Maastricht UMC
Maastricht, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Paolo Meani, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Paolo Meani, MD,PhD
CONTACT
Paolo Meani, MD,PhD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06766006
The present study is an International multicentric prospective observational cohort study. This will be an international research campaign to prospectively collect and analyze clinical data of all VA ECLS patients admitted to participating ICUs with a focus on LV venting modalities. The aims of the study are:
* To investigate the meaning of LV overload during veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal life support; * To extensively describe the left ventricular (LV) unloading strategy during VA extracorporeal life support in a large prospective international cohort. * To compare different strategies to unload the left ventricular in terms of efficacy and outcomes;
Interested in participating?
Request Info1 day–80 year
All sexes
Observational
Maastricht, Netherlands
Location status: Recruiting
Paolo Meani, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Paolo Meani, MD,PhD
CONTACT
Paolo Meani, MD,PhD
CONTACT
Cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest are among the most lethal manifestations of acute cardiovascular disease, both burdened by extremely high in-hospital mortality rates. Extracorporeal life support is increasingly used either in adults or children with acutely impaired cardiac function refractory to conventional medical management, mainly in profound cardiogenic shock and refractory cardiac arrest. Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support works as a partial cardiopulmonary bypass draining the venous circulation directly into the systemic circulation. Veno-arterial extracorporeal life support provides biventricular support and provides respiratory gas exchange. One of the most important issues occurring during veno-arterial extracorporeal life support is the effect of the retrograde aortic flow which causes a marked increase in the left ventricular afterload with detrimental effects on myocardial performance. Left ventricular overload increases wall stress and myocardial oxygen consumption, jeopardizing ventricular recovery. Nowadays, different techniques are available for unloading the left chambers. However, despite the increasing worldwide experience with extracorporeal life support and the increased knowledge on the benefits of left ventricular unloading, the best veno-arterial extracorporeal life support configuration to achieve hemodynamic support, myocardial recovery, and left ventricular unloading, is still a matter of debate.
This is a prospective clinical study which is observational. The aims of the study are:
Demographics, clinical, instrumental and laboratory data prior and post implantation of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support will be collected. No interventions on top on the ones necessary as a standard of care will be taken.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Implantation of venoarterial extracorporeal life support implant for refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest of any cause.
Time frame: Day 30
Death during hospital stay
Time frame: Within 12 hours before the applied unloading technique
Presence of left ventricle (LV) overload (defined as: aortic valve opening impairment and/or smoke like effect and/or LA distension and/or LV distension).
The aforementioned criteria are defined as follows:
Time frame: 12 hours after the unloading technique implementation
Echocardiographic qualitative parameters:
Echocardiographic quantitative parameters:
Time frame: 12 hours after the unloading technique implementation
Unloading effectiveness, qualitative evaluation (yes/no) ( any of the following criteria: restored aortic valve opening (yes/no) and/or solved smoke like effect (yes/no) and/or reduced LA distension (yes/no) and/or reduced LV distension (yes/no) and/or decreased grade of mitral regurgitation)
Time frame: Day 30
Cerebral injury (stroke, transitory ischemic attack, intracranial hemorrhage and seizures by electroencephalogram), acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, hemolysis (defined as increased free hemoglobin level, peripheral vascular damage, infections (defined as positive bacterial, fungal or viral culture or polymerase chain reaction test), coagulation disorders (either thrombosis or hemorrhage) and ECLS failure (pump or oxygenator failure, or both), liver and kidney organ function.
Time frame: Day 30
Left ventricle Ejection fraction (%)
Time frame: Day 30
LVAD implant
Time frame: Day 30
Heart transplant
Time frame: Day 30
Cerebral Performance Category (CPC)
Time frame: 12 hours after the unloading technique implementation
LV end-diastolic diameter (mm)
Time frame: 12 hours after the unloading technique implementation
LV end-diastolic volume (ml)
Time frame: 12 hours after the unloading technique implementation
LV end-systolic diameter (mm)
Time frame: 12 hours after the unloading technique implementation
LV end-systolic volume(ml)
Time frame: 12 hours after the unloading technique implementation
LA volume (ml)
Time frame: 12 hours after the unloading technique implementation
E/E' septal and lateral (ratio, no unit of measurement )
Time frame: 12 hours after the unloading technique implementation
Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (mmHg)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Paolo Meani, MD, PhD
CONTACT
43 38811067 ext. +31
Roberto Lorusso, MD,PhD
CONTACT
43 38811067 ext. +31
Maastricht University Medical Center
Other
A Multicentric Left Ventricular Venting Strategy Comparison in Patients Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Life Support
Acronym: ECMOLENS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03714048
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Blood Coagulation Disorders
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06832722
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Yerevan, Armenia
View Trial DetailsNCT07085221
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05267886
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details