Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04814212

Drug-Coated Balloon in Anticoagulated and Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing PCI

The purpose of this study is to compare DCB with DES in stable CAD or ACS patients who are at high risk of bleeding. The hypothesis of the DEBATE trial is that the strategy using DCB and a shorter DAPT regimen is non-inferior to the treatment using DES and longer DAPT duration on patients with high bleeding risk. If non-inferiority is shown, the superiority of the DCB strategy over DES strategy will be tested.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Central Hospital of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Central Finland, Finland

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES) has become a standard of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the last two decades. However there are still significant drawbacks in using DES as a permanent coronary implant. Most importantly, bleeding remains a significant complication of PCI, especially in elderly patients. The number of PCI patients having OAC:s is already significant, and will grow in the future, as the volume of PCIs in octogenarians increases, and so does the incidence of atrial fibrillation by age. After stenting at least one month lasting dual antiplatlet treatment (DAPT) is mandatory, and it cannot be safely terminated in case of a bleed. The optimal duration of DAPT on patients at bleeding risk is not known.

Balloon coated with paclitaxel and iopromide (drug-coated balloon, DCB) was originally developed for the treatment of in-stent restenosis, but later its potential for the treatment of de-novo coronary artery leasons has become clear in large registry trials. So far, the randomized controlled studies have shown the non-inferiority of PCI using DCB in comparison to DES in de novo leasons in small vessels. Also the non-inferiority of PCI using DCB in comparison to BMS was shown in the DEBUT trial in large vessels on patients at high bleeding risk. These results need to be confirmed in comparison of DCB to DES as the use of BMS is diminishing.

The hypothesis of the DEBATE trial is that the strategy using DCB and a shorter DAPT regimen is non-inferior to the treatment using DES and longer DAPT duration in the treatment of stable CAD or in ACS (UAP or NSTEMI) in patients on anticoagulation medication or otherwise on high bleeding risk. If non-inferiority is shown, the superiority of the DCB strategy over DES strategy will be tested.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Informed written consent
  • At least one major or two minor bleeding risk criteria of Academic Research Consortium (ARC)

Major Criteria

  • Long-term oral anticoagulation
  • Severe or end stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular - filtration rate [eGFR] <30 ml/min)
  • Hemoglobin <110 g/l
  • Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization and transfusion in the past 6 months
  • Moderate to severe baseline thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 x 10e9/L)
  • Chronic bleeding diathesis
  • Liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension
  • Active cancer in the past 12 months
  • Previous spontaneous ICH (at any time)
  • Previous traumatic ICH within the past 12 months
  • Presence of known brain arteriovenous malformation
  • Moderate to severe ischemic stroke within the past 6 months
  • Nondeferrable major surgery on dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Recent major surgery or trauma within 30 days before PCI

Minor Criteria

  • Age >75 years
  • Moderate CKD (eGFR 30-59 ml/min)
  • Hemoglobin 110-129 g/l for men and 110-119 g/l for women
  • Spontaneous bleeding requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 12 - months not meeting major criterion
  • Long term use of oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or steroids
  • Any ischemic stroke at any time not meeting major criterion

Either of the following:

  • Stabile angina or dyspnea and a coronary narrowing causing myocardial ischemia detected in the angiogram. In stable patients prior PCI, the evidence of ischemia is needed acquired either by perfusion imaging or by pressure wire measurement (FFR) during coronary angiography unless the coronary stenosis is > 90% in diameter.
  • ACS (UAP or NSTEMI): symptoms of heart ischemia≥ 20 minutes and ≥ 0,5mm ST-depression or transient ST-elevation or T-wave inversion at least in two adjacent leads and/or a high sensitivity troponin (hs-tnt) rise at least one unit above the 99. percentil or at least 50% rise in hs-tnt between two samples taken 1-3 hours apart.

At least one of the following:

  • ≥1 de novo lesions in native coronary arteries or bypass vein grafts
  • Reference diameter of the vessel is 2.0-5.0mm'
  • Lesion length ≤ 40mm
  • Lesion or lesions are suitable for PCI

Exclusion criteria

  • Inability to give written consent
  • STEMI
  • Reference diameter of the vessel is <2.0mm or >5.0 mm
  • Bifurcation lesion requiring the stenting of either of the branches after predilatation (TIMI<3 or significant recoil >30% in the main epicardial vessel: LAD, LCX or RCA) after predilatation)
  • Dissection affecting the flow (TIMI<3) or significant recoil (>30% in the main epicardial vessel: LAD, LCX or RCA) after predilatation
  • in-stent restenosis
  • Chronic total occlusion
  • Life expectancy < 12 months
  • Cardiogenic shock at the arrival to the coronary angiography
  • Uncertainty about neurological recovery e.g. after resuscitation
  • Need for bypass surgery by heart team decision

