Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07731490

Early Detection and IntervenTion in Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) occurs when the heart is no longer able to pump blood effectively throughout the body. This leads to symptoms that gradually worsen over time and are often mistaken for normal signs of aging. Because of its insidious onset, early detection is challenging. Both patients and healthcare professionals are often insufficiently aware of the early signs and symptoms of HF, resulting in delayed diagnosis. Consequently, timely initiation of treatments that could slow disease progression, improve quality of life, and reduce hospitalizations is often missed. Although a simple blood test measuring NT-proBNP levels can facilitate the early diagnosis of HF, it is not routinely used in clinical practice.

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a combined strategy for the early diagnosis and treatment of HF can reduce hospitalizations. This strategy includes:

1. increasing awareness of HF among patients and physicians, 2. using NT-proBNP testing for the early detection of HF in high-risk patients, and 3. promptly initiating guideline-directed HF treatment when the diagnosis is confirmed.

The researchers will assess whether this strategy effectively reduces hospitalizations due to acute heart failure over an 18-month follow-up period.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin II, Vienna, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Heart failure (HF) is a significant global health issue, affecting approximately 64 million individuals worldwide and resulting in over a million hospitalizations annually in Europe and the US. This imposes substantial healthcare costs exceeding $100 billion yearly, with about 70% attributed to acute hospitalizations. The aging population contributes to a rising burden, as HF is often diagnosed late, even in well-funded healthcare settings. Recent insights from studies, including the ongoing BASEL VIII study, challenge the assumption that undetected HF is primarily a failure to detect HF in primary care, revealing a high prevalence of undetected HF even among patients treated by cardiologists. This research initiative revealed that among patients ≥ 65 years, only 3% had known HF, while 29% had undetected HF. Similar observations were also noted in various high-risk settings worldwide, suggesting a surprisingly high rate of undetected HF in clinical practice. Late diagnosis is driven by gradual symptom development, non-specific symptoms often attributed to aging, insensitive clinical signs, and inadequate utilization of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) testing, the recommended tools for HF diagnosis. The misconception that HF competes with other cardiac diagnoses, rather than complementing them, further contributes to delayed diagnosis. Emerging evidence supports a strategy combining increased awareness, active surveillance using NT-proBNP testing for early HF diagnosis, and prompt treatment with approved evidence-based therapies to reduce HF hospitalizations. However, such intervention bundles are not systematically applied, as no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has ever investigated the efficacy of such structured interventions on hard outcomes. This research initiative aims to assess the effectiveness of an intervention bundle comprising increased awareness, early diagnostics, and early treatment to improve HF prognosis. The study aims to fill critical gaps and evaluate patient-centred outcomes, including hospitalization for acute HF, and health economic implications by using routine clinical data and the standard operating procedures as part of routine clinical practice in the participating sites. By addressing these challenges, the initiative seeks to enhance patient outcomes, reduce the burden on healthcare systems, and contribute to advancing HF care. The bundle intervention, comprising an educational program, guidelines-directed diagnostics, and guidelines-supported management, represents a proactive implementation of best clinical practice. As this proactive approach is not routinely implemented in real-world clinical dynamics, this study primarily focuses on accompanying the implementation of the intervention bundle and contributing valuable data regarding its efficacy. At the same time, the intervention is expected to offer a number of potential benefits for the patients, their health care providers, and the society in general. This will be achieved by a better understanding of the HF problem among patients and medical staff, better adherence to guidelines-supported best clinical practices, and the potential avoidance of hospitalisations due to acute HF.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • General consent (GC) has not been rejected.
  • Age ≥ 65 years.
  • Elective percutaneous coronary intervention* (PCI), pulmonary vein isolation* (PVI), pacemaker implantation* (PM, no cardiac resynchronisation), transcatheter aortic valve intervention* (TAVI), major non-cardiac surgery* or presenting with tachyarrhythmia to the emergency department (ED) (without a diagnosis of HF within 24h).
  • Exclusion criteria are assessed on day 1 after the procedure

Exclusion criteria

  • Systolic blood pressure ≤ 95 mmHg
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
  • Dementia documented in the medical history.
  • Metastatic cancer in the medical history.
  • Previously enrolled in this study.
  • Known HF.
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to SGLT2 Inhibitors / Loop Diuretics / MRA or is excipients.
  • Non-resident in the country of the recruiting site
  • Incapacity of the patient to make judgements
  • Patients not hospitalized overnight
  • Patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) or intermediate care (IMC) stay beyond 11:00 a.m. on the first postoperative day or any post-interventional stroke unit stay until 8:00 a.m. on the first postoperative day.
  • Patients died prior to postinterventional day 1 (8:00 a.m.)
  • Severe aortic or mitral stenosis

Treatment and study plan

Intervention bundle comprising increased awareness, early diagnostics, and early treatment to improve HF prognosis.

Other

The study aims to fill critical gaps and evaluate patient-centred outcomes, including hospitalization for acute HF, and health economic implications by using routine clinical data and the standard operating procedures as part of routine clinical practice in the participating sites.

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute HF event

    Time frame: 18 months after intervention

    Time from the index procedure to an acute HF event or follow-up date, together with binary variable indicating the occurrence of an acute Hf event. Acute HF event during index hospitalization is defined as acute HF severe enough to require admission to an intensive/intermediate care unit, non-invasive ventilation, or treatment with at least 40mg furosemide IV.

Secondary outcomes

  1. CV death or acute HF event

    Time frame: 18 months

    Time from index hospitalisation to acute HF event, CV death or follow-up date, together with binary variable indicating the occurrence of acute HF event or CV death.

  2. Hierarchical ordinal composite of CV death, acute HF hospitalization, acute HF during index hospitalization, and no event

    Time frame: 18 months

    Hierarchical ordinal composite of CV death, acute HF hospitalization, acute HF during index hospitalization, and no event (analyzed using the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld win ratio framework. Ties will be resolved according to the predefined event hierarchy. The effect measure will be the win ratio with 95% confidence intervals and two-sided p-values).

  3. All-cause death

    Time frame: 18 months

    Time from index hospitalisation to hospitalization for acute HF, death, or follow-up date, together with binary variable indicating the occurrence of hospitalization for acute HF or death.

  4. Cardiovascular death

    Time frame: 18 months

    Time from index hospitalisation to CV death or follow-up date, together with binary variable indicating CV death.

  5. All-cause hospitalizations

    Time frame: 18 months

    Time from index hospitalisation to hospitalization for acute HF, death, or follow-up date, together with binary variable indicating the occurrence of hospitalization for acute HF or death.

  6. Changes in medical treatment between the index hospitalisation

    Time frame: 18 months

    Categorical variables indicating changes in specific medical treatments. Changes in medication list (dosage, active pharmaceutical ingredient) during the periods of 1) before index presentation until discharge and 2) after discharge from the index hospitalization up to the 18-month follow-up period measured from the time of the intervention

  7. Change in kidney function

    Time frame: 18 months

    Standard blood tests obtained during routine clinical care like serum creatinine indicating changes in the kidney function.

  8. Health economic outcomes: cost of patient management

    Time frame: 18 months

    Cost of patient treatment within 18 months after the index hospitalisation, from different perspectives: hospital real costs perspective, full institutional perspective (considering real costs and reimbursements), healthcare payer perspective.

  9. Health economic outcome: cost-effectiveness in terms of cost per hospitalization for acute HF avoided

    Time frame: 18 months

    Cost of patient treatment within 18 months after the index hospitalisation and number of hospitalizations for acute HF within 18 months after the index hospitalisation.

Other outcomes

  1. Outcomes for implementation

    Time frame: 18 months

    Feasibility and Appropriateness of the implementation strategy according to Weiner et. al.

  2. Prevalence of undetected / untreated / suboptimal treated HF patients overall and in the different medical settings

    Time frame: 18 months

    Continuous variable representing the proportion of patients in the entire study population, this includes patients as well with exclusions criteria.

  3. Ratio between previously known and undetected HF overall and in the different medical settings, and the corresponding number needed to screen to detect one patient with undetected HF

    Time frame: 18 months

    Continuous variable representing the proportion of newly diagnosed HF patients to previously diagnosed HF cases again assed in the overall population, this includes patients as well with exclusions criteria.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Christian Müller, Prof. Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41 61 328 65 49

Sonja Horvat, Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Other

Registry information

Acronym: EDIT-HF

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2030
First posted
Jul 28, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.