Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04684524

Dupilumab in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS) (LIBERTY-AFRS-AI)

Primary Objective:

* To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab to reduce sinus opacification in a population with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS)

Secondary Objectives:

* To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab to reduce sinus opacification in a population with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) at Week 24 * To assess the efficacy of dupilumab to reduce the need for rescue treatments * To evaluate the efficacy of treatment with dupilumab in improving symptoms in AFRS * To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab to reduce nasal polyp formation in participants with AFRS * To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving overall symptom severity and quality of life in AFRS * To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in improving sense of smell in participants with AFRS * To explore the effect of dupilumab as assessed by three-Dimensional CT volumetric measurement of the paranasal sinuses * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of dupilumab when administered to participants with AFRS * To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dupilumab in participants with AFRS * To characterize the effect of dupilumab on total IgE and specific IgE * To assess immunogenicity to dupilumab in participants with AFRS

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

6 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Investigational Site Number : 0320001, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The duration of study for each participant will include 2-4 weeks of screening period (2 additional weeks could be allowed), 52 weeks of randomized investigational medicinal product (IMP) intervention period and 12 weeks of follow-up period.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Participant must be at least 6 years of age (or the minimum legal age for adolescents in the country of the investigational site) at the time of signing the informed consent.

Participants with the diagnosis of AFRS adapted from criteria by Bent and Kuhn (meeting all):

  • IgE mediated inflammatory response to fungal hyphae (specific IgE serology or skin test) Evidence of sensitization to fungus by skin testing (at screening or documented historical positive skin test in the previous 12 months), or positive fungal-specific IgE in serum at screening.
  • Nasal polyposis confirmed by nasal endoscopy at screening.
  • Characteristic CT signs to be performed during screening period and can include any of the below signs as assessed by central reader:
  • hyperdensities
  • bony demineralization
  • bone erosion of sinus
  • Eosinophilic mucin/mucus identified within 5 years prior to screening or at screening with or without positive fungal stain

AFRS patients with the following:

  • An endoscopic NPS of at least 2 out of 4 for unilateral polyps or 3 out of 8 for bilateral polyps at Visit 1 (central reading) and Visit 2 (local reading) and,
  • Sinus opacification in CT scan with an LMK score of 9 for patients with unilateral polyps or 12 for patients with bilateral polyps during screening period and,

Body weight ≥15 kg

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with nasal conditions/concomitant nasal diseases making them non-evaluable at Visit 1 or for the primary efficacy
  • Nasal cavity malignant tumor and benign tumors.
  • Known of fungal invasion into sinus tissue.
  • Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the investigator's judgment, would adversely affect the patient's participation in the study
  • Active tuberculosis or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection, or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis unless documented adequately treated.
  • Diagnosed active endoparasitic infections; suspected or high risk of endoparasitic infection
  • Known or suspected immunodeficiency
  • Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the Screening Visit 1 or during the screening period.
  • History of systemic hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis to dupilumab or any of its excipients.
  • Treatment with commercially available dupilumab within 12 months, participation in prior dupilumab clinical trial, or discontinued dupilumab use due to adverse event.
  • Patients who are treated with intranasal corticosteroid drops; intranasal steroid emitting devices/stents; nasal spray using exhalation delivery system, such as Xhance™, during screening period.
  • Patients who are on intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) spray unless they have received stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients who have undergone sinus intranasal surgery (including polypectomy) within 6 months prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients who have taken:
  • Biologic therapy/systemic immunosuppressant to treat inflammatory disease or autoimmune disease within 5 half-lives prior to Visit 1
  • Any investigational mAb within 5 half-lives prior to Visit 1
  • Anti-IgE therapy (omalizumab) within 4 months prior to Visit 1. - Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1
  • Leukotriene antagonists/modifiers unless patient is on a continuous treatment for at least 30 days prior to Visit 1.
  • Initiation of allergen immunotherapy within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or a plan to begin therapy or change its dose during the screening or treatment period. - Patients received SCS during screening period. - Either intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and/or plasmapheresis within 30 days prior to Screening Visit (Visit 1).

