Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02963935

Effect and Safety of Liraglutide 3.0 mg as an Adjunct to Intensive Behaviour Therapy for Obesity in a Non-specialist Setting

This trial is conducted in the United States of America (USA). The purpose of the trial is to investigate the effect and safety of liraglutide 3.0 mg as an adjunct to intensive behaviour therapy for obesity in a non-specialist setting (IBT-CMS: Intensive Behaviour Therapy for obesity in a primary care setting according to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) visit schedule).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novo Nordisk Investigational Site, Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial
  • BMI above or equal to 30 kg/m^2
  • Male or female, age 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) above or equal to 6.5% (at screening visit), or diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Recent history of cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction or stroke within the past 6 months), severe congestive heart failure (NYHA class III, IV), or second degree or greater heart block
  • Personal or family history of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma (MTC), or Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 2 (MEN2)
  • Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method (adequate contraceptive measure as required by local regulation or practice)
  • Use in past 90 days of medications known to induce significant weight loss (e.g., prescription weight loss medications) or weight gain (e.g., chronic use of oral steroids, second generation antipsychotics)
  • History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic)
  • History of major depressive disorder within the past 2 years
  • Any lifetime history of a suicide attempt
  • Inadequately treated blood pressure defined as Grade 3 hypertension or higher (Systolic above or equal to 180 mmHg or diastolic above or equal to 110 mmHg)
  • History of malignancy (except for non-melanoma skin cancer) within the past 5 years

Treatment and study plan

liraglutide

Drug

Administered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily for 56 weeks. Dose gradually increased to 3.0 mg

Placebo

Drug

Administered subcutaneously (s.c., under the skin) once daily for 56 weeks. Dose gradually increased to 3.0 mg

CMS Intensive Behavior Therapy

Behavioral

Intensive Behaviour Therapy for obesity

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Weight (%)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to week 56 was evaluated for two different observation periods. In-trial observation period: the uninterrupted time interval from the date of randomisation until and including the date of the follow-up visit or date of last contact. On-drug observation period: includes all time intervals in which subjects are considered to be on treatment from the date of first trial product administration to 7 days (or 14 days for AEs) after the final trial product administration, excluding potential off-treatment time intervals triggered by at least 7 consecutive missed doses (or 14 consecutive missed doses for AEs).

    The test of superiority of liraglutide to placebo for the treatment policy estimand was tested in a hierarchical manner for the two primary and the consequent 7 confirmatory secondary endpoints presented.

  2. Proportion of Subjects Losing at Least 5% of Baseline Body Weight at Week 56

    Time frame: Week 56

    The estimated mean percentage of subjects losing at least 5% of baseline body weight at week 56 is presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on in-trial data and on-drug data.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Subjects Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Body Weight at Week 56

    Time frame: Week 56

    The estimated mean percentage of subjects losing more than 10% of baseline body weight at week 56 is presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on in-trial data and on-drug data.

  2. Proportion of Subjects Losing More Than 15% of Baseline Body Weight at Week 56

    Time frame: Week 56

    The estimated mean percentage of subjects losing more than 15% of baseline body weight at week 56 is presented. The endpoint was evaluated based on in-trial data and on-drug data.

  3. Proportion of Subjects Losing 4% or More of Baseline Body Weight

    Time frame: Week 16

    The estimated mean percentage of subjects losing 4% or more of baseline body weight at week 16 is presented. The endpoint was evaluated for treatment policy estimand (in-trial data).

  4. Change in Waist Circumference (cm)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in waist circumference. The endpoint was evaluated based on in-trial data and on-drug data.

  5. Change in Short Form-36 (SF-36) v2.0 Acute, Physical Functioning Score

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the subject's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

    SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in SF-36 physical functioning score is presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on in-trial data and on-drug data.

  6. Change in IWQoL-Lite for CT, Physical Function Domain (5-items) Score

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trials Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT ) score. IWQoL-Lite for CT (Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version) is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life.

    The endpoint was evaluated based on in-trial data and on-drug data.

  7. Change in Six Minutes Walking Distance Test (6MWT)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in 6 minutes walking distance test. The 6MWT is a common test of functional exercise capacity that assesses the distance a subject can walk in 6 minutes. The endpoint was evaluated based on in-trial data and on-drug data.