Treatment and study plan

Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon

Device

SeQuent Please (BBraun) + tailored antithrombotic regimen:

  • Stable patients without OAC: perioperative SAPT (preferably) or perioperative DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
  • Stable patients with OAC: perioperative SAPT (preferably) or perioperative DAPT and lifelong OAC
  • ACS patients without OAC: 1-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
  • ACS patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 1-month SAPT and lifelong OAC

Other names: DCB

Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent

Device

Biofreedom (Biosensors), Synergy (Boston Scientific), Ultimaster Tansei (Terumo) and Integrity Onyx (Medtronic), Xience Pro S (Abbott) or Promus Elite (Boston Scientific) or any other DES can also be used provided that it has a CE mark for 1-month DAPT, combined with tailored antithrombotic regimen:

  • Stable patients without OAC: 1-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
  • Stable patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 6 months SAPT (ADP receptor blocker) and life-long OAC
  • ACS patients without OAC: 3-month DAPT followed by lifelong SAPT
  • ACS patients with OAC: perioperative DAPT followed by 6 months SAPT (ADP receptor blocker) and lifelong OAC

Other names: DES

Primary outcomes

  1. The composite of MACE and BARC type 2-5 bleeding episodes

    Time frame: 12 months

    Major Adverse Cardiac Event = a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemia driven-target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). BARC = Bleeding academic research consortium. In stable patients, the evidence of ischemia is acquired either by non-invasive testing (for example stress ECG or perfusion imaging) or by pressure wire measurement (FFR) during coronary angiography.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The composite of MACE and BARC2-5 bleedings

    Time frame: 24 and 36 months

    Major Adverse Cardiac Event = a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemia driven-target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). BARC = Bleeding academic research consortium. In stable patients, the evidence of ischemia is acquired either by non-invasive testing (for example stress ECG or perfusion imaging) or by pressure wire measurement (FFR) during coronary angiography.

  2. MACE

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemia driven-target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR)

  3. BARC2-5 bleedings

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    BARC = Bleeding academic research consortium

  4. BARC3-5 bleedings

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    BARC = Bleeding academic research consortium

  5. Total mortality

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    All-cause mortality

  6. Cardiovascular mortality

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Cardiovascular death is defined as death resulting from cardiovascular causes. The following categories may be collected:

    • Death caused by acute MI
    • Death caused by sudden cardiac, including unwitnessed, death
    • Death resulting from heart failure
    • Death caused by stroke
    • Death caused by cardiovascular procedures
    • Death resulting from cardiovascular hemorrhage
    • Death resulting from other cardiovascular cause
  7. TVF

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Target-vessel failure

  8. TLR

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Target-lesion revascularization

  9. TLF

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Target-lesion failure

  10. Myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document will be used (Circulation. 2018;137:2635-2650)

  11. The composite of TVF (Target-vessel failure) and BARC2-5 bleedings

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Target-vessel failure. BARC = Bleeding academic research consortium.

  12. The composite of TLF (Target-lesion failure) and BARC2-5 bleedings

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Target-lesion failure. BARC = Bleeding academic research consortium.

  13. The composite of TLR (Target-lesion revascularization) and BARC2-5 bleedings

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Target-lesion revascularization. BARC = Bleeding academic research consortium.

  14. The composite of TLR (Target-lesion revascularization) and BARC3-5 bleedings

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Target-lesion revascularization. BARC = Bleeding academic research consortium.

  15. Acute vessel closure as defined by the international consensus criteria for definite/probable stent thrombosis

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document will be used (Circulation. 2018;137:2635-2650)

  16. Hospitalization for urgent revascularization

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document will be used (Circulation. 2018;137:2635-2650)

  17. Stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or TIA

    Time frame: 12, 24 and 36 months

    Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document will be used (Circulation. 2018;137:2635-2650)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Alma Räsänen, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Tuomas Rissanen, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+358505998022

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

North Karelia Central Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Central Finland Hospital District
  • Central Hospital of Lapland
  • Centre Hospitalier de La Rochelle
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Hospital Universitario de Cabuenes
  • Kuopio University Hospital
  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Oulu University Hospital
  • Päijät Häme Central Hospital
  • Satakunta Central Hospital
  • Tampere University Hospital
  • Turku University Hospital
  • University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus
  • University Hospital, Saarland

Registry information

Acronym: DEBATE

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2028
First posted
Mar 24, 2021
Registry last updated
Nov 9, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.