Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04598906

Ecologically Valid Virtual Tasks vs Paper-pencil Methods in Cognitive Rehabilitation in Patients With Schizophrenia and Depression

Schizophrenia is heterogeneous and often disabling a disease that affects 1% of the population. Current psychopharmacological treatment significantly eliminates the presence of positive symptoms (especially delusions and hallucinations) and partly also negative symptoms (social withdrawal or abulia). In contrast, the cognitive deficits associated both with schizophrenia and depression are only limitedly influenced by pharmacological treatment.The cognitive impairment represents an important part of schizophrenia symptomatology and it has a severe negative impact on patients' quality of life. In depression is the impairment milder but still significantly contributes to patients' daily functioning. The profound deficit was repeatedly documented in the area of declarative and working memory. In this study, we study the effectiveness of virtual environment rehabilitation program focused on declarative memory, working memory and attention in comparison to standard paper-pencil rehabilitation led by an occupational therapist.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mental Health Center

Fryštát, 733 01, Czechia

About this study

This study compares effectiveness of the virtual environment cognitive rehabilitation program with standard paper-pencil approach in within-subject design.

Participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or major depressive disorder will undergo a baseline assessment of cognition.

The participants will be at the baseline randomly assigned to each condition: virtual environment rehabilitation or paper-pencil rehabilitation. Then they will participate in 10-15 sessions (30-45 minutes) once or twice a week.

All participants will undergo retest assessment of cognition.

After completion of the first program the participants will be assigned to the different condition: to paper-pencil or virtual environment rehabilitation. After 10-15 sessions in the second condition the participants will once more undergo retest assessment of cognition.

Within-subject design is an effective tool in the development of scientifically proven treatment tools. This approach allows to obtain reliable information about the effectiveness of the method and to examine the influences of other variables (Steingrimsdottir and Arntzen 2015). This study will allow to get credible information on the importance of using the virtual environment in the context of cognitive rehabilitation in patients with schizophrenia and depression.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia and other primary psychotic disorders or diagnosis of major depressive disorder according to International Classification of Diseases-11

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe visual impairment
  • Age over 60 years
  • Diagnosis of other psychiatric disorder than schizophrenia or major depressive disorder
  • Physical handicap preventing the participant from participating in virtual environment training
  • Refusal to sign an informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Virtual environment rehabilitation

Behavioral

The participants attended 10-15 computer sessions during 6-12 weeks. Each session lasted 30 minutes and consisted of the set of virtual environment tasks (Shooting Range,Virtual Supermarket Shopping Task and Objects). Shooting range demands differentiation of targets from non-targets and focuses on training of selective attention, psychomotor speed and inhibition control. Virtual Supermarket Shopping requires memorizing the shopping list and searching for products in the supermarket area. Objects requires memorizing of the spatial and temporal context while searching for objects.

Paper-pencil rehabilitation

Behavioral

The participants in the paper-pencil rehabilitation attended 10-15 paper pencil sessions for 6-12 weeks. Each session lasted 45 minutes. Each paper-pencil session starts with a warm-up game. The session continues with a set of paper-pencil tasks focused on attention, fine motor skills, recall, short-term and long-term memory, verbal fluency, visual search, cognitive flexibility, abstraction and executive functions, numerical abilities. The tasks are adapted according to the participant´s abilities.

Primary outcomes

  1. Cognitive abilities measured by The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Item performance in Virtual Supermarket Shopping Task

    Time frame: Baseline, 6-12 weeks

    The data from individual sessions with Virtual Supermarket Shopping Task will be analyzed to see participants' progress. The variable item performance will be used = number of items to remember/ correctly collected items.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Mental Health, Czech Republic

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Virtual Environment in Cognitive Rehabilitation With Standard Rehabilitation Methods in Patients With Schizophrenia and in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Oct 22, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 2, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.