Custom-made foot orthoses Versus a flat insole
DeviceCompare the use of plantar orthoses (experimental group) with the use of a flat insoles (control group)
NCT Number: NCT03996980
Excessive foot pronation has been recognized as being linked to chronic low back pain (CLBP). The use of compensating custom-made foot orthoses has not been entirely explored as an effective therapy for CLBP Objective: to investigate the effects of wearing custom made foot orthoses compared to placebo orthoses in patients with pronated feet and chronic low back pain (CLBP).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Manuel Pabón Carrasco, Seville, Spain
Excessive foot pronation has been recognized as being linked to CLBP. Foot hyperpronation may cause malalignment of the lower extremity.There is a wide variety of treatments for CLBP, and it is suggested that excessive pronation of the foot has been linked to CLBP.The use of compensating custom-made foot orthoses has not been entirely explored as an effective therapy for CLBP.
Customized foot orthoses alter the position of the foot during weight-bearing. The goal is to eliminate compensation of the foot due to structural deformity or misalignment and redistribute abnormal plantar pressures.Custom-made foot orthoses may contribute to improving chronic low back pain. This question represents an important benefit for patients and for the public health system by reducing expensive treatments, such as surgery or long periods of rehabilitation
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Compare the use of plantar orthoses (experimental group) with the use of a flat insoles (control group)
Time frame: Baseline
This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your back or leg pain is affecting your ability to manage in everyday life.The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools 0% to 20%: minimal disability: The patient can cope with most living activities.
21%-40%: moderate disability: The patient experiences more pain and difficulty with sitting, lifting and standing. Travel and social life are more difficult and they may be disabled from work. Personal care, sexual activity and sleeping are not grossly affected and the patient can usually be managed by conservative means. 41%-60%: severe disability: Pain remains the main problem in this group but activities of daily living are affected. These patients require a detailed investigation. 61%-80%: crippled: Back pain impinges on all aspects of the patient's life. Positive intervention is required. 81%-100%: These patients are either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline
10 visual analogue scale (VAS).The findings suggested that 10 VAS ratings of no pain (0-2), mild pain(2-4), moderate pain (4-7), and severe pain (7-10)
Time frame: At the moment of inclusion in the study
Foot posture was assessed by a podiatrist during the biomechanical assessment based on the six-item foot posture index (FPI≥+6). The FPI consists of six validated items that are measured in a relaxed standing position of the subject. Each item is assessed on a -2 to +2 scale, where -2 indicates a supinated position, 0 indicates a neutral position and +2 indicates a pronated position, depending on the specific item. The sum of the scores of the six items provides a total score ranging from -12 to +12.
Time frame: at the end of the study, approximately 4 weeks
Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire (ODI) for chronic low back pain
Time frame: At 4 weeks after baseline
VAS scale for CLBP
Using a ruler, the score is determined by mea-suring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-10. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
University of Seville
Other
Effect Mechanism of Custom-made Foot Orthoses on Foot Pronation Subjects and Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07727525
Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07694219
Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain
Lahore, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06810245
Agnosia, Arthritis
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04747314
Anxiety Disorders, Back Pain
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details