Dupilumab SAR231893
DrugPharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous
NCT Number: NCT04678856
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on computerized tomography (CT) scan in the dupilumab group only
Secondary Objectives:
* To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on CT scan and sinus total symptom score (sTSS) compared to placebo * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab in CRSsNP patients compared to placebo * To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dupilumab in CRSsNP patients compared to placebo * Assessment of immunogenicity to dupilumab over time compared to placebo
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Investigational Site Number : 0320002, Buenos Aires, Argentina
The duration of study for each participant will include 2-4 weeks of screening period, 24-52 weeks randomized investigational medicinal product (IMP) intervention period and 12 weeks of follow-up period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous
Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
The sTSS is a composite score derived from the following individual items: nasal congestion (NC), anterior/posterior rhinorrhea, and facial pain/pressure. Each of the individual items were scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). The total score ranges from 0 to 9 and consists of the sum of NC, the averaged rhinorrhea item scores, and facial pain/pressure scores. Higher scores on sTSS indicated greater overall symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication.
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to the last dose of study drug administration (373 days) + 98 days, up to 471 days
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs were AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24 and 52
Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to evaluate serum concentration of dupilumab.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52
Plasma samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to dupilumab. Pre-existing immunoreactivity was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay at baseline with all post first dose ADA results negative, OR an ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than 4-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment-emergent ADA responses were defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results were negative or missing. Treatment-boosted response was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay post first dose that was greater-than or equal to 4-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results were positive. Samples positive in the ADA assay were further characterized for the presence of NAbs.
Sanofi
Industry
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Uncontrolled, Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyposis (CRSsNP)
Acronym: Liberty CRSsNP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07198607
Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis), Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps
Varese, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06013241
Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06118554
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06691113
Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details