Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00828685

Early Functional Outcomes After Closed Reduction With Pinning Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Wrist Fractures

The purpose of this study is to compare early return to function in patients treated with closed reduction percutaneous pinning and open reduction internal fixation in displaced fractures of the distal radius.

Hypothesis: Wrist range of motion, grip strength and outcome at 2-3 months after injury are better in patients treated with open reduction, internal fixation (ORIF) than in patients treated with closed reduction percutaneous pinning techniques (CRPP). In addition patients treated with ORIF return to work at faster rates.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or greater
  • Patient functions independently
  • Dorsally displaced, extra-articular fracture (Colles' fracture); or simple intra-articular fracture with a single split between the scaphoid and lunate facets.
  • Isolated injury (no other injuries).
  • One of the following criteria:

Substantial initial displacement

  • Greater than 20 degrees dorsal angulation of the articular surface on the lateral view.
  • Greater than 100% loss of apposition.
  • Greater than 5 millimeters of shortening by ulnar variance on the posteroanterior radiograph.
  • Greater than 2 millimeters articular incongruity (step or gap).
  • Both dorsal and volar comminution. Inadequate initial manipulative reduction
  • Greater than 5 degrees of dorsal angulation of the articular surface on the lateral radiograph.
  • Greater than 3 millimeters of radial shortening by ulnar variance on the posteroanterior radiograph.
  • Greater than 2 millimeters articular incongruity.
  • Bayonett apposition of the volar cortex.
  • Less than 15 degrees of ulnarward inclination of the articular surface in the posteroanterior radiograph. Loss of reduction within 3 weeks of injury.
  • Any of the following changes in alignment from the initial post- reduction radiographs qualify:
  • 5 degrees or greater loss of palmar tilt of the articular surface on the lateral radiograph.
  • 2 millimeters or greater loss of radial height by ulnar variance on the posteroanterior radiograph.
  • 5 degrees or greater loss of ulnarward inclination of the articular surface of the distal radius on the posteroanteriorradiograph.
  • 2 millimeters or greater articular incongruity.

Exclusion criteria

  • More complex articular fractures (i.e. anything more than a simple sagittal split between the scaphoid and lunate facets).
  • Volarly displaced fractures.
  • Infirm patients.
  • Patients that rely on others for basic functional activities.
  • Open fractures
  • Fractures associated with neurovascular injury.
  • Fractures associated with major head, neurological, or visceral injuries that will inhibit the ability to participate in a structured exercise program.
  • Associated musculoskeletal injuries to the same arm.

Treatment and study plan

CRPP

Procedure

Closed reduction, percutaneous pinning

ORIF

Procedure

Open reduction, internal fixation

Primary outcomes

  1. Wrist range of motion measurement. As well as recorded score from the DASH questionnaire.

    Time frame: 3 months post surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Range of motion measured in wrist and a scored DASH questionnaire

    Time frame: 1 year after surgery

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Early Functional Outcomes After Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning vs. Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Important dates

First posted
Jan 26, 2009
Registry last updated
Feb 7, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.