Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02555137

Early Non-invasive Detection of CTEPH After Pulmonary Embolism

This is a prospective, international, multicenter outcome cohort study. This study starts at the moment patients visit the outpatient clinic 3 to 6 months after a diagnosis of acute PE as part of routine medical care. If patients consent to study participation, the CTEPH clinical prediction score will be calculated. CTEPH is considered to be not present in patients with a low probability (≤6 points) and no symptoms suggestive of CTEPH, i.e. dyspnea on exertion, edema, newly developed palpitations, syncope or chest pains.The remaining patients with either high probability (>6 points) or who report symptoms that may be associated with CTEPH will be subjected to the 'rule-out criteria'. CTEPH will be assumed not present in patients with an age- and gender dependent normal NT-proBNP level (as defined by the assay's manufacturer), in the absence of any of the 3 ECG criteria. Patients who have an abnormal result from the 'rule-out criteria' will be referred for transthoracic echocardiography. All echocardiograms will be performed according to a predefined standardized protocol.

In case of echocardiographic intermediate or high probability of PH, patients will be referred for further diagnostic work-up of suspected CTEPH starting with perfusion lung scan or VQ-scan and right heart catheterization, of which the results will be discussed by an independent interdisciplinary working group of PH specialists, to ensure optimal diagnostic management. This latter diagnostic work-up of an abnormal echocardiograph lies within the setting of standard medical care.

All patients who were not diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension of any origin, or with NYHA class III or IV heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or significant valvular lesions, will be followed for a total of 2 years from the index PE diagnosis. During that period, the study protocol will not interfere with standard patient care, allowing diagnostic tests as deemed indicated by the treating physician including echocardiography in case of new respiratory symptoms. At the end of the follow-up period, all patients will be subjected to a second echocardiography that will be handled according to the above stated procedures to evaluate the presence of CTEPH.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a prospective, international, multicenter outcome cohort study. This study starts at the moment patients visit the outpatient clinic 3 to 6 months after a diagnosis of acute PE as part of routine medical care. If patients consent to study participation, the CTEPH clinical prediction score will be calculated. This score consists of 6 variables that should be assessed at the time of PE diagnosis: unprovoked PE (+6 points), known hypothyroidism (+3 points), diagnostic delay >2 weeks (+3 points), right ventricular dysfunction on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or echocardiography (+2 points), known diabetes mellitus (-3 points) and thrombolytic therapy or embolectomy for the acute PE event (-3 points) CTEPH is considered to be not present in patients with a low probability (≤6 points) and no symptoms suggestive of CTEPH, i.e. dyspnea on exertion, edema, newly developed palpitations, syncope or chest pains. The remaining patients with either high probability (>6 points) or who report symptoms that may be associated with CTEPH will be subjected to the 'rule-out criteria'. CTEPH will be assumed not present in patients with an age- and gender dependent normal NT-proBNP level (as defined by the assay's manufacturer), in the absence of these 3 ECG criteria: 1) rSR' or rSr' pattern in lead V1, 2) R:S >1 in lead V1 with R >0.5mV and 3) QRS axis >90o. Patients who have an abnormal result from the 'rule-out criteria' will be referred for transthoracic echocardiography. All echocardiograms will be judged by the echocardiographic criteria for suspected PH according to the 2015 ESC guidelines.

In case of echocardiographic intermediate or high probability of PH, patients will be referred for further diagnostic work-up of suspected CTEPH starting with perfusion lung scan or VQ-scan and right heart catheterization, of which the results will be discussed by an independent interdisciplinary working group of PH specialists, to ensure optimal diagnostic management. This latter diagnostic work-up of an abnormal echocardiograph lies within the setting of standard medical care.

All patients who were not diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension of any origin, or with NYHA class III or IV heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or significant valvular lesions, will be followed for a total of 2 years from the index PE diagnosis. During that period, the study protocol will not interfere with standard patient care, allowing diagnostic tests as deemed indicated by the treating physician including echocardiography in case of new respiratory symptoms. At the end of the follow-up period, all patients will be subjected to a second echocardiography that will be handled according to the above stated procedures to evaluate the presence of CTEPH.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients with an objectivated first or recurrent diagnosis of symptomatic acute PE, who have been treated for at least three months with therapeutically dosed anticoagulant therapy according to current guidelines;
  • Signed and dated informed consent of the subject available before the start of any specific study procedures;
  • Age ≥18 years;

Exclusion criteria

  • Known CTEPH or PH;
  • Known (i.e. echocardiographic confirmed) NYHA class III or IV chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction or significant valvular lesions;
  • Severe renal failure (eGFR <15 ml/min) or renal replacement therapy;
  • Medical or psychological condition that would not permit completion of the study or signing of informed consent, including life expectancy less than six months, or unwillingness to sign informed consent;
  • Non-compliance or inability to adhere to treatment or to the follow-up visits.

Treatment and study plan

'prediction score' and 'rule-out criteria'

Other

The combination of the 'prediction score' and the 'rule-out criteria' constitutes an accurate follow-up after PE aimed at diagnosing CTEPH in early stages.

Primary outcomes

  1. The accuracy of the screening algorithm to detect CTEPH, as reflected by the 2-year incidence of confirmed CTEPH in patients in whom CTEPH was initially considered not present based on the 'risk stratification score' and the 'rule out criteria'.

    Time frame: 2-year follow-up

    The primairy endpoint is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a CTEPH screening program based on the 'risk stratification score' and the 'rule out criteria'.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The cumulative incidence and incidence rate of CTEPH in the total study population with corresponding 95% confidence interval

    Time frame: 2-year follow-up

    The cumulative incidence and incidence rate of CTEPH in the total study population will be calculated with corresponding 95% confidence interval

  2. Feasibility of the screening algorithm, the number of necessary echocardiograms at baseline and the number of relevant echocardiographic findings at baseline, i.e. those that require treatment

    Time frame: 2-year follow-up

    number of necessary echocardiograms at baseline and the number of relevant echocardiographic findings at baseline, i.e. those that require treatment

  3. 3 Cost-effectiveness of the screening algorithm: a study-based cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA: diagnostic costs per early CTEPH diagnosis) and a model-based cost-utility analysis (CUA: societal costs per QALY).

    Time frame: 2-year follow-up

    cost-effectiveness of the strategy for standardized follow-up after PE aimed at diagnosing CTEPH in early stages.The economic evaluation will include a study-based cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA: diagnostic costs per early CTEPH diagnosis) and a model-based cost-utility analysis (CUA: societal costs per QALY).

  4. incremental diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiographically derived ECG-vectoranalysis on top of the manual ECG assessment by comparing the c-statistics and reclassification numbers between the manually and automatically assessed ECG parameters

    Time frame: 2-year follow-up

    The additional diagnostic accuracy of the electrocardiographically derived ECG-VCG will be assessed by comparing the c-statistics and reclassification numbers between the manually and automatically assessed ECG parameters in the algorithm.

  5. Inter-observer variability in the measurement of the RV/LV ratio on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) expressed as the kappa-value of the ventricular dimension measurements by two independent researchers.

    Time frame: 2-year follow-up

    Determination of the inter-observer variability in the measurement of the RV/LV ratio on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Leiden University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Early Non-invasive Detection of CTEPH After Pulmonary Embolism - The InShape-2 Study

Acronym: InShape2

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Sep 21, 2015
Registry last updated
Feb 9, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.