usual care and follow-up by a nurse
Otherfollow-up by a nurse and referral to a specialist(s) according to symptoms
NCT Number: NCT05787366
People with persistent symptoms of covid-19 have increased needs for needs for management of their overall health (physical, psychological and social). Persistent covid-19 symptoms have a negative impact on quality of life. By proposing a follow-up and an intervention on the reduction of these symptoms, the symptoms, the study will improve quality of life.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Urps Medecins Libéraux Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Lyon, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
follow-up by a nurse and referral to a specialist(s) according to symptoms
The content of the intervention is defined according to the result of the initial assessment in relation to the person's needs and the nature of his or her persistent symptoms. The patient, depending on his or her needs, may choose to participate in the following workshops :
Time frame: at the end of the 6-month follow-up
measurement of quality of life at the end of the 6-month follow-up assess by the SF-36 questionnaire. This questionnaire has eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in health. Each question is evaluated on a Likert scale, with 3, 5 or 6 levels of possible answers. The 8 dimensions are also used to calculate two quality of life scores for individuals: the physical composite score (PCS) and the mental composite score (MCS). The higher the score, the greater the ability.
Time frame: at 3 months
Measuring the impact on quality of life assess by the SF-36 questionnaire. This questionnaire has eight health concepts: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations due to physical health problems, role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, emotional well-being, social functioning, energy/fatigue, and general health perceptions. It also includes a single item that provides an indication of perceived change in health. Each question is evaluated on a Likert scale, with 3, 5 or 6 levels of possible answers. The 8 dimensions are also used to calculate two quality of life scores for individuals: the physical composite score (PCS) and the mental composite score (MCS). The higher the score, the greater the ability.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
Measuring the impact on frailty by Fried frailty phenotype which assess 5 dimensions : Denutrition, Fatigue, Muscle weakness, Slowing down, Low level of physical activity.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
Measuring the impact on comorbidities by Charlson comorbidity index. Each comorbidity category has an associated weight (from 1 to 6), based on the adjusted risk of mortality or resource use, and the sum of all the weights results in a single comorbidity score for a patient. A score of zero indicates that no comorbidities were found.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
Measuring the impact on dyspnea symptoms with The Medical Research Council modified dyspnea scale. It is used to subjectively grade the severity of dyspnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ranged 0-4).The higher the stage, the more severe the dyspnea.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
Measuring the impact on hyperventilation symptoms with the Nijmegen score. It is a score with sixteen items ranked from 0 (never occurs) to 4 (occurs, very often). A score ≥ 23/64 is suggestive of hyperventilation.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
Measuring the impact on fatigue symptoms with the Chadler fatigue scale. This is a 11-item scale divided into two components that measures physical fatigue and mental fatigue. Respondents can give a score of 0 to 3 to indicate how each statement applies to them, from "less than usual" to "much more than usual. The scores for each item are then summed to produce an overall score (ranged 0 to 33). Higher the score is, higher the fatigue is.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
Measuring the impact on neuropathic pain symptoms with the DN4 questionnaire. At the end of the questionnaire, add up the 'yes' answers giving a total score out of 10. If the patients score is greater than or equal to 4, the test indicates that the patient is likely to be suffering from neuropathic pain.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
Measuring the impact on cognitive impairment symptoms with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. A maximum score out of 30 points will thus be obtained. Smaller the score is, higher the cognitive impairment is.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
Measuring the impact on musculoskeletal disorders symptoms with Nordic style questionnaire. The Nordic questionnaire is made up of closed questions, and can be used as a self-questionnaire or an interview. The questionnaire was created to answer the following question: "Does an osteoarticular pathology exist in the given population and if so, which body region does it affect?". Based on this idea, the questionnaire includes a diagram of the human body seen from behind, divided into nine anatomical regions. The question "have you at any time during the last 12 months or 7 days had a problem (pain, discomfort, discomfort)?" is asked for each anatomical region.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
Measuring the impact on post-exertional malaise. It consist of 10 questions with a Likert scale. Each question is said to be positive when the two associated scores (severity and frequency) are ≥ 2. Active post-exertional malaise are said to be present when at least one of the 5 situations questioned is positive.
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
impact on anxiety and drepssion via the HAD questionnaire. It includes 14 items rated from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D), thus making it possible to obtain two scores (maximum score for each score = 21)
Time frame: at 3 and 6 months
Evaluation of the obstacles and levers to participation and adherence to the intervention, as well as the satisfaction of patients and professionals via semi-directive interviews conducted by a sociologist during the implementation of the intervention
Time frame: at 6 months
Assess the effectivness of the system through a cost-utility analysis
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Other
Acronym: SPACO+
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05078905
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07215520
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07709637
COVID-19, COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2 Infection)
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT05877534
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, COVID-19
Stockholm, Sweden
View Trial Details