Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01161732

Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Very Severe Aortic Stenosis

The optimal timing of surgical intervention remains controversial in asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis. The investigators therefore try to compare long-term clinical outcomes of early surgery with those of conventional treatment strategy in a prospective randomized trial.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Management of asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) remains controversial, and the combined risks of aortic valve surgery and late complications of aortic valve prosthesis need to be balanced against the possibility of preventing sudden death and lowering cardiac mortality. Considering that sudden cardiac death occurs at a rate of approximately 1% per year and that the average postoperative mortality of isolated AV replacement is 3.0-4.0%, the 2007 European Society of Cardiology guidelines do not recommend aortic valve surgery for asymptomatic patients with severe AS and the 2006 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend surgery as a class IIb indication only in patients with extremely severe AS and who are at low operative risk. Clinical outcomes vary widely according to the severity of stenosis in asymptomatic AS, and asymptomatic patients with very severe AS are often referred for aortic valve replacement in clinical practice despite the lack of data supporting early surgery. Rosenhek et al recently reported a worse prognosis with a higher event rate and a risk of rapid deterioration in very severe AS, and the investigators also recently reported that compared with the conventional treatment strategy, early surgery in patients with very severe AS is associated with an improved long-term survival in a prospective, observational study. However, there have been no prospective,randomized studies comparing early surgery with a watchful waiting strategy in very severe AS. We sought to compare long-term clinical outcomes of early surgery with those of conventional management based on current guidelines.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis who are potential candidates for early surgery. Very severe aortic stenosis are defined as a critical stenosis in the AV area ≤ 0.75 square centimeter fulfilling one of the following criteria; a peak aortic velocity ≥ 4.5 m/sec or a mean transaortic pressure gradient ≥ 50 mmHg on Doppler echocardiography.

According to the revised 2014 AHA/ACC Valvular Heart Disease Guideline that recommends exercise testing to confirm the absence of symptoms in asymptomatic patients with severe AS (Class IIa), eligible patients with a positive exercise test will be excluded from the entry after May, 2014.

Exclusion criteria

  • Exertional dyspnea
  • Angina
  • Syncope
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%
  • Significant aortic regurgitation
  • Significant mitral valve disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Age < 20 years or > 80 years
  • Coexisting malignancies
  • Positive exercise test

Treatment and study plan

Early Surgery

Procedure

Early surgery is performed within 2 months of randomization.

Other names: Early aortic valve replacement surgery

Primary outcomes

  1. Cardiac mortality

    Time frame: Entire follow-up ( a minimum of 10 years)

    defined as death from complications of myocardial infarction, heart failure, shock, complications of cardiac surgery or intervention, other cardiovascular diseases including sudden cardiac death

  2. Operative mortality

    Time frame: up to 30 days after surgery

    Operative mortality is defined as death within 30 days of surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause death

    Time frame: Entire follow-up (a minimum of 10 years)

  2. Repeat aortic valve surgery

    Time frame: Entire follow-up (a minimum of 10 years)

  3. Clinical thromboembolic events

    Time frame: Entire follow-up (a minimum of 10 years)

    Diagnosis of thromboembolic events is based on clinical symptoms, signs and imaging studies.

  4. Hospitalization due to congestive heart failure

    Time frame: Entire follow-up (a minimum of 10 years)

    A hospitalization due to congestive heart failure is defined as an unplanned, urgent admission for the management of congestive heart failure.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Asan Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Korean Institute of Medicine

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Comparison of Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Very Severe Aortic Stenosis

Acronym: RECOVERY

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 14, 2010
Registry last updated
Jun 26, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.