Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07121400

E-learning Teaching During Anesthesia Residency

E-learning is in expansion although its pedagogical performance has not been validated in the anesthesia residency. E-learning can be divided into passive e-learning; guided e-learning, interactive e-learning, and adaptive e-learning. The objective was to compare the impact of passive e-learning versus interactive e-learning on anesthesia residents' acquisition of theoretical knowledge and clinical reasoning.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

The participants first have a pre-test consisting of a clinical case and a script concordance test (SCT). The clinical case was designed to evaluate theoretical clinical knowledge. The clinical case scored 50 points and consisted of 4 open-ended questions (12,5 points for each question) on the management and complications of the diabetic patient in anesthesia. The SCT consisted of 15 questions on the management of the diabetic patient in anesthesia (degenerative neuropathy, ischemic cardiopathy, intubation, management of hyperglycemia, postoperative complications) and was also scored out of 50 points. The participants had 15 minutes for the clinical case and 15 minutes for the SCT.

The pre-test was conducted in a double-blind way, each participant did not know in which group they would be. Each test had a double-blind correction by two senior anesthesiologists. The participants were then randomized to either the Interactive-EL group (Int-EL group) or a Passive-EL group (Pass-EL group).

The Int-EL group had full access to a pedagogical internet platform with online documents; national experts' recommendations on the management of diabetic patients in anesthesia, slide presentation lectures on the topic by local university teachers, and, the possibility to contact a virtual mentor (anaesthesiologist of our department) by email for interactive discussion or questions about the topic.

The Pass-EL group only received by email the documents (French experts' recommendations and slide presentation lectures on the management of diabetic patients in anesthesia) and did not have access to the pedagogical internet platform. The e-learning training period was one month for both groups. The investigators then conducted, in both groups, a post-test composed of the same clinical case and the same SCT.

The time allotted for the post-test was identical to that of the pre-test, and students were not allowed to access external resources during either test.

Each test had a double-blind grading by two senior anesthesiologists.

The tests were developed by two experts in anesthesiology and medical education within our department. The participants in the Pass-EL group had the option to access the platform at the end of the study to complete the e-learning course, should they choose to do so.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All anesthesiology residents from first to fourth year in both centers (participants)

Exclusion criteria

  • Exclusion criteria included residents missing the pre-or post-tests or refusing to participate in the training program.

Treatment and study plan

Interactive e-learning-group

Procedure

The Interactive-E-learning group had full access to a pedagogical internet platform with online documents; national experts' recommendations on the management of diabetic patients in anesthesia, slide presentation lectures on the topic by local university teachers, and, the possibility to contact a virtual mentor (anaesthesiologist of our department) by email for interactive discussion or questions about the topic.

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the theoretical clinical knowledge score between the two e-learning groups

    Time frame: One month after pre-test

    The score used was the means of the paired within-subject differences (delta) of clinical knowledge scores (pre-and post-test). The score could range from 0 to 50 points.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The comparison of clinical reasoning scores between the two e-learning groups

    Time frame: one month

    Evaluated by the paired within-subject differences (delta) SCT scores (pre-and post-test). The score could range from 0 to 50 points.

  2. Self-reported difficulty in accessing the pedagogical platform for the Int-EL group and the access to the documents for the Pass-EL group.

    Time frame: one month

    "easy", "medium to difficult" and "difficult"

  3. Self-reported difficulty to validate the MCQs felt by the students of the Int-EL group.

    Time frame: one month

    "easy", "medium to difficult" and "difficult"

  4. Self-reported e-learning usage between the two e-learning groups of the means.

    Time frame: One month

    The reporting time of e-learning usage was in minutes

  5. Student satisfaction score between the two e-learning groups

    Time frame: One month

    Satisfaction score ranging from 0 to 10.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Rouen

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Pedagogical Impact of Different Levels of E-learning Teaching During Anesthesia Residency: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Aug 13, 2025
Registry last updated
Aug 13, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.