Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
Marseille, 13015, France
NCT Number: NCT02750579
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the cornerstone of the care of intermediate and high-risk non ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). Revascularization reduces the rate of cardiovascular death and recurrent myocardial infarction in this clinical setting. The recommendation regarding the timing of intervention in this clinical setting is derived from old trials and has a weak level of evidence. In fact, there are no conclusive randomized trials in the contemporary era providing guidance on the optimal timing of intervention. In addition, the optimal timing of this critical intervention has not been studied since the development of new P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonists and the controversy surrounding the use of pretreatment with a P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonist before intervention. Early intervention in intermediate and high-risk non ST-elevation ACS is not well validated to date. In addition, the recent changes in the use of pretreatment with P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonists may impact on the potential benefit of an early intervention.
Based on these evidences, we hypothesize that with the current protocols of care without pretreatment with a P2Y12-ADP receptor antagonist, an early PCI (<2 hours) would be superior to a delayed (between 12 to 72 hours) PCI in the setting of intermediate or high-risk non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to prevent cardiovascular death and ischemic recurrences.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Marseille, 13015, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization with anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy (routine care)
Time frame: 1 month
compare the efficacy defined by the rate of recurrent ischemic events at 1 month of 2 therapeutic strategies: an immediate (<2 hours) versus a delayed (12-72 hours) intervention for intermediate and high-risk non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome compare the efficacy defined by the rate of cardiovascular death and/or recurrent ischemic events at 1 month of 2 therapeutic strategies: an immediate (<2 hours) versus a delayed (12-72 hours) intervention for intermediate and high-risk non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
Time frame: 1 month
compare the efficacy defined by the rate of cardiovascular death at 1 month of 2 therapeutic strategies: an immediate (<2 hours) versus a delayed (12-72 hours) intervention for intermediate and high-risk non ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05853042
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Myocardial Infarction
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05992259
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Krasnodar, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT06440278
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiovascular Diseases
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05183178
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiovascular Diseases
Lund, Sweden
View Trial Details