Levoleucovorin Calcium
DrugLiquid leucovorin calcium dosed by weight
Other names: L-leucovorin, L-leucovorin calcium, L-folinic acid, calcium salt, L-folinate, calcium salt
NCT Number: NCT04060017
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the cognitive and behavioral effects of liquid leucovorin calcium on young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and determine whether it improves language as well as the core and associated symptoms of ASD. The investigators will enroll 80 children across two sites, between the ages of 2.5 and 5 years, with confirmed ASD and known language delays or impairments. Participation will last approximately 26 weeks from screening to end of treatment.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me30 month–60 month
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Southwestern Autism Research & Resource Center, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder with life-long consequences that affects young children during critical times in their development. ASD is defined by impairments in social-communication as well as the presence of restricted interests and repetitive behaviors. ASD is frequently associated with co-occurring language delays. Currently the only well-accepted treatment for core ASD symptoms is behavior therapy such as Applied Behavioral Analysis and Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention. There is no US Food and Drug Administration approved medical therapy that addresses core ASD symptoms or the pathophysiological processes that underlie ASD.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a liquid form of leucovorin calcium on language impairments in very young children with ASD. Participants entered into the trial will have delayed social and communication abilities known to be associated with ASD. The investigators hypothesize that leucovorin calcium will significantly improve language as well as core and associated behavioral symptoms of ASD, and be well-tolerated with no significant adverse effects, in young children with ASD. The investigators further hypothesize that a combination of baseline cellular and genetic biomarkers will predict cognitive and behavioral response to the intervention.
To assess whether the liquid form of leucovorin calcium is superior to placebo, the investigators will study 80 children across two sites, between the ages of 2.5 and 5 years, with confirmed ASD and known language delays at baseline. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive active treatment or placebo for 12 weeks under double-blind conditions. At the end of 12 weeks, all participants will receive active treatment for 12 weeks. Language skills, as well as specimen biomarkers, will be measured at screening and after each treatment arm in order to determine if the supplement positively influences language ability.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Liquid leucovorin calcium dosed by weight
Other names: L-leucovorin, L-leucovorin calcium, L-folinic acid, calcium salt, L-folinate, calcium salt
Placebo
Time frame: Screening, Week 12, Week 24
Mullen Scales of Early Learning: a scale of cognitive abilities across the following domains: gross motor (not a core subscale), visual reception, fine motor, expressive language, and receptive language. Total change in expressive language ability will be measured by the change in the expressive language raw score. The expressive language domain is a 28-item scale with a raw score range of 0-50. Changes in expressive language raw scores will be reported. A higher raw score indicates a higher level of language ability.
Time frame: Screening, Week 12, Week 24
Mullen Scales of Early Learning: a scale of cognitive abilities across the following domains: gross motor (not a core subscale), visual reception, fine motor, expressive language, and receptive language. Total change in receptive language ability will be measured by the change in the receptive language raw and t score. The receptive language domain is a 33-item scale with a raw score range of 0-48 and a t score range of 20-80. T scores are calculated from the raw score and based on age norms. Changes in receptive language raw and t scores will be reported. A higher raw and t score indicates a higher level of language ability. In addition, we will analyze change in expressive language t-score.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 10, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 24
Modified Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptoms: treating clinician will perform a review of medical and behavioral history at each visit to assess incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. The treating clinician will use the scale to record presence and intensity of adverse effects. Intensity is rated on a scale of 0 (Not present) to 3 (Severe). The treating clinician will also judge the adverse effects' relatedness to treatment. Relatedness is rated on a scale of 1 (None) to 4 (Defined). The treating clinician will denote action taken. Action taken is rated on a scale of 0 (None) to 5 (Discontinue Treatment). No total score is calculated. However, higher ratings on any individual item indicate greater severity of adverse effects.
Time frame: Screening, Week 12, Week 24
Routine comprehensive blood panels will be collected to determine whether treatment-emergent basic blood chemistry is altered. Presence of any changes during the course of study enrollment will be evaluated by the treating physician and determined clinically significant or not clinically significant. If determined by the treating physician, a change will be considered an adverse event.
Time frame: Screening, Week 12, Week 24
For children using antiepileptic drugs, the level of that drug will be measured. If determined by the treating physician, a change will be considered an adverse event.
Time frame: Screening, Week 12, Week 24
Brief Observation of Social Communication Change: a 16-item scale that rates social interactions between children with ASD and their interactive rater. Each item is rated on a scale of 0-5, wherein 0 indicates the least severe behavior and 5 indicates the most severe behavior. A higher score is indicative of more severe social communication deficits. Because this evaluation is not valid with PPE it will not be performed during evaluation when PPE is required
Time frame: Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
Aberrant Behavior Checklist-2: a 58-item parent-reported measure of stereotypical autism behaviors with ratings in the following domains: irritability, social withdrawal, stereotypic behavior, hyperactivity, and inappropriate speech. Each item is rated from 0 (Not a Problem) to 3 (Severe Problem). The raw score will be reported. The total raw score is the sum of the domain raw scores. A higher raw score in any of the domains indicates more severe problems in that domain; a higher total raw score indicates more severity of stereotypical autism symptoms overall.
