Standard of care
Otherretrospective study: standard of care
NCT Number: NCT04480151
In this retrospective observational multicenter study the authors tested the hypothesis that the use of IMPELLA™ pump as bridge to bridge, by giving the opportunity of active rehabilitation, should improve patient's outcomes after the implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
CHU de Dijon-Bourgoigne, Dijon, France
End stage heart failure patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for refractory cardiogenic shock requiring short-term mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to a long-term LVAD might benefit from early mobilization and rehabilitation with IMPELLA™ inserted via the axillary artery. The aim of this study is to compare the early rehabilitation and outcomes after LVAD implantation between patients previously treated by IMPELLA™ or ExtraCorporeal Life Support (ECLS)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
retrospective study: standard of care
Time frame: Day 30 after Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implantation
Proportion of patients alive in the surgery ward, not requiring intravenous access and walking (John Hopkins highest level of mobility (JH-HLM) scale = 8) at 30 days after the LVAD implantation
Time frame: The day of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implantation
Duration of support, bleeding, hemolysis, surgical re-exploration, thombus, renal replacement therapy, blood products transfusion, stroke, tracheal extubation, mobilization (chair, walking and ergometry)
Time frame: The day before LVAD implantation
Need for mechanical ventilation, Organ dysfunction assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [0= best outcome to 24 = worst outcome]
Time frame: The day of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge
bleeding, right ventricular dysfunction, vasoplegia
Time frame: The day of Short Term Mechanical Circulatory Support (STMCS) implantation
Organ dysfunction assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [0= best outcome to 24 = worst outcome]
Time frame: The day of LVAD implantation
Organ dysfunction assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [0= best outcome to 24 = worst outcome]
Time frame: Day 1 post LVAD implantation
Organ dysfunction assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [0= best outcome to 24 = worst outcome]
Time frame: Day 3 post LVAD implantation
Organ dysfunction assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [0= best outcome to 24 = worst outcome]
Time frame: Day 5 post LVAD implantation
Organ dysfunction assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [0= best outcome to 24 = worst outcome]
Time frame: Day 7 post LVAD implantation
Organ dysfunction assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [0= best outcome to 24 = worst outcome]
Time frame: 1 month after LVAD implantation
mortality after LVAD implantation
Time frame: 3 months after LVAD implantation
mortality after LVAD implantation
Time frame: 6 months after LVAD implantation
mortality after LVAD implantation
Time frame: up to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge (not more than 6 months after LVAD implantation)
Intensive Care Unit length of stay
Time frame: up to hospital discharge (not more than 6 months after LVAD implantation)
hospital length of stay
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Other
ExtraCorporeal Life Support (ECLS) Versus IMPELLA™ Pump as Bridge to Left Ventricular Assist Device
Acronym: ECI-BLAD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04886180
Cardiogenic Shock, Cardiovascular Diseases
Dijon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03773822
Adrenal Gland Diseases, Adrenal Insufficiency
Boulogne-Billancourt, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06487091
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiogenic Shock
Milan, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04934566
Cardiogenic Shock, Cardiovascular Diseases
Lille, NORD, France
View Trial Details