Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet
Oslo, 0372, Norway
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Eivind W Aabel, MD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05631730
FLECAPRO is a randomized controlled crossover trial assessing the effect and safety of adding flecainide to standard beta-blocker therapy to reduce the burden of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse. The primary endpoint of will be assessed using an implantable loop recorder with blinded endpoint adjudication.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Oslo, 0372, Norway
Location status: Recruiting
Eivind W Aabel, MD
CONTACT
Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common condition characterized by bulging one or both mitral leaflets into the left atrium. Although mainly a benign cardiac condition, a subgroup of patients develop severe ventricular arrhythmias that are a significant cause of sudden cardiac death in young adults. Arrhythmic MVP is defined as the presence of mitral valve prolapse with or without mitral annulus disjunction (MAD) combined with frequent ventricular ectopy, complex ectopy or sustained ventricular arrhythmia in the absence of another well-defined arrhythmic substrate. In these patients, ventricular arrhythmias most commonly originate from the mitral annulus, papillary muscles and outflow tracts. Several risk markers have been proposed, but clinical risk stratification remains challenging. Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse are associated with excess long-term mortality.
There is no established medical therapy to suppress ventricular arrhythmias and relieve arrhythmic symptoms in these patients, and conventional beta-blocker therapy is often unsuccessful for both. Invasive catheter ablation can suppress ventricular arrhythmias, and thus relieve symptoms, in a subset of patients. However, many patients have multifocal ventricular ectopy, often originating from deep in the myocardium or papillary muscles and not easily accessible for catheter ablation. Furthermore, recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias is common despite initial successful catheter ablation procedures. The only strategy to prevent sudden cardiac death for high-risk patients is to implant an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), but this approach does not provide any symptomatic relief. Thus, most patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse lack effective treatment options with proven efficacy in clinical trials.
Flecainide is a class 1c antiarrhythmic drug with a potent sodium channel-blocking effect frequently used in atrial tachyarrhythmias. Flecainide was developed as a treatment for ventricular arrhythmias, but its use subsided due to safety concerns when used in patients with acute myocardial infarction. However, this knowledge stems from a patient population before modern revascularization strategies after myocardial infarction and is extrapolated to patients with other structural heart diseases. Lately, flecainide has been shown to be safe in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Furthermore, flecainide reduces ventricular arrhythmias in patients with premature ventricular complex (PVC)-mediated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia without short-term adverse effects. However, flecainide has not been studied in arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse patients.
The main goal of FLECAPRO is to evaluate the effect and safety of adding flecainide to standard beta-blocker therapy to reduce the burden of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse. We hypothesize that a flecainide-based strategy is superior to a beta blocker-based strategy to suppress ventricular arrhythmias in patients with arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Flecainide is mainly used for pharmacological conversion in patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias and to suppress ventricular arrhythmias in patients with structurally normal hearts.
Other names: C01B C04
Metoprolol is a beta-blocker and class II antiarrhythmic drug considered standard care in most cardiac diseases predisposing to ventricular arrhythmias, including arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse.
Other names: C07A B02
Time frame: 12 months
Sum of ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia (broad complex tachycardia with heart rate >140/min) on implantable loop recorder during 12 months. Intention-to-treat, superiority.
Time frame: 12 months
First hierarchical key secondary outcome. Assessed by 24-hour Holter monitoring. Intention-to-treat, superiority
Time frame: 12 months
Second hierarchical key secondary outcome. Number of patients with ≥5-point increase in Short Form 36 overall summary score. Intention-to-treat, superiority
Time frame: 12 months
Third hierarchical key secondary outcome. Sum of (i) non-sustained ventricular tachycardia with syncope, (ii) sustained ventricular tachycardia and (iii) ventricular fibrillation. Intention-to-treat, superiority
Time frame: 12 months
Sum of (i) number of adverse events, (ii) number of serious adverse events, and (iii) higher degree atrioventricular (AV)-block (Mobitz type 2 or 3rd-degree AV-block). Safety population.
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome of the individual component of the primary endpoint. Ventricular tachycardia (broad complex tachycardia with heart rate >140/min) on implantable loop recorder during 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome of the individual component of the primary endpoint. Ventricular fibrillations on implantable loop recorder during 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome of the individual component of key secondary endpoints. Assessed by 24-hour Holter monitoring
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome of the individual component of key secondary endpoints. Number of patients with ≥5-point increase in Short Form 36 overall summary score.
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome of the individual component of key secondary endpoints. Sum of (i) non-sustained ventricular tachycardia with syncope, (ii) sustained ventricular tachycardia and (iii) ventricular fibrillation.
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome. Change in left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by echocardiography.
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome. Assessment of blood samples.
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome.
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome. Assessed by 12-lead ECG
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome. Assessed by echocardiography.
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome. Assessed by change in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire (0-21 with higher scores indicating greater anxiety or depression).
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome. Sum of ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia (broad complex tachycardia with heart rate >140/min) on implantable loop recorder during 12 months. Per-protocol sensitivity analysis.
Time frame: 12 months
Exploratory outcome. Sum of (i) number of adverse events, (ii) number of serious adverse events, and (iii) higher degree AV-block (Mobitz type 2 or 3rd-degree AV-block). Intention-to-treat.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Oslo University Hospital
Other
An Investigator-Initiated Prospective Randomized Open-Label Blinded-Endpoint Crossover Trial Comparing the Effect and Safety of Flecainide and Metoprolol Versus Metoprolol Alone to Suppress Ventricular Arrhythmias in Arrhythmic Mitral Valve Prolapse
Acronym: FLECAPRO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07384871
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
San Donato Milanese, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06341166
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06255457
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Conduction System Disease
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT07103733
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details