Time frame: Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
Aberrant Behavior Checklist-2: a 58-item parent-reported measure of stereotypical autism behaviors with ratings in the following domains: irritability, social withdrawal, stereotypic behavior, hyperactivity, and inappropriate speech. Each item is rated from 0 (Not a Problem) to 3 (Severe Problem). The raw score will be reported. The total raw score is the sum of the domain raw scores. A higher raw score in any of the domains indicates more severe problems in that domain; a higher total raw score indicates more severity of stereotypical autism symptoms overall.
Time frame: Screening, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
Parent Target Problems: a parent-nominated list of 2 most problematic core autism symptoms. Responses are documented in a brief narrative and detail frequency, constancy, intensity, and impact of behavior on the family. Subjective reports of frequency, constancy, intensity, and impact on family will be rated by a blinded statistician at the conclusion of the study. Higher scores indicate more severe impact on family.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
Clinical Global Impression Scale: The Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity is a 7-point measure of overall symptom severity, ranging from 1 (Normal) to 7 (Extreme), with a raw score range of 1-7. The raw score will be reported. The Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement is a measure in change of symptom severity, ranging from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). A Score of 4 indicates no change in symptom severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
Ohio State University Clinical Impressions Scale: a clinical rating of severity and improvement of 10 autism domains: social interaction, aberrant/abnormal behavior, repetitive/ritualistic behavior, verbal communication, non-verbal communication, hyperactivity/inattention, anxiety/fears, sensory sensitivities, restricted/narrow interests, autism. Severity will be measured at baseline. Each item is rated from 1 (Normal) to 7 (Among the most severe) with a raw score range of 10-70. The raw score will be reported. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. At the following time points, improvement will be measured. Each item is rated from 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worse) with a raw score range of 10-70. The raw score will be reported. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Mullen Scales of Early Learning: a scale of cognitive abilities across core domains: visual reception, fine motor, expressive language, receptive language. Expressive language domain: 28-item scale with a raw score range of 0-50, t score range of 20-80. Receptive language domain: 33-item scale with a raw score range of 0-48, t score range of 20-80. Visual reception domain: 33-item scale with a raw score range of 0-50, t score range of 20-80. Fine motor domain: 33-item scale with a raw score range of 0-50, t score range of 20-80.
Change in domain ability will be measured by the change in domain t score. T scores are calculated from raw scores and based on age norms. A higher domain t score indicates a higher level of ability in that domain. Domain t scores will be used to get a standard composite score. Change in cognition will be measured by change in the Early Learning Composite standardized Scaled score. A higher composite score indicates higher overall cognitive ability.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-II Domain LevelI: a scale to assess adaptive behavior in children with developmental/intellectual disabilities. This is a 135-item parent-reported measure with ratings in the following domains: communication, daily living skills, and socialization. The frequency of each item is scaled from 0 (Never) to 2 (Usually). For each domain, there are 45 items with a maximum score of 90. Change in each domain will be measured by the change in standard score. Standard scores are calculated from the raw scores and based on age norms. A higher standard score in any domain indicates a higher level of adaptive behavior in that domain. Domain standard scores will be used to get a standard composite score. Change in adaptive behavior will be measured by the change in the standard score. A higher composite score indicates higher overall adaptive behavior ability.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, Week 24
Social Responsiveness Scale Preschool Version. The Social Responsiveness Scale is a quantitative scale that measures severity and type of social impairments that characterize ASD. It is a standard measure in ASD clinical trials. We will use the preschool version to match the age range of our study.
Time frame: Screening
FRAA titers (described above) will be measured and analyzed as a predictive variable in treatment outcomes.
Time frame: Screening, Week 12
Saliva will be collected to determine presence of the following single nucleotide polymorphisms: MTR, MTHFR6, DHFR, GCH1, MTHFR12, RFC, FOLH, COMT. Presence or absence of these genetic polymorphisms will be analyzed to assess correlation with response to L-leucovorin treatment.
Time frame: Up to 1 year after study completion
A combination of FRAA titers and single nucleotide polymorphisms will be analyzed along with outcome data to predict response to L-leucovorin. Presence or absence of one or both of these biomarkers will be analyzed to assess how these biomarkers correlate with treatment outcome (i.e. whether the treatment was effective).
Southwest Autism Research & Resource Center
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04060030
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02839915
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06852989
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autistic Disorder
Rome, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04511767
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial Details