Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00569270

Dynamic Hyperinflation and Tiotropium

We will detect dynamic hyperinflation (DH) in 40 COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) patients with moderately severe disease using metronome paced hyperventilation (MPH) with inspiratory capacity as the primary end point. Hypothesis: Is tiotropium capable of lung volume protecting inspiratory capacity from MPH induced DH vs placebo in a randomized crossover double blinded study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Noe Zamel MD, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Study completed with 29 patients studied. Data is being analyzed to evaluate trough and peak effect of 18 µg tiotropium vs placebo on FEV 1 (L)(forced expiratory capacity in one second), inspiratory capacity and functional residual volume. In addition, we will study the effect of 18 µg tiotropium vs placebo on metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation. We will also evaluate the effect of tiotropium induced increase in IC (inspiratory capacity) vs extent of emphysema as evaluated on high resolution thin section CT lung

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Moderately severe COPD patients age 40-85 yr with post 180ug albuterol FEV 1 between 60 and 79% predicted and FEV 1/FVC < 70%.
  • Smoking history > 10 pack yr.
  • Clinically stable X 6 weeks.
  • No oxygen usage.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of asthma
  • Clinically unstable
  • Any other significant medical problem precluding full cooperation for study

Treatment and study plan

Placebo

Drug

Procedure/Surgery - tiotropium 18ug capsule daily for 1 month vs placebo to study the effect of trough and peak effect on bronchodilation and effect of metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation

Primary outcomes

  1. Bronchodilator Response:Peak FEV1(L)(Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second)-

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies (mean +/- SD): peak FEV1 (+2h) after 30 days of placebo or tiotropium in 29 moderate COPD patients. FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in one second

  2. Bronchodilator Response:Peak FRC (L) (Functional Residual Capacity)

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies (mean +/- SD): peak FRC after 30 days (+2h) of placebo or tiotropium in 29 moderate COPD patients.

  3. Bronchodilator Response: Peak FVC (L) (Forced Vital Capacity)- Tiotropium and Placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) of peak forced vital capaciy (L) after 30 days (+2h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Forced vital capacity - liters

  4. Bronchodilator Response: Peak IC (L) - (Inspiratory Capacity) - Tiotropium Versus Placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) - Peak inspiratory capacity after 30 days (+2h)of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Inspiratory capacity- liters

  5. Bronchodilator Response: Peak FRC/TLC Percentage (Functional Residual Capacity(L)/Total Lung Capacity(L) - Tiotropium or Placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies (mean +/- SD) peak Peak FRC/TLC after 30 days (+2h)of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Functional residual capacity/total lung capacity - percentage

  6. Bronchodilator Response: Peak TLC (L) (Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium or Placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Net change in lung function studies (mean +/- SE) from baseline to trough (-1h) and peak (+2h) after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Total lung capacity - liters

  7. Bronchodilator Response: Trough FEV1 (L)- (Forced Expiratory Volume) Tiotropium Versus Placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies Trough FEV1(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Forced expiratory volume in 1s (liters)

  8. Bronchodilator Response: Trough FRC (L)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies Trough FRC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients. Functional residual capacity(liters)

  9. Bronchodilator Response: Trough FVC (L)- (Forced Vital Capacity) Tiotropium Versus Placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies Trough FVC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients

  10. Bronchodilator Response: Trough IC (L) Inspiratory Capacity - Tiotropium Versus Placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies (Trough IC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients Trough inspiratory capacity- liters

  11. Bronchodilator Response: Trough FRC/TLC (Functional Residual Capacity/Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies Trough FRC/TLC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients Trough Functional residual capacity/total lung capacity - percentage

  12. Bronchodilator Response: Trough TLC (L) (Total Lung Capacity)- Tiotropium Versus Placebo

    Time frame: 30 days

    Lung function studies Trough TLC(mean +/- SD) after 30 days(-1h) of tiotropium versus placebo in 29 moderate COPD patients

  13. IC (Inspiratory Capacity L)and Metronome Paced Hyperventilation-induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo and Baseline

    Time frame: baseline and 30 days (+2h) post dose

    IC measurement before and after metronome paced hyperventilation-induced dynamic hyperinflation at baseline and in tiotropium and placebo groups. Measure ratio of functional residual capacity divided by total lung capacity at baseline and after 30 days of tiotropium versus placebo

  14. TLC (L) Before and After Metronome Paced Hyperventilation Induced Dynamic Hyperinflation in Tiotropium Cohort Versus Placebo

    Time frame: one hour before intervention & 2 hrs. after after 30 days

    Total lung capacity before and after metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation in tiotropium cohort versus placebo. Difference between TLC measured at one hour before intervention & 2 hrs. after after 30 days of treatment with either placebo or tiotropium

Secondary outcomes

  1. Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema and and Lung Function of FEV1(l) After Tiotropium

    Time frame: baseline to 30 days

    Correlation between improved lung function after tiotropium and extent of lung CT scored emphysema with respect to FEV 1; correlation of tiotropium induced bronchodilation and extent of lung ct scored emphysema; measures include increase in FEV1 from baseline to peak tiotropium

  2. IC (Inspiratory Capacity, L) Post Mph (Metronome Paced Hyperventilation) Induced dh (Dynamic Hyperinflation) After Tiotropium and Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema

    Time frame: baseline to 30 days

    Correlation between change in inspiratory capacity (L) post metronome paced hyperventilation induced dynamic hyperinflation and extent of lung ct scored emphysema

  3. Extent of Lung CT Scored Emphysema and and Lung Function of FRC/TLC (Functional Residual Capacity(L)/Total Lung Capacity (L) After Tiotropium

    Time frame: baseline to trough tiotropium

    Correlation between improved lung function after tiotropium and extent of lung CT scored emphysema with respect to ratio functional residual capacity divided by total lung capacity. Specifically, correlation of tiotropium induced bronchodilation and extent of lung ct scored emphysema

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gelb, Arthur F., M.D.

Indiv

Collaborators

  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Pfizer

Registry information

Official study title

Simplified Detection of Dynamic Hyperinflation Using Metronome Paced Hyperventilation and the Effect of Tiotropium in Patients With COPD

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Dec 7, 2007
Registry last updated
Aug 20, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.