Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
NCT Number: NCT04804371
The variable clinical outcome of patients with G2 & G3 well diff GEP-NETs makes the selection of an optimal treatment strategy challenging.
Initial data suggests that high DOTATATE uptake and low FDG uptake are suggestive of low grade disease, with an indolent course.
Conversely, low DT uptake and high FDG uptake are suggestive of high-grade/ aggressive disease.
G2/3 GEP NETs may be biologically diverse; clinically relevant cohort for dual-tracer PET imaging.
Our secondary objectives are
1. To determine the distribution of PETNET scores derived from 18F-FDG & 68Ga-DT PET in patients with G2 & G3 well diff GEP-NETs. 2. To determine the proportion of patients in whom the addition of 18F-FDG PET data results in a change in planned clinical management.
To assess intra-individual variability in SSTR expression & glucose metabolism (as seen on DT and FDG PET) across different tumor sites within the same patient.
2) To determine whether a correlation exists between tumor texture features on 68Ga-DT & FDG PET to tumor grade and Ki 67 index.
3) To assess for an association between tumor texture features on 68Ga-DT PET and glucose metabolism; and/or an association between tumor texture features on FDG PET and SSTR expression.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
The variable clinical outcome of patients with G2 and G3 well differentiated GEP-NETs makes the selection of an optimal treatment strategy challenging.
A subject with 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake on all lesions without FDG uptake is likely to have low-grade, metabolically inactive disease, leading to an indolent disease course and may also be a predictive biomarker in subjects being considered for PRRT.
Conversely, avidity on 18F-FDG PET/CT and non-avidity on 68Ga-DOTATATE may indicate a high-grade NET, and would predict resistance to PRRT, suggesting that a more "aggressive" approach with systemic chemotherapy might be beneficial.
Therefore, the prospective assessment of PETNET score in patients with G2 or G3 GEP NETs, which may be biologically diverse is the most clinically relevant group for dual-tracer PET imaging.
Primary Objectives:
Secondary Objectives:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Evaluate FDG uptake
Time frame: 2 years
Discordance in tracer uptake as assessed by PETNET score distribution: Proportion of patients with PETNET score of P1/P2 (no or low FDG uptake) vs those with P3-P5 (moderate or high FDG uptake).
Time frame: 2 years
Impact of the addition of FDG PET to patient management as assessed by rate of clinical management changed after the addition of 18F-FDG PET/CT to 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT.
Time frame: 2 years
Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by measuring the proportion of patients with variable PET NET score at different tumor sites (intraindividual variability).
Time frame: 2 years
To determine whether tumor texture features on PET correlate with tumor grade and/or Ki-67 index.
Time frame: 2 years
To determine whether tumor texture features on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET correlate with glucose metabolism (as measured semiquantitatively with SUV on FDG PET); and/or whether tumor texture features on FDG PET correlate with somatostatin receptor expression (as measured semiquantitatively with SUV on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET).
University Health Network, Toronto
Other
Combined 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients With Well-differentiated, G2-G3, Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP)-Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs) - A Pilot Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06448208
Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Histologic Type
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06204159
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03935893
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoma
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02568267
Adenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Papillary
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details