Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05186532

Dry Heat Versus Sitz Bath On Episiotomy Wound Heating And Pelvic Pain

Objective: To compare the effect of dry heat versus moist heat application on episiotomy wound healing and pain among postnatal mothers.

Research hypothesis H0: Postnatal mothers who apply dry heat on their episiotomy wound experience the same wound healing and pain as those who apply moist heat.

H1: Postnatal mothers who apply dry heat on their episiotomy wound experience faster wound healing and less pain than those who apply moist heat.

H2: Postnatal mothers who apply moist heat on their episiotomy wound experience faster wound healing and less pain than those who apply dry heat.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Faculty of Nursing

Alexandria, 56321, Egypt

About this study

A quasi-experimental study was carried out at Abu EL-Matamer Central Hospital and Housh Issa Central Hospital. A sample of 100 postnatal women were randomly assigned into two equal groups. Women in the control group received the moist heat, which entails; sitting in a warm water tub up to the hip level. While, the study group were subjected to infra red-light therapy that supplies radiant heat or infra-red rays to produce heat to the episiotomy wound.

Women who fulfilled the criteria from the postnatal inpatient ward at Abu EL-Matamer Central Hospital and Housh Issa Central Hospital in El-Beheira Governorate. Each woman was randomly assigned to one of the (dry heat or moist heat) groups. The researchers explained the aim of the study to every woman, and then her consent to participate in the study was obtained.

All study subjects were individually interviewed by the researchers on the first two hours after delivery during hospital stay to collect the basic data, episiotomy pain intensity was assessed by, as well as the researchers inspect the episiotomy site for Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge and Approximation of the wound edges using REEDA scale within 2 hours after episiotomy repair to evaluate wound healing (Pretest).

After the assessment the researchers provided clear and concise information through illustrative pamphlet for the both groups.

Dry heat group included 50 postnatal women they were encouraged to place an infrared lamp at distance of 45 cm from the perineum and the heat produced with 230 volts for ten minutes. But the mother is checked after the first five minutes to make sure that she was not being burned. The researchers were demonstrated for each woman how to use infrared lamp, and it was followed by re demonstrations and discussions. After 12 hours of episiotomy this procedure was carried out in the morning and evening for ten consecutive days. The researcher gives the infrared lamp device for each woman then restore it after completion of the study.

Moist heat group included 50 postnatal women they were encouraged to sit in a basin (tub) of warm water (45 o C -59 o C) without pressure on the perineum and with the feet flat on the floor for 10 minutes. The researchers were demonstrated for each woman how to do warm sitz bath, and it was followed by re demonstrations and discussions. After 12 hours of episiotomy this procedure was carried out in the morning and evening for ten consecutive days.

At the end of the session the researchers gave each woman health education about the importance of follow-up to ensure woman compliance for the interventions they assigned to it and to assess wound healing. The researchers motivated the women to perform the interventions they assigned to it through daily telephone calls by reminding the women with its benefits and importance of follow up.

Follow up: Women of the two groups were instructed to come to the obstetric outpatient clinic at Abu EL-Matamer Central Hospital and Housh Issa Central Hospital for follow up visits during the morning shift on the 5th and 10th day post-partum, the perineal area was observed for redness, edema, ecchymosis, discharge and approximation of the skin as well as perineal pain. During each follow up visit the researchers had evaluated the episiotomy pain intensity using and episiotomy wound healing.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Primipara
  • First 2 hours after delivery
  • Have a normal vaginal delivery
  • Have episiotomy
  • complaining of perineal discomfort (pain)
  • Having a telephone for contact

Exclusion criteria

  • The women who were
  • use any pain-relieving drug
  • labor complications
  • postpartum complications
  • diabetes
  • anemia
  • Illiterate

Treatment and study plan

Dry Heat Application

Radiation

50 postnatal women they were encouraged to place an infrared lamp at distance of 45 cm from the perineum and the heat produced with 230 volts for ten minutes. But the mother is checked after the first five minutes to make sure that she was not being burned. The researchers were demonstrated for each woman how to use infrared lamp, and it was followed by re demonstrations and discussions. After 12 hours of episiotomy this procedure was carried out in the morning and evening for ten consecutive days. The researcher gives the infrared lamp device for each woman then restore it after completion of the study.

Moist Heat Application

Other

included 50 postnatal women they were encouraged to sit in a basin (tub) of warm water (45 o C -59 o C) without pressure on the perineum and with the feet flat on the floor for 10 minutes. The researchers were demonstrated for each woman how to do warm sitz bath, and it was followed by re demonstrations and discussions. After 12 hours of episiotomy this procedure was carried out in the morning and evening for ten consecutive days.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pelvic pain

    Time frame: After 10 days

    The researchers measured the pelvic pain intensity using Visual analogue scale: This scale was adopted and translated to an Arabic version to be used in the current study. It was developed by Melzack and Katz (1994). It is a self-reported device consisting of a horizontal line used for subjective estimation of patient's pain. It comprises 10-point numerical scale, corresponding to the degree of pain with zero representing no pain and 10 representing the worst degree of pain. Scores 1, 2, 3 indicate mild pain, while 4, 5, 6 scores indicate moderate pain and 7, 8, 9 scores indicate severe pain; finally, 10 indicate the worst unbearable pain

  2. Episiotomy wound healing

    Time frame: After 10 days

    The researchers assessed episiotomy wound healing using The standardized Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation (REEDA) scale ; The REEDA scale is an observational check list used for assessing perineal wound healing that was primarily developed by Davidson (1974). It can be used to assess all types of postpartum perineal trauma. It has five components namely Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge and Approximation of the wound edges. Each component takes a score ranged from 0 to 3 . Total REEDA score ranges between 0 and 15. Higher score indicates poor wound healing while lower score indicates good wound healing. The total score of REEDA scale was categorized as follows; Completely healed from 0 to 2 , Moderately healed from 3 to 5 , Mildly healed from 6 to 8, and Not healed from 9 to 15

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Alexandria University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

To What Extent Does Application of Dry Heat is Effective in Promoting Episiotomy Wound Healing and Reducing Pelvic Pain Among Primipara Women?

Acronym: Dry_Heat

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jan 11, 2022
Registry last updated
Jan 11, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.