Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05574218

Effect of a Maintenance Protocol After Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis

This study was designed as a 12-month, two arms, randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a supportive treatment protocol (SPIT). Thirty patients were randomized, six months after access-flap surgery, in two different SPIT groups. After ultrasonic debridement, the affected implant surfaces of the test group were treated with glycine powder air-polishing, while implants in the control group a rubber cup and polishing paste was used. Maintenance visits were carried every 3 months and clinical, radiological, microbiological and biochemical variables were registered at baseline (6 months after surgery) and after a follow-up period of 12 months (18 months after surgery).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Study design:

This study was designed as a 12-month, two arms, RCT to evaluate the efficacy of a SPIC protocol. Thirty patients were randomized, six months after access-flap surgery, in two different SPIT groups. After ultrasonic debridement, the affected implant surfaces of the test group were treated with glycine powder air-polishing, while implants in the control group a rubber cup and polishing paste was used. Maintenance visits were carried every 3 months and clinical, radiological, microbiological and biochemical variables were registered at baseline (6 months after surgery) and after a follow-up period of 12 months (18 months after surgery).

Interventions:

At the 6-month evaluation after the surgery, the baseline data for the present study were obtained and patients were randomised using a computerized block randomization protocol to one of the following SPIC protocols. In the test group, implant surfaces were treated with glycine powder air-polishing after ultrasonic instrumentation; the specific nozzle was activated subgingivally and circumferentially around the implant for 1 minute. In the control group, implants were cleaned with a rubber cup and polishing paste after ultrasonic instrumentation. This SPIC visits were carried out at 6 (baseline visit), 9, 12, 15 and 18 months after surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of at least one implant with peri-implantitis, defined as: radiographic evidence of bone loss >2 mm, inflammation of the peri-implant mucosa as defined by positive BoP and/or suppuration, and at least one site with PD ≥ 5 mm.
  • Based on the radiographic examination, the affected implant should not have a vertical peri-implant defect. Positive selection was based on the presence of pe-ri-implant lesions wider than 4 mm, with an angle greater than 35 º.
  • In patients with a history of periodontitis, periodontal therapy should have been provided at least 6 months prior to the initiation of the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of relevant medical conditions and/or systemic medications that would contraindicate the surgical procedure or modify the tissue response after therapy.
  • Patients requiring antibiotic prophylaxis.
  • Heavy smokers (> 10 cigarettes/day).
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Treatment and study plan

Glycine air powder

Procedure

Every 3 months, ultrasonic instrumentation was carried out with an specific implant tip coated with Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK), activated subgingivally and circumferentially around the implant. Then, the implants were treated with glycine powder air-polishing.

Rubber Cup Polishing

Procedure

Every 3 months, ultrasonic instrumentation was carried out with an specific implant tip coated with Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK), activated subgingivally and circumferentially around the implant. Then, the implants were treated with rubber cup and a polishing paste.

Primary outcomes

  1. Probing Pocket Depth

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Changes in Probing Pocket Depth measured in milimeters with a manual periodontal probe

Secondary outcomes

  1. Distance of Gingival Recession

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Recession distance of the mucosal margin relative to the restoration margin (REC) at the implant (6 sites/implant) measured in milimeters with a manual periodontal probe

  2. Bleeding on Probing index

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Rate of Presence / absence Bleeding on Probing at the implant (6 sites/implant)

  3. Plaque Index

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Rate of Presence / absence of Plaque at the implant (6 sites/implant)

  4. Suppuration Index

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Rate of Presence / absence of suppuration at the implant (6 sites/implant)

  5. Radiographic bone loss distance measured from the prosthetic connection platform to the bottom of the intraosseous defect

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Intraoral standardised radiographs of the site of interest measured in digital intraoral radiographs using an image-processing software

