Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02810795

Dynamic Stress Perfusion CT for Detection of Inducible Myocardial Ischemia

The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MPICT for the detection of hemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis (as determined by invasive FFR) in patients with suspected or known CAD clinically referred for invasive angiography.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

21 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

ErasmusMC

Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015CE, Netherlands

About this study

Rationale: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) provides accurate assessment of the coronary arteries and detects significant coronary stenosis with high diagnostic accuracy. However, the hemodynamic relevance of these stenotic lesion remains unclear, although highly relevant for clinical decision-making. Recent technical developments with third-generation dual-source CT allow to determine myocardial perfusion during hyperemia and thus for assessment of the hemodynamic relevance of coronary lesions using a dynamic acquisition mode. To date, there is only very limited evidence of the feasibility of this approach stemming from single-center studies with varying standards of reference.

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of MPICT for the detection of hemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis (as determined by invasive FFR) in patients with suspected or known CAD clinically referred for invasive angiography. In an optional sub-study the diagnostic accuracy of MPICT for the detection of myocardial perfusion defects as determined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) will be investigated.

Study design: Observational cohort study with fractional flow reserve (FFR) during invasive angiography as the reference standard.

Study population: Patients with known or suspected CAD clinically referred for invasive angiography.

Main study parameters: Myocardial perfusion defect on dynamic CT perfusion imaging, and diagnostic accuracy as compared invasive FFR.

Co Principle Investigators Koen Nieman MD PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center Fabian Bamberg MD PhD, University of Tübingen.

Investigators Valerie Schmidt-Honndorf PhD, University of Tübingen Tobias Geisler MD PhD, University of Tübingen Joost Daemen MD PhD, Erasmus University Medical Center Adriaan Coenen MD, Erasmus University Medical Center Stephan Achenbach MD PhD, Erlangen University Micheala M. Hell MD, Erlangen University Rozemarijn Vliegenthart MD PhD, UMC Groningen Pim van der Harst MD PhD, UMC Groningen Francesca Pugliese MD PhD, Queen Mary University of London Kakuya Kitagawa MD PhD, Mie University Hatem Alkadhi MD PhD, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland Robert Manka MD PhD, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 21-75 years
  • Stable angina symptoms, suspected or known CAD, and referred for invasive angiography on clinical grounds.
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Ability to perform a 20-30 second breath hold

Exclusion criteria

  • Hemodynamically and clinically unstable condition (angina at rest, malignant arrhythmias)
  • Prior, documented myocardial infarction, other than (procedure related) minor type II myocardial infarction, which includes Q waves on the ECG or evidence of myocardial infarction on prior non-invasive imaging.
  • Prior stenting or coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  • Significant other cardiovascular conditions affecting the interpretation of MPICT, including, but not limited to: clinical heart failure, IECD (pacemaker/ICD), severe valvular heart disease or prosthetic valves, significant intra-cardiac shunting or other relevant congenital heart disease.
  • eGFR<60 ml/kg/min
  • BMI>30 kg/m2, or weight >120 kg.
  • Atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmia, >6 ectopic beats / min
  • Known or suspected allergy to iodinated contrast medium
  • Pregnancy cannot be excluded
  • Contra-indications for adenosine: bronchial asthma, second or third degree atrioventricular block, blood pressure <110/70 mmHg, allergies or severe side effects in the past.

Treatment and study plan

Diagnostic detection of coronary artery disease

Other

Myocardial perfusion defect on dynamic CT perfusion imaging, and diagnostic accuracy as compared invasive FFR.

Primary outcomes

  1. Myocardial perfusion

    Time frame: For each patient within 4 weeks of the CT perfusion acquisition

    invasive fractional flow reserve measurement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Presence of myocardial perfusion defect on MPIMRI

    Time frame: For each patient within 1 week before invasive fractional flow reserve measurement

  2. Per patient assessment of hemodynamically significant CAD

    Time frame: For each patient within 4 weeks of the CT perfusion acquisition

  3. Ischemia per standardized myocardial segment

    Time frame: For each patient within 4 weeks of the CT perfusion acquisition

  4. Coronary stenosis by CTA per territory (branch)

    Time frame: For each patient within 4 weeks of the CT perfusion acquisition

  5. Coronary stenosis by invasive angiography per territory (branch)

    Time frame: For each patient within 4 weeks of the CT perfusion acquisition

  6. Demographics.

    Time frame: For each patient within 1 week before invasive fractional flow reserve measurement

  7. Cardiovascular risk factors

    Time frame: For each patient within 1 week before invasive fractional flow reserve measurement

  8. 'Image quality, based on the DICOM images measured by experienced readers."

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 to 2 years

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • Bayer
  • Mie University
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Siemens Medical Solutions
  • University Hospital Munich
  • University Hospital Tuebingen
  • University Hospital, Zürich
  • University Medical Center Groningen
  • University of Erlangen-Nürnberg

Registry information

Acronym: SPECIFIC

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jun 23, 2016
Registry last updated
Dec 11, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.