Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01249417

Dysport® Pediatric Lower Limb Spasticity Study

The purpose of this research study is to determine whether Dysport® is effective in the treatment of increased stiffness of the calf muscles and to evaluate the safety of this treatment in children with Cerebral Palsy. In addition this study will also check whether Dysport® can lessen the pain caused by spasticity and improve the child's wellbeing.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

2 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Club De Leones Cruz Del Sur Rehabilitation Corporation, Punta Arenas, Punta Arenas, Chile

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Children aged 2 to 17 years with cerebral palsy
  • Equinus foot position
  • Ambulatory
  • Intensity of muscle tone equal to or greater than 2 in affected lower limb, as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale

Exclusion criteria

  • Fixed contracture
  • Previous phenol, alcohol injection or surgical intervention
  • Other neurological / neuromuscular disorder
  • Severe athetoid or dystonic movements

Treatment and study plan

Botulinum toxin type A

Biological

I.M. (in the muscle) injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.

Other names: AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)

Placebo

Drug

I.M. injection on day 1 of a single treatment cycle.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in MAS Score in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) at the Ankle Joint of the (Most) Affected Lower Limb

    Time frame: Change from baseline to Week 4

    The MAS is a 6-point scale which measures the intensity of muscle tone by measuring the resistance of the muscle to passive lengthening or stretching. Investigator will grade muscle tone in the GSC from 0 (no increase in tone) to 4 (affected parts rigid in flexion or extension).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of the Treatment Response.

    Time frame: Week 4

    PGA Scale of the Treatment Response: Global assessment of treatment response assessed by asking the Investigator the following question: "how would you rate the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb(s) since the last injection?" Answers will be made on a 9 point rating scale (-4: markedly worse, -3: much worse, -2: worse, -1: slightly worse, 0: no change, +1: slightly improved, +2: improved, +3: much improved, +4: markedly improved).

  2. Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) Score

    Time frame: Week 4

    GAS is a functional scale used to measure progress towards individual therapy goals. Individual goals defined for each subject by the physician, and the child's parents (caregiver) where applicable, prior to treatment. Post-baseline, the GAS for each goal rated using a defined scale (-2: Much less than expected outcome, -1: somewhat less than expected outcome, 0: expected outcome, 1: somewhat more than expected outcome, and 2: Much more than expected outcome).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ipsen

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III, Multicentre, Double Blind, Prospective, Randomised, Placebo Controlled Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of DYSPORT® Used in the Treatment of Lower Limb Spasticity in Children With Dynamic Equinus Foot Deformity Due to Cerebral Palsy

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Nov 29, 2010
Registry last updated
Sep 28, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.