  6. Concentration of the selected cytokines measured in pg/ml (IL1B; Il-6; IL-8; Tumoral Necrosis Factor Alpha)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Samples taken from the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were taken from each included implant from the deepest PD site with positive BoP, at baseline and at the final evaluation, always prior to microbiological sampling. Samples were taken using the filter paper technique. After isolation of the area with cotton rolls and gentle cleaning with air and a gauze to remove supragingival biofilm deposits and potential saliva contamination, a paper strip of standard length and height was inserted into the peri-implant pocket, until mild resistance was felt and left in place for 30 seconds. The soaked volume of GCF was measured using the Periotron 8000® device. Subsequently, the paper strips were inserted in micro-centrifuge plastic tubes and immediately stored at -80°C until further processing. Analyses were carried out using a Luminex System (Luminex® 200, Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA) to determine volume of the following biomarkers: IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α.

  7. Presence of putative periodontal pathogens

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Sample from the deepest site in the evaluated implant using two consecutive sterile paper-points kept in place for 10 seconds and then transferred into a screw-capped vial, containing 1.5 mL of reduced transport fluid (RTF). Samples were transferred to the microbiological laboratory within 2 hours and homogenized by vortexing for 30 seconds and serially diluted in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Then, 0.1 mL of each dilution was plated manually on the specific medium Dentaid-1, for the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and incubated for 3 days in air with 5% CO2 at 37ºC. Samples were also plated into a non-selective blood agar plate, supplemented with haemine (5 mg/l), menadione (1 mg/l) and 5% sterile horse blood, with 7-14 days of anaerobic incubation.

  8. Frequency of detection of putative periodontal pathogens

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Sample from the deepest site in the evaluated implant using two consecutive sterile paper-points kept in place for 10 seconds and then transferred into a screw-capped vial, containing 1.5 mL of reduced transport fluid (RTF). Samples were transferred to the microbiological laboratory within 2 hours and homogenized by vortexing for 30 seconds and serially diluted in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Then, 0.1 mL of each dilution was plated manually on the specific medium Dentaid-1, for the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and incubated for 3 days in air with 5% CO2 at 37ºC. Samples were also plated into a non-selective blood agar plate, supplemented with haemine (5 mg/l), menadione (1 mg/l) and 5% sterile horse blood, with 7-14 days of anaerobic incubation.

  9. Proportions of putative periodontal pathogens

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Sample from the deepest site in the evaluated implant using two consecutive sterile paper-points kept in place for 10 seconds and then transferred into a screw-capped vial, containing 1.5 mL of reduced transport fluid (RTF). Samples were transferred to the microbiological laboratory within 2 hours and homogenized by vortexing for 30 seconds and serially diluted in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Then, 0.1 mL of each dilution was plated manually on the specific medium Dentaid-1, for the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and incubated for 3 days in air with 5% CO2 at 37ºC. Samples were also plated into a non-selective blood agar plate, supplemented with haemine (5 mg/l), menadione (1 mg/l) and 5% sterile horse blood, with 7-14 days of anaerobic incubation.

  10. Counts of putative periodontal pathogens

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 18 months after the surgical procedure

    Sample from the deepest site in the evaluated implant using two consecutive sterile paper-points kept in place for 10 seconds and then transferred into a screw-capped vial, containing 1.5 mL of reduced transport fluid (RTF). Samples were transferred to the microbiological laboratory within 2 hours and homogenized by vortexing for 30 seconds and serially diluted in phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Then, 0.1 mL of each dilution was plated manually on the specific medium Dentaid-1, for the detection of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and incubated for 3 days in air with 5% CO2 at 37ºC. Samples were also plated into a non-selective blood agar plate, supplemented with haemine (5 mg/l), menadione (1 mg/l) and 5% sterile horse blood, with 7-14 days of anaerobic incubation.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of a Maintenance Protocol Based on the Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis and Implant Surface Decontamination With Glycine Powder Air-polishing

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Oct 10, 2022
Registry last updated
Oct 10, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.