Abacavir/Lamivudine
Drug600 mg abacavir/300 mg lamivudine tablet taken orally daily
Other names: ABC/3TC
NCT Number: NCT00118898
Currently, the preferred anti-HIV regimens used in the United States consist of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) efavirenz (EFV). However, with new anti-HIV drugs being approved, alternative regimens need to be tested to determine if new drug combinations have increased effectiveness in treating HIV. The purpose of this study is to test the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of four different regimens in HIV-infected adults who have never taken anti-HIV drugs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Puerto Rico-AIDS CRS (5401), San Juan, Puerto Rico
Antiretroviral (ARV) treatment regimens consisting of EFV and two NRTIs are the most commonly prescribed regimens for the initial therapy of HIV-infected people in the United States. Such regimens are popular because the drugs are easy to administer, have overall excellent efficacy, and are well tolerated. However, because of concerns about long-term drug toxicity, the development of drug resistance, and potential complications in pregnant women, it is imperative that other drug combinations be investigated as possible alternative initial regimens. Drugs recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for HIV treatment include the protease inhibitor (PI) atazanavir (ATV) and the two NRTI coformulations emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) and abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC). Data are limited on the efficacy of these new drugs when part of anti-HIV drug regimens. This study will evaluate and compare the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of four different treatment regimens in HIV-infected treatment-naive adults.
The treatment portion of this study will last 96 weeks after the last participant is enrolled. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four arms:
NOTE: Lopinavir/ritonavir may be used in substitution of other drugs for certain participants.
Study visits will occur at study entry; Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24; and every 12 weeks thereafter. A physical exam, blood collection, and urine collection will occur at most visits. Two pharmacokinetic blood samples will be collected from participants between Weeks 4 and 24. Participants will undergo adherence training at study entry and will be asked to complete adherence questionnaires at selected study visits. Some participants will be asked to participate in ACTG A5224s, a metabolic substudy of ACTG A5202.
The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) for A5202 met in January 2008 to review the study. After reviewing the study information, the DSMB noted that certain study regimens were significantly less effective than others. Specifically, ABC/3TC-containing regimens were not as effective in controlling the virus as TDF/FTC-containing regimens for participants entering the study with high viral loads. The DSMB also commented that participants assigned to ABC/3TC had a shorter time until they experienced side effects than participants assigned to TDF/FTC. The DSMB had no safety concerns for the other drug comparisons.
Based on DSMB review, in Feb 2008 participants who started the study with high viral loads were told whether they were taking ABC/3TC or TDF/FTC and offered the option to continue or change their NRTI study drug component, after discussion with their doctor. For participants who started the study with lower screening viral loads, study treatment continued without change.
For 74 participant the reason for first treatment modification was "unblinded and switched" as a consequence of the DSMB results (33 on EFV, ABC/3TC, and placebo FTC/TDF arm; 1 on RTV-boosted ATV, FTC/TDF, and placebo ABC/3TC arm; and 40 on RTV-boosted ATV, ABC/3TC, and placebo FTC/TDF arm).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
600 mg abacavir/300 mg lamivudine tablet taken orally daily
Other names: ABC/3TC
300 mg tablet taken orally daily
Other names: ATV
600 mg tablet taken orally daily
Other names: EFV
200 mg emtricitabine/300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablet taken orally daily
Other names: FTC/TDF
100 mg tablet taken orally daily
Other names: RTV
Placebo tablet taken orally daily
Other names: ABC/3TC placebo
Placebo tablet taken orally daily
Other names: FTC/TDF placebo
Time frame: Follow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details
Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at visit weeks 16 and 24 , and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level >= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks after randomization and before 24 weeks, or >=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. The 5th percentile for time to virologic failure is the time (in weeks) at which 5% of the participants have experienced virologic failure.
Time frame: All follow-up while on initially assigned regimen; the median (25th, 75th percentile) follow-up while on initial regimen was 120 (54, 156) weeks and the range was 0 to 205 weeks.
Grade 3/4 safety event is defined as a grade 3 or 4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality that is at least one grade higher than at baseline, total bilirubin and creatine kinase (CPK) were excluded. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables.
Time frame: Follow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details
Treatment modification is defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Time frame: Follow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details
Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level >= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or >=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. Treatment modification was defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96
Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96
Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96
Change was calculated as the CD4 count at Week 48 (or at Week 96) minus the baseline CD4 count (mean of pre-entry and entry values).
Time frame: Follow-up time was variable,median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details
Emergence of resistant virus was assessed by genotypic testing performed at Stanford University for all participants who met criteria for virologic failure and retrospectively on baseline samples from these participants. Major mutations were defined by International AIDS Society-United States of America (2008), as well as T69D, L74I, G190C/E/Q/T/V for reverse transcriptase and L24I, F53L, I54V/A/T/S, G73C/S/T/A, N88D for protease.
Time frame: Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details
AIDS-defining illnesses were defined per CDC category C definition. HIV-1 related events were defined per CDC category B definition. Events underwent study chair review for classification. See link below for more details.
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00018871.htm
Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96
Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.
Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96
Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.
Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96
Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.
Time frame: At Weeks 48 and 96
Only fasting results are included. The protocol did not require that samples be collected fasting.
Time frame: Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks
Participants were to be followed for 96 weeks after the last enrollment. Accrual was expected to take 96 weeks, thus the planned follow-up time was 96 to 192 weeks, dependent on when in the study the participant enrolled. This outcome summarizes that total amount of actual follow-up in weeks from randomization to last contact.
Time frame: Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details
Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level >= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or >=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks.
Time frame: At week 48 and 96
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level >= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or >=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks.
Time frame: Over all study follow-up while on initially assigned treatment, median follow-up was 120 weeks
Grade 3/4 safety event is defined as a grade 3 or 4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality that is at least one grade higher than at baseline, total bilirubin and creatine kinase (CPK) were excluded. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables. As-treated analysis censored at 1st modification of initially assigned regimen, participants who never started treatment were excluded.
Time frame: At week 48 and 96
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Grade 3/4 safety event is defined as a grade 3 or 4 sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality that is at least one grade higher than at baseline, total bilirubin and creatine kinase (CPK) were excluded. Grading used the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2004 Severity of Adverse Events Tables. As-treated analysis censored at 1st modification of initially assigned regimen, participants who never started treatment were excluded.
Time frame: Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details
Treatment modification is defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Time frame: At week 48 and 96
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Treatment modification is defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Time frame: Follow-up time was variable, median follow-up was 138 weeks; see 'Amount of study follow-up' outcome for details
Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level >= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or >=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. Treatment modification was defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Time frame: At week 48 and 96
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative survival probability at week 48 and 96. Blood samples for determining virologic failure were obtained at 16 and 24 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Virologic failure was defined as a confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level >= 1000 copies/mL at or after 16 weeks and before 24 weeks or >=200 copies/mL at or after 24 weeks. Treatment modification was defined as the 1st modification of the regimen, including a permanent discontinuation, switch, or substitution.
Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
Network
A Phase IIIB, Randomized Trial of Open-Label Efavirenz or Atazanavir With Ritonavir in Combination With Double-Blind Comparison of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir or Abacavir/Lamivudine in Antiretroviral-Naive Subjects
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05149001
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Aix-en-Provence, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05732675
Behavior, Bisexuality
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT07750834
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Behavior
Khartoum, Omdurman, Sudan
View Trial DetailsNCT06012136
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial Details