Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07419360

DRAIN: DRainage in Acute Decompensated Heart faIlure With Pleural effusioNs

The goal of this study is to assess if removal of fluid around the lungs (pleural effusion) by a routine procedure called as thoracentesis is helpful to decrease shortness of breath in hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure and have pleural effusion.

Researchers will compare thoracentesis with medical therapy to medical therapy alone to see if one treatment is superior to the other treatment in relieving shortness of breath.

Participants will :

1. Receive medical therapy with or without thoracentesis 2. Record degree of shortness of breath and quality of life before and after the intervention using predefined standard scales. 3. Telephonic call for 15- 30 mins at day 14 and 30 after enrollment to assess shortness of breath and quality of life

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Albany Medical Center

Albany, New York, 12211, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

About this study

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is the most common cause of pleural effusions.The presence of clinically significant pleural effusions in hospitalized patients with CHF has been associated with increased hospital length of stay and mortality.The treatment of CHF-related pleural effusion (CHF-PE) typically involves heart failure management such as diuresis. The role of therapeutic thoracentesis in managing heart failure-related effusions is not well established. There is only one randomized controlled trial that assessed the effect of therapeutic thoracentesis in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤45%) and a sizable pleural effusion. This study showed that upfront large volume thoracentesis in addition to medical therapy did not result in improved outcomes, including median days alive out of the hospital over 90 days, hospital length of stay, mortality, or quality of life. However, this trial excluded patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Few studies show that HFpEF is a more common and prevalent cause of heart failure-related pleural effusion as compared to those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators will compare the clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure and pleural effusion who receive therapeutic thoracentesis in addition to medical therapy as compared to the no thoracentesis group.

Primary objective of this study is to assess the effect of upfront therapeutic thoracentesis in addition to the medical therapy in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure and moderate to large effusion on degree of dyspnea relief as measured by VAS score

Secondary objectives are to examine the effect of thoracentesis on secondary outcomes such as index hospital length of stay, 90-day hospital free survival, quality of life, hospital readmission rate at 90 days and complications related to thoracentesis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients age >18 years and.
  • Clinical diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure with at least one clinical sign of volume overload (e.g., peripheral edema, pleural effusion, or ascites) and
  • Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiography performed during the time of index hospitalization or within 3 months prior to enrollment and
  • Serum NT-proBNP level of >1000 pg/ml or Serum BNP>250 pg/ml at the time of enrollment and
  • Radiographic evidence of moderate to large pleural effusion, defined as pleural fluid occupying more than 1/3rd of the hemithorax on chest X-ray.

Exclusion criteria

  • Clinical indication for diagnostic thoracentesis - Presence of fever, clinical signs of infection, or atypical pleural effusion for CHF (unilateral left-sided effusion, findings suggestive of malignancy, infection, or alternative etiologies) or.
  • Loculated pleural effusion - Evidence of loculated pleural effusion on thoracic ultrasound, as defined as the presence of septations or complex homogenous echogenic fluid (see Imaging Assessment section) or.
  • Clinical indication for therapeutic thoracentesis - Presence of massive pleural effusion with acute respiratory failure requiring positive pressure ventilation, high-flow oxygen therapy (>15 liters per minute of flow), or tension hydrothorax (massive effusion with mediastinal shift and hemodynamic compromise) or.
  • Contraindication to thoracentesis, uncontrolled bleeding diathesis, or irreversible INR > 2.0 and platelet count <50,000 or.
  • Patient with mechanical mitral valve, where anticoagulation cannot be safely held or.
  • Pleural procedure, such as but not limited to thoracentesis, chest tube placement, or thoracoscopy, within 3 months prior to enrollment or.
  • Cardiac or thoracic surgery within 3 months prior to enrollment or.
  • Requirement for chronic renal replacement therapy, such as hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis or.
  • Pregnancy or
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent, or current incarceration (prisoners).

Treatment and study plan

Thoracentesis

Procedure

pleural fluid will be removed