  8. Change From Baseline in HbA1c (%)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline to week 56 in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  9. Change From Baseline in FPG (mg/dL)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline (week 0) in fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  10. Change From Baseline sBP (mmHg)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to week 56.

  11. Change From Baseline dBP (mmHg)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in diastolic blood pressure (dBP). Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  12. Change From Baseline in Lipids -Total Cholesterol

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in total cholesterol (TC). Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  13. Change From Baseline in Lipids - LDL Cholesterol

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in low density cholesterol (LDL) from baseline (week 0) to week 56. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  14. Change From Baseline in Lipids - HDL Cholesterol

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in high density (HDL) cholesterol from baseline (week 0) to week 56. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  15. Change From Baseline in Lipids - VLDL Cholesterol

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in very low density cholesterol (VLDL) from baseline (week 0) to week 56. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  16. Change From Baseline in Lipids - TG

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in triglyceride (TG) from baseline (week 0) to week 56. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  17. Change From Baseline in Lipids - FFA

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in free fatty acids (FFA) from baseline (week 0) to week 56. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  18. Change in Short Form-36 v2.0 Acute (SF-36) (Subdomains)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the subject's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

    SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in in the sub-domain scores is presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are evaluated based on in-trial data.

  19. Change in Short Form-36 v2.0 Acute (SF-36) (Physical Component Summary (PCS))

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain physical component summary (PCS). SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) score is presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on in-trial data and on-drug data.

  20. Change in Short Form-36 v2.0 Acute (SF-36) (Mental Component Summary (MCS)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in short form 36 v2.0 acute domain mental component summary (MCS). SF-36v2™ questionnaire measured the HRQoL on 8 domains on individual scale ranges. The scores 0-100 (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. A norm-based score of 50 corresponds to the mean score and 10 corresponds to the standard deviation of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline in SF-36 mental component summary is presented. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on in-trial data and on-drug data.

  21. Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT): Pain/Discomfort Domain Score

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT) domain pain and discomfort. IWQoL-Lite for CT (Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version) is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  22. Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT): Psychosocial Domain Score

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT) psychosocial domain. IWQoL-Lite for CT (Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version) is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  23. Change in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version (IWQoL-Lite for CT): Total Score

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in IWQoL-Lite for CT total score. IWQoL-Lite for CT (Weight on Quality of Life-Lite for Clinical Trial Version) is a modified version of an instrument designed to assess weight-related quality of life. The scores ranged between 0-100 where higher scores indicated a better quality of life. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  24. Change in Weight Related Sign and Symptom (WRSS) Measure, Total Score

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline (week 0) to week 56 in WRSS measure, total score. The WRSS measures the presence and bothersome associated with weight-related symptoms.

    The WRSS questionnaire was not validated until after database lock. Therefore the total score couldn't be calculated and the supportive secondary endpoint "Weight related sign and symptom (WRSS) measure, total score" couldn't be analysed.

  25. Subjects Who After 56 Weeks Achieve (Yes/no): ≥ 4.3 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Functioning Score

    Time frame: Week 56

    Percentage of subjects who achieved ≥ 4.3 T-score points increase from baseline in SF-36 physical functioning score at week 56 is presented. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  26. Subjects Who After 56 Weeks Achieve (Yes/no): ≥ 3.8 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Component Score

    Time frame: Week 56

    Percentage of subjects who achieved ≥ 3.8 T-score points increase from baseline in SF-36 physical component score at week 56 is presented. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  27. Subjects Who After 56 Weeks Achieve (Yes/no): ≥ 4.6 T-score Points Increase From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Score

    Time frame: Week 56

    Percentage of subjects who achieved ≥ 4.6 T-score points increase from baseline in SF-36 mental component score at week 56 is presented. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  28. Responder Definition Value for IWQoL-Lite for CT Physical Function Domain (5-items) Score

    Time frame: Week 56

    Responder definition value for IWQoL-Lite for CT physical function domain (5-items) score' was defined as '≥ 20 responder definition value for IWQoL-Lite for CT physical function domain (5-items) score. Percentage of subjects considered IWQoL-Lite for CT physical function domain score responders (increase of ≥20 points) at week 56 is presented. Results based on FAS in-trial data is presented.

  29. Number of Weeks (Completed Calendar Weeks) From Randomisation to Week 56 Adherent to Trial Product

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Adherence to trial product is assessed regularly at CMS-IBT visits. The number of weeks from randomisation to week 56, adherent to trial product is presented.

