Campus Científico-Tecnológico UAH. Av. de León, 3A
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28805, Spain
NCT Number: NCT06505161
The aim of this study is to evaluate the reduction of pain of two different treatments in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients were divided in two groups. The control group will receive DN treatment, and the experimental group will receive PE, both in the lumbar multifidus muscles.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified30 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, 28805, Spain
Background: Low back pain is one of the most common health problems and a leading cause of disability and absence from work. Between 70% and 80% of adults will experience an episode of low back pain and approximately 10.0% of them will become chronic. This has a direct impact on the lumbar stabilizing muscles, giving rise to both structural and functional changes. Among the different treatment options, it has been observed that both dry needling (DN) and percutaneous electrolysis (PE) are effective techniques in the management of musculoskeletal pain.
Aim: To evaluate whether the reduction of pain after the application of PE is superior to the one obtained with DN.
Methods: A single-blind randomized clinical trial will be conducted in patients with chronic low back pain. The subjects will be divided into two groups. The control group will receive DN treatment, and the experimental group will receive PE, both in the lumbar multifidus muscles. The study variables will be: pain (VAS), disability index (Oswestry Scale), fear of movement (TSK-11SV) and quality of life (SF-12). The measurements will be assessed before, right after and 7 days after a single intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
It consists in application of dry needling on active and/or latent TPs in low back multifidus muscles
It consists in the application of intratissue percutaneous electrolysis with galvanic current as a cathodic flow electrode in the low back multifidus muscles. The intervention will be guided by ultrasound equipment medically certified.
Time frame: At baseline, at 1 week after the last intervention, and 6-month follow-up period
A 10-point Numerical Pain Scale (0: no pain, 10: maximum pain) assesses the intensity of pain
Time frame: At baseline, at 1 week after the last intervention, and 6-month follow-up period
It has 10 items associated to activities of daily living, each item has a punctuation from 0 to 5 points
Time frame: At baseline, at 1 week after the last intervention, and 6-month follow-up period
Is a 11-item questionnaire that measures the fear of movement and (re)injury.
Time frame: At baseline, at 1 week after the last intervention, and 6-month follow-up period
SF-12 Health questionnaire scores range from 0 to 100% and indicate the self-perceived health-related quality of life
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Leire Lopez de Calle Sánchez, Grade
CONTACT
Samuel Fernandez Carnero, PhD
CONTACT
University of Alcala
Other
Dry Needling Versus Percutaneous Electrolysis in Lumbar Multifidus Muscles in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
Acronym: DN-PE-LBP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07731750
Chronic Low-back Pain
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07462832
Chronic Low-back Pain
View Trial DetailsNCT06778694
Chronic Low-back Pain
View Trial DetailsNCT06544850
Chronic Low-back Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
View Trial Details