Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Charité Mitte
Berlin, Deutschland, 10115, Germany
NCT Number: NCT03383770
Regional anaesthesia is a frequently used procedure. Currently, blockades are increasingly carried out without nerve stimulation. The risk of nerve lesion is about 3 %. Industrial efforts frequently referred to ultrasound optimisation of the regional anaesthesia cannula. In order to optimise patient safety, the benefit of both procedures (stimulation and ultrasound) should be combined and both procedures optimised. In this study, the influence of the needle electrode size on the stimulability of the nerve ischiadicus should be determined.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Berlin, Deutschland, 10115, Germany
There are various methods of performing regional anesthesia. In recent years, the focus has been on ultrasound-supported regional anaesthesia, and the stimulation methods that were often used in the past were no longer used or used less frequently. The combination of both methods may be an additional safety aspect and can contribute to an improved blocking quality. In addition to the best possible ultrasound quality, an optimal stimulation quality is also required. The investigators plan to carry out dual-guidance blockages of the ischiadic nerve with various regional anaesthesia needles (manufacturer of the used needles: Pajunk Medical Produkte GmbH, Geisingen, Germany; Teleflex Medical GmbH, Kernen, Germany). All regional anaesthesia cannulae are approved for the planned blockades of humans in Germany.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The patients receive the planned anaesthesia procedure according to the procedure to be performed. Only nerve blockages are carried out, which are considered to be analgesic useful for the planned operations on the basis of typical nerve courses. A touhy cannula is used.
The patients receive the planned anaesthesia procedure according to the procedure to be performed. Only nerve blockages are carried out, which are considered to be analgesic useful for the planned operations on the basis of typical nerve courses. A facet cannula is used.
Time frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Ultrasound-based measurement of needle-nerve distance during the application of the regional anesthesia of the N. ischiadicus during infragluteal access.
Time frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Ultrasound visibility of needle
Time frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Ultrasound visibility of nerve
Time frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Impedance measured by nerve stimulator while progressing the needle
Time frame: duration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutes
Effectiveness of the motor blockade measured by possible movement of the foot
Time frame: duration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutes
Effectiveness of the blockade measured by temperature sensibility testing on the food
Time frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Changes in impedance measurement while blockade
Time frame: duration of surgery and recovery unit, an average of 120 minutes
Occurence of complications of regional anesthesia
Time frame: duration of blockade, an average of 15 minutes
Number of Needle-Nerve-Contacts by Ultrasound-measurement
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Other
Dual Guidance in Regional Anesthesia - Prospective Randomized Study of Needle-nerve Distance in Different Cannulas for Regional Nerve Blockade
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04669145
Anesthesia, Anesthesia, Local
Jefferson, Louisiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05868642
Anesthesia, Local, Anesthesia; Adverse Effect
Bologna, BO, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05483647
Acute Pain, Anesthesia
Rivne, Rivne Oblast, Ukraine
View Trial DetailsNCT04498923
Agnosia, Anesthesia
Rivne, Rivne Oblast, Ukraine
View Trial Details