  30. Number of Weeks (Completed Calendar Weeks) From Randomisation to Week 56 Adherent to Caloric Diet

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Adherence to caloric diet is assessed regularly at CMS-IBT visits. The number of weeks from randomisation to week 56, adherent to caloric diet is presented.

  31. Number of Weeks (Completed Calendar Weeks) From Randomisation to Week 56 Adherent to Physical Activity

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Adherence to physical activity is assessed regularly at CMS-IBT visits. The number of weeks from randomisation to week 56, adherent to physical activity is presented.

  32. Number of Weeks (Completed Calendar Weeks) From Randomisation to Week 56 Adherent to Caloric Diet and Physical Activity

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Adherence to caloric diet and physical activity is assessed regularly at CMS-IBT visits. The number of weeks from randomisation to week 56, adherent to caloric diet and physical activity is presented.

  33. Number of Weeks (Completed Calendar Weeks) From Randomisation to Week 56 Adherent to Caloric Diet, Physical Activity and Trial Product

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Adherence to caloric diet, physical activity and trial product is assessed regularly at CMS-IBT visits. The number of weeks from randomisation to week 56, adherent to caloric diet, physical activity and trial product is presented.

  34. AEs From Randomisation Until and Including the Follow-up Period

    Time frame: Week 0 to week 56+30 days

    Number of adverse events from randomisation to until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period (30 days). Results based on SAS on-drug data is presented.

  35. Change in Physical Examination

    Time frame: Week 1, week 56

    Observed change from baseline to week 56 in physical examination are categorised under parameters namely abdomen, gastrointestinal system, cardiovascular system, central and peripheral nervous system, general appearence, head, ears, eyes, nose, throat and neck, lymph node palpation, musculoskeletal system, respiratory system, skin and thyroid gland. The percentage of subjects assessed as normal, abnormal not clinically significant and abnormal clinically significant at baseline and week 56 is presented.

  36. Change in Resting Pulse

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change in pulse rate measured at resting position is presented.

  37. Change in ECG

    Time frame: Week -1, week 56

    The ECGs were interpreted by the investigator at baseline (week -1) and week 56 and categorised as normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. Number of subjects in each ECG category at baseline and week 56 are presented.

  38. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Haematology (Haemoglobin Blood)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in haematological parameter blood haemoglobin.

  39. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Haematology (Haematocrit Blood)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in haematological parameter blood haematocrit. Haematocrit is presented as the percentage of red blood cells in total blood. Results based on SAS on-drug data is presented.

  40. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Haematology (Erythrocytes)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in haematological parameter - erythrocytes.

  41. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Haematology (Thrombocytes and Leukocytes)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in haematological parameters - thrombocytss and leukocytes.

  42. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Biochemistry (Albumin)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in biochemical parameter - albumin. Results based on SAS on-drug data is presented.

  43. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Biochemistry (Alkaline Phosphatase, Alanine Aminotransferase, Amylase, Aspartate Aminotransferase and Lipase)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in biochemical parameters - alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, amylase, aspartate aminotransferase and lipase. Results based on SAS on-drug data is presented.

  44. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Biochemistry (Bilirubin and Creatinine)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in biochemical parameters - bilirubin and creatinine. Results based on SAS on-drug data is presented.

  45. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Biochemistry (Total Calcium, Pottassium, Sodium and Urea)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in biochemical parameters - total calcium, pottassium, sodium and urea. Results based on SAS on-drug data is presented.

  46. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Biochemistry (C-reactive Protein and Uric Acid)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in biochemical parameters - high sensitive c-reactive protein and uric acid. Results based on SAS on-drug data is presented.

  47. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Biochemistry (Glomerular Filtration Rate, Serum)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in biochemical parameters - estimated glomerular filtration rate. Serum GFR is estimated using MDRD formula . Results based on SAS on-drug data is presented.

  48. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Biochemistry (Calcitonin)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in biochemical parameter - calcitonin. Results based on SAS on-drug data is presented.

  49. Change in Laboratory Measurements: Biochemistry (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone)

    Time frame: Week 0, week 56

    Observed mean change from baseline in biochemical parameters - thyroid stimulating hormone. Results based on SAS on-drug data is presented.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novo Nordisk A/S

Industry

Registry information

Acronym: SCALE™ IBT

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Nov 15, 2016
Registry last updated
Mar 11, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.