Patras University Hospital, Department of Radiology, Angiography Suite
Rio, Achaias, 26504, Greece
NCT Number: NCT01174472
The aim of the study is to compare the feasibility and the effectiveness, by means of immediate and long-term results, of drug eluting balloon (DEB) versus conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of failing dialysis access.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Rio, Achaias, 26504, Greece
In total 40 patients already diagnosed with hemodynamically significant stenosis of the dialysis AVF or AVG (including venous outflow lesions), programmed to undergo percutaneous transluminal angioplasty by our department, will sign informed consent and will be randomized to either receive DEB (Paclitaxel eluting balloon), or conventional balloon therapy. The protocol includes the description of patient's demographics (age, gender,dialysis access details, risk factors) and procedural details, as well as immediate results and long-term follow up.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Angioplasty performed with the use of the novel paclitaxel eluting balloons
Other names: IN.PACT ADMIRAL, Paclitaxel eluting dilatation PTA catheter
Time frame: 1 minute after the final balloon angioplasty
Residual stenosis of the treated lesion less than 30%, without any hemodynamicaly significant dissection (Type C)after the final angiography
Time frame: 1 year
Angiographic visualization of a lesion with <50% restenosis and no need for any additional repeat interventional procedure within the previously treated lesion, due to failing access.
Time frame: 1 year
Angiographicaly proven patency (<50% restenosis and no need for any additional repeat interventional procedure within the previously treated lesion, due to failing access)of the treated lesion following one re-intervention procedure of any kind.
Time frame: 1 year
The time interval without any additional recanalization procedure within the area of the treated lesion, because of angiographic or/and clinical deterioration
Time frame: Periprocedural and up to 1 year
Classified according to published international guidelines and reporting standards
Time frame: Periprocedural and up to 1 year follow-up
Classified according to published international guidelines and reporting standards
University of Patras
Other
Drug Eluting Versus Conventional Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Failing Dialysis Access. A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Trial.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03388892
Angioplasty, Chronic Disease
Hsinchu, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT03418181
Dialysis, Female Urogenital Diseases
Stevenage, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07662564
Dialysis, Neurologic Manifestations
Fatih, İ̇stanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04466865
Behavior, Chronic Disease
Denver, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details