Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06913569

EBUS-TTFB vs EBUS-TBNA for Diagnosing Inadequate Lymph Node Specimens Based on MOSE

The study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transtunnel forceps biopsy to transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing inadequate lymph node specimens based on macroscopic on-site evaluation.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy are common clinical conditions. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is the standard method recommended by guidelines for obtaining tissue from these patients. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB) can overcome the limitations of inadequate tissue acquisition with EBUS-TBNA, and its efficacy and safety have been proved. However, EBUS-TBFB often requires the assistance of the electrocautery for mediastinal window creation, which increases technical difficulty and requires electrosurgical equipment, making it unsuitable for application in grassroots hospitals.

This study aims to use the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transtunnel forceps biopsy (EBUS-TTFB) method. A single-use bronchoscopic puncture dilation catheter will be employed to establish a tunnel between the airway and the lymph node, with both puncture and dilation completed in the same procedure. Currently, there is a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials to verify the efficacy and safety of EBUS-TTFB.

This study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. A total of 162 patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the EBUS-TBNA group or the EBUS-TTFB group. The primary endpoint is thediagnostic yield. The secondary endpoints include specimen adequacy, procedure duration, tunnel creation success rate, and safety.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Chest imaging shows mediastinal or hilar lymphadenopathy (short axis ≥10 mm), requiring EBUS-TBNA for definitive diagnosis;
  • EBUS-TBNA can be performed on these lymph nodes, and the specimens obtained from conventional EBUS-TBNA with three needle passes are inadequate (macroscopic visible core < 30 mm);
  • Willing to participate in this clinical study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Enlarged lymph nodes are identified as cystic or abscesses;
  • Severe coagulopathy, insufficient anticoagulants/antiplatelets withdraw time or bleeding diathesis (platelets<50*109/L, INR>1.3) that do not meet bronchoscopy requirements;
  • Other contraindications to bronchoscopy or transbronchial biopsy, such as severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency, intolerance to anesthesia, or endoscopic procedures;
  • Patients who have participated in another clinical trial within the past three months;
  • Vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women
  • Any other condition that the investigator considers inappropriate for participation in this study.

Treatment and study plan

EBUS-TBNA

Procedure

Participants with lymphadenopathy would receive EBUS-TBNA attempts to conduct diagnoses.

EBUS-TTFB

Procedure

Participants with lymphadenopathy would receive EBUS-TTFB attempts to conduct diagnoses.

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic yield

    Time frame: Six months after the procedure

    The diagnostic yield is defined as the proportion of lymph nodes diagnosed by each biopsy to the total number of lymph nodes enrolled in the study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sample adequacy

    Time frame: Six months after the procedure

    The adequacy rate of samples for genetic testing: measured as the percentage of lymph node samples qualified for next-generation sequencing among all malignant lymph nodes.

  2. Total procedure time

    Time frame: During the procedure

    The total procedure time is defined as the time from the insertion of the bronchoscope to its removal.

  3. TTFB procedure time

    Time frame: During the procedure

    The EBUS-TTFB procedure time is defined as the time from the insertion of the biopsy needle into the bronchoscope to the cessation of bleeding after the final TTFB.

  4. TBNA procedure time

    Time frame: During the procedure

    The EBUS-TBNA procedure time is defined as the time from the insertion of the biopsy needle into the bronchoscope to the cessation of bleeding after the final TBNA.

  5. Tunnel creation success rate

    Time frame: During the procedure

    Defined as the percentage of lymph nodes in the EBUS-TTFB group where successful tunneling was achieved among the total number of lymph nodes.

  6. Incidence of complications

    Time frame: Six months after the procedure

    Including pneumothorax, infection, mediastinal hematoma, emphysema and etc.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jiayuan Sun, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+86-021-22200000 ext. 1511

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Chest Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transtunnel Forceps Biopsy vs. Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Inadequate Lymph Node Specimens Based on Macroscopic On-site Evaluation: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 6, 2025
Registry last updated
Apr 18, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.