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Treatment and study plan

Dupilumab SAR231893

Drug

Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous

Placebo

Drug

Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

    The LMK score is used to quantify the degree of opacification of each sinus on CT scan. The CT scan LMK staging system represents the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus plus the osteomeatal complex on each side). The extent of sinus opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the osteomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified) corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the osteomeatal complexes bilaterally. Higher score indicate worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endoscopy Nasal Polyp Score (NPS)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

    The bilateral endoscopy NPS is determined by the clinician who assesses nasal polyp formation. Polyps on each side of the nose are graded based on polyp size; scores: 0 = no polyps; 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate and 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction. The total score is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no obstruction) to 8 (complete obstruction); higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

    The LMK score is used to quantify the degree of opacification of each sinus on CT scan. The CT scan LMK staging system represents the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus plus the osteomeatal complex on each side). The extent of sinus opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the osteomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified) corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the osteomeatal complexes bilaterally. Higher score indicate worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Total Symptom Score (TSS) Derived From the Nasal Symptom Diary

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. The TSS is a composite score consisting of the sum of the following symptoms assessed daily in the morning: nasal congestion/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, rhinorrhea (average of anterior/posterior nasal discharge). Each of the individual items were scored from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe symptoms. TSS is the sum of individual items and ranges between 0 = no symptoms and 9 = severe symptoms. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

    The UPSIT (UPSIT 40 odorant test) is a rapid and easy-to-administer method to quantitatively assess human olfactory function. The test consists of 4 booklets, each containing 10 odorants with 1 odorant per page. Above each odorant strip is a multiple-choice question with 4 alternative words to describe the odor and the participant is asked to indicate which word best describes the odor. Each smell has a possible of 4 answers with one being correct, therefore the potential total scores can range from 0 (worst possible score) to 40 (best possible score), with 1 point being awarded for each correctly identified odor. Scores of <=18 were classified as anosmia, 19 to 25 as severe microsmia, 26 to 30 as moderate microsmia, 31 to 34 as mild microsmia, and 35 to 40 as normal smell appreciation. Higher scores indicated better olfactory function; i.e. better sense of smell. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Monthly Average Decreased/Loss of Smell Using the Nasal Symptom Diary

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 24

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Decreased/loss of smell is scored as: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Endoscopy NPS

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

    The bilateral endoscopy NPS is determined by the clinician who assesses nasal polyp formation. Polyps on each side of the nose are graded based on polyp size; scores: 0 = no polyps; 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle turbinate; 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate; 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle turbinate and 4 = large polyps causing complete obstruction. The total score is the sum of the right and left nostrils, ranging from 0 (no obstruction) to 8 (complete obstruction); higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  8. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average Nasal Congestion/Obstruction Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

  9. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Total Score

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

    The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of CRS on participants health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and has 22 items covering symptoms, social/emotional impact, productivity, and sleep consequences of CRS. The recall period is past 2 weeks. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale; response options ranging from 0 = no problem to 5 = problem as bad as it can be. A global score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 110 (severe impact) is calculated by summing the responses to all items; higher score indicates greater rhinosinusitis-related health burden; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Three-dimensional CT Total Volume Occupied by Disease in All Sinuses

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

    This method is used to calculate the percent occupied by disease. It is performed at locations including ethmoid sinus, frontal sinus, maxillary sinus, and sphenoid sinus. The total volume occupied by disease in all sinuses is reported here. For the analysis, central reading at baseline was used for comparison with Week 52 reading. It is graded on a scale of 0-100%; a higher score is worse and indicates greater volume occupied by disease. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  11. Percentage of Participants Who Received Systemic Corticosteroids (SCS) and/or Underwent or Planned to Undergo Surgery for Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS) at Week 52

    Time frame: Week 52

    SCS use was defined as the use of SCS for rescue treatment of AFRS or for another reason and was captured by the Investigator (or designee) in electronic case report form (eCRF). Participants who underwent or planned to undergo surgery for AFRS were also recorded in eCRF.

  12. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SNOT-22 Total Score

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24

    The SNOT-22 is a validated questionnaire designed to assess the impact of CRS on participants HRQoL and has 22 items covering symptoms, social/emotional impact, productivity, and sleep consequences of CRS. The recall period is past 2 weeks. Each item is rated on a 6-point Likert scale; response options ranging from 0 = no problem to 5 = problem as bad as it can be. A global score ranging from 0 (no impact) to 110 (severe impact) is calculated by summing the responses to all items; higher score indicates greater rhinosinusitis-related health burden; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  13. Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Total Immunoglobulin-E (IgE) to Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of IgE. Total IgE was measured with a quantitative method approved for diagnostic testing; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  14. Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in the Monthly Average Rhinorrhea Score From the Nasal Symptom Diary

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Weeks 24 and 52

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Score range: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Severity of rhinorrhea (average of anterior [runny nose]/posterior nasal discharge [post-nasal drip]) is presented here. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

  15. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average TSS Derived From the Nasal Symptom Diary

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. The TSS is a composite score consisting of the sum of the following symptoms assessed daily in the morning: nasal congestion/obstruction, decreased/loss of sense of smell, rhinorrhea (average of anterior/posterior nasal discharge). Each of the individual items were scored from 0 = no symptoms to 3 = severe symptoms. TSS is the sum of individual items and ranges between 0 = no symptoms and 9 = severe symptoms. Higher scores on the TSS indicate greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

  16. Change From Baseline to Weeks 24 and 52 in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Rhinosinusitis

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 52

    The rhinosinusitis VAS is used to evaluate the overall severity of the rhinosinusitis. It is a recommended scale to determine the participant's disease severity and to guide the treatment for CRS. The participant is asked to answer the following question: "How troublesome are your symptoms of your rhinosinusitis" on a 10-centimeter VAS from 0 = not troublesome to 10 = worst thinkable troublesome. Based on their score on the VAS, the severity of rhinosinusitis is divided into 3 categories as follows: mild = VAS 0 to 3, moderate = VAS >3 to 7 and severe = VAS >7 to 10; higher score indicating worse outcome; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  17. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in UPSIT

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

    The UPSIT (UPSIT 40 odorant test) is a rapid and easy-to-administer method to quantitatively assess human olfactory function. The test consists of 4 booklets, each containing 10 odorants with 1 odorant per page. Above each odorant strip is a multiple-choice question with 4 alternative words to describe the odor and the participant is asked to indicate which word best describes the odor. Each smell has a possible of 4 answers with one being correct, therefore the potential total scores can range from 0 (worst possible score) to 40 (best possible score), with 1 point being awarded for each correctly identified odor. Scores of <=18 were classified as anosmia, 19 to 25 as severe microsmia, 26 to 30 as moderate microsmia, 31 to 34 as mild microsmia, and 35 to 40 as normal smell appreciation. Higher scores indicated better olfactory function, i.e. better sense of smell. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  18. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Monthly Average Decreased/Loss of Smell Using the Nasal Symptom Diary

    Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1) and Week 52

    The nasal symptom diary is designed to assess the severity of CRS nasal symptoms on daily basis. Decreased/loss of smell is scored as: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild symptoms (symptoms clearly present, but minimal awareness and easily tolerated), 2= moderate symptoms (definite awareness of symptoms that is bothersome but tolerable) and 3 = severe symptoms (symptoms that are hard to tolerate, cause interference with activities or daily living). Higher scores denote greater symptom severity; a negative change from baseline indicate improvement. Baseline was defined as the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug.

  19. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of follow-up per participant, up to approximately 64 weeks

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was a medically important event. TEAEs were AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period.

  20. Serum Concentration of Dupilumab Over Time

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24 and 52

    Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to obtain serum concentration of dupilumab.

  21. Percent Change From Baseline in Fungal-specific IgE at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of fungal-specific IgE which was measured with a quantitative method approved for diagnostic testing; a negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Baseline was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.

  22. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Dupilumab

    Time frame: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to end of follow-up per participant, up to approximately 64 weeks

    Plasma samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to dupilumab. Treatment-emergent ADA responses were defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results were negative or missing.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sanofi

Industry

Collaborators

  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Parallel Group Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Patients With Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS)

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 24, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.