK will have their prosthesis returned to its original configuration.

Using a cross-sectional experimental design, approximately 20 Veterans who are low functioning ambulators with unilateral, transfemoral amputations will be evaluated on two separate occasions at the Jesse Brown VA Medical Center or the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, first with their conventional NMPK and then again after a two-month accommodation period with the College Park Icon MPK.

This work is directly applicable to VHA's Patient Care Mission because the results may justify the fitting of MPKs on low-level ambulators within the VA system and substantially improve the mobility of Veterans with lower limb amputations while increasing their quality of life.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Unilateral, transfemoral amputation (any etiology).
  • Age from 45-85 years.
  • Residual limb length classified as standard (i.e., medium) to long.
  • Prosthesis user for at least 1 year prior to enrolling in the study.
  • K2-level classification while using their NMPK.
  • Good sensation on their residual limb.
  • Good skin integrity upon visual inspection.
  • Presents with good socket fit based upon a standard assessment by the study prosthetist.

Exclusion criteria

  • Bilateral leg amputations.
  • Individuals with a knee disarticulation.

Treatment and study plan

College Park ICON

Other

Subjects will be fitted and trained on the College Park ICON MPK. An accommodation period of 2 months will be provided prior to evaluation with the knee joint.

Conventional NMPK

Other

Subjects will be tested walking with their conventional, mechanical prosthetic knee prior to being fitted with the MPK.

Primary outcomes

  1. Walking speed

    Time frame: To be measured before and immediately following the 2-month accommodation period of wearing the MPK.

    Walking speed will be measured as participants walk on level ground at slow, normal and fast speeds.

  2. Falls during walking

    Time frame: To be determined before and during the 2-month accommodation period of wearing the MPK

    The number of falls that occur while the subject is walking will be recorded in a daily diary.

  3. PLUS-M

    Time frame: To be measured before and immediately following the 2-month accommodation period of wearing the MPK.

    The Prosthetic Limb User Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M) will be used to determine the mobility of subjects before and after fitting with the MPK. Scores range from 12-60 points, and a higher score indicates greater mobility.

  4. Prosthetic Knee Preference

    Time frame: To be asked immediately following the 2-month accommodation period of wearing the MPK.

    Subjects will be asked which prosthetic knee they prefer at the completion of the study. For those that indicate preference for the MPK, they will be permitted to keep it in their prosthesis. For those that prefer the NMPK, their prosthesis will be restored to the configuration prior to beginning the study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. ABC Scale

    Time frame: To be administered before and immediately following the 2-month accommodation period of wearing the MPK.

    The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale measures the subject's confidence in not losing their balance or becoming unsteady while performing different activities. Scores range from 0-100%, where zero represents no confidence and 100 represents complete confidence in performing an activity without losing balance or becoming unsteady.

  2. OPUS

    Time frame: To be administered before and immediately following the 2-month accommodation period of wearing the MPK.

    The Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey (OPUS) is a self-report questionnaire that can be used for quality assessment, to maintain awareness of improvement in activities, to evaluate changes in patient's functional status and quality of life, and to assess satisfaction with devices and services. Scores range from 0-80 points, with a higher score indicating greater functional mobility.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Rebecca Stine, MS

CONTACT

[email protected]

(312) 503-5726

Steven A Gard, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

(312) 503-5718

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Fed

Registry information

Official study title

Does a Microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knee Joint Improve Mobility and Quality of Life in K2-Level Veteran Ambulators?

Acronym: MPK-K2

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Aug 5, 2025
Registry last updated
May 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.