Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01202253

Early Clinical Experience With Anidulafungin In Patients With Liver Disease In The United Kingdom

The purpose of this study is to describe the real world effectiveness of anidulafungin in clinical practice in a large Liver Unit in the United Kingdom.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

All subjects that have been treated with Anidulafungin according to its licence during the period of July 2009 and September 2010 will be included.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects who have been prescribed anidulafungin between 1st July 2009 and 30th September 2010.

Patients admitted to specialist liver unit wards and the Liver Intensive Therapy Unit during this period

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who participated in any interventional clinical trial during this episode of sepsis.

Patients who received anidulafungin for infection prophylaxis

Treatment and study plan

Anidulafungin

Drug

A single 200 mg loading dose should be administered on Day 1, followed by 100 mg daily thereafter.

Other names: ECALTA, ERAXIS

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Favorable Outcome

    Time frame: Day 28 post-treatment

    Favorable outcome was defined as favorable clinical response and documented or presumed microbial eradication (two negative follow-up blood cultures for bloodstream infections or a successful clinical response without follow-up cultures for other infections). Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Unfavorable Outcome

    Time frame: Day 28 post-treatment

    Unfavorable outcome was defined as the need to change to another antifungal agent because of lack of clinical response or death due to the antifungal infection or microbiologic persistence of the fungus or superinfection with a new Candida, Aspergillus or other fungal strain occurring at least 3 days and up to 14 days of anidulafungin therapy, or a lack of follow up data about clinical and microbiologic responses at the end of anidulafungin therapy.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to All Causes

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

    Death due to all causes included death attributable to fungal infection, death unrelated to fungal infection and death due to multiple causes.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Death Attributable to Fungal Infection

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  4. Percentage of Participants With Death Unrelated to Fungal Infection

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  5. Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response

    Time frame: Day 28 post-treatment

    Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Lack of Clinical Response

    Time frame: Day 28 post-treatment

    Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.

  7. Percentage of Participants Requiring Change or Additional Antifungal Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

  8. Percentage of Participants With Oral Antifungal Started to Complete Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  9. Percentage of Participants With Documented Eradication of Infecting Species

    Time frame: Baseline

    Documented microbial eradication was defined as 2 negative follow-up blood cultures for bloodstream infections.

  10. Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Signs of Infection According to Ultrasound Scan Results

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

    An ultrasound scan was performed and the resultant scan was reviewed for the presence of the infection as per investigator's discretion.

  11. Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Signs of Infection According to Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan Results

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

    A CT scan was performed and the resultant scan was reviewed for the presence of the infection as per investigator's discretion.

  12. Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Results for Liver Function at Initiation of Drug Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline

    Percentage of participants with abnormal liver function results were based on 4 liver function variables- bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase. Normal reference ranges of these variables are: plasma bilirubin: 3-17 micromoles/L or 2.5-10 mg/L for adults; aspartate transaminase: 6-34 International Units/Liter (IU/L) for females and 8-40 IU/L for males; alkaline phosphatase: 5-38 IU/L for females and 10-50 IU/L for males; gamma glutamyl transferase: 7-32 IU/L for females and 11-50 IU/L for males. Upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

  13. Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Results for Liver Function at End of Drug Therapy

    Time frame: Day 28 post-treatment

    Percentage of participants with abnormal liver function results were based on 4 liver function variables- bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase. Normal reference ranges of these variables are: plasma bilirubin: 3-17 micromoles/L or 2.5-10 mg/L for adults; aspartate transaminase: 6-34 IU/L for females and 8-40 IU/L for males; alkaline phosphatase: 5-38 IU/L for females and 10-50 IU/L for males; gamma glutamyl transferase: 7-32 IU/L for females and 11-50 IU/L for males.

  14. Percentage of Participants With Liver Function Test Results at Least Twice the Baseline Value During Period of Drug Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

    Percentage of participants with liver function test results at least twice the baseline value during period of drug therapy was calculated for the liver function variables, bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase.

  15. Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance at Least Twice the Baseline Value During Period of Drug Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  16. Percentage of Participants Admitted to Liver Intensive Therapy Unit (LITU)

    Time frame: Baseline

  17. Duration of Stay at Liver Intensive Therapy Unit (LITU)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  18. Percentage of Participants With Absolute Neutrophil Count Less Than 500 Per Cubic Millimeter (/mm^3) and Greater Than or Equal to 500 /mm^3

    Time frame: Baseline

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 and upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100, by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

  19. Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Bacterial or Viral Infection

    Time frame: Baseline

    Upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

  20. Percentage of Participants Prescribed With Systemic Antifungal Within 30 Days Before Study Start

    Time frame: Baseline

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

  21. Dose Changes for Immunosuppressant Drugs

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  22. Percentage of Participants With Probable or Proven Fungal Infection at the Initiation of Drug Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline

  23. Percentage of Participants With Documented Body Temperature Above 38.0 Degree Celsius or Below 36.0 Degree Celsius Within 24 Hour Period Prior to Initiation of Drug Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 and upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100, by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

  24. Percentage of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure More Than 2 Standard Deviations Below the Mean for Age Recorded Within 24 Hour Period Prior to Initiation of Drug Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

  25. Number of Participants With Infection Sites as Per Microbiological Analysis

    Time frame: Baseline

    Infection sites included blood, chest, urinary tract, intra-abdominal, bile duct, liver, kidney, mouth and esophagus.

  26. Number of Participants With Infection Sites as Per Ultrasound Scan and Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan

    Time frame: Baseline

  27. Infecting Organisms by Species

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 14 post-treatment

  28. Percentage of Participants With Prior Colonization With Candida by Species

    Time frame: Baseline

    Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).

  29. Percentage of Participants With Prior Colonization With Candida by Colonization Index

    Time frame: Baseline

  30. Percentage of Participants With Other Prior Fungal Infection by Species and Colonization Index

    Time frame: Baseline

  31. Number of Participants Who Received Water-based and Ethanol-based Formulation

    Time frame: Baseline

  32. Percentage of Participants Who Received Water-based and Ethanol-based Formulation

    Time frame: Baseline

  33. Percentage of Participants Who Received 200 mg Loading Dose

    Time frame: Day 1

  34. Percentage of Participants Who Received 100 mg Dose on Day 2

    Time frame: Day 2

  35. Percentage of Participants Who Received 200 mg Dose on Day 1 and 100 mg for All Subsequent Doses

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  36. Number of Participants With Other Dosing Patterns

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

    The other dosing patterns for anidulafungin included any dosing pattern different from 200 mg loading dose on Day 1 followed by 100 mg doses subsequently starting from Day 2.

  37. Duration of Anidulafungin Therapy

    Time frame: Baseline

  38. Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

    Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment was considered an adverse event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An AE resulting in any of the following outcomes, or deemed to be significant for any other reason, was considered to be a SAE: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; a life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

  39. Percentage of Participants With One or More Drug-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

  40. Number of Participants With Different Types of Drug-related Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Study To Describe The Early Clinical Experience With Anidulafungin In Patients With Liver Disease At King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2011
First posted
Sep 15, 2010
Registry last updated
Apr 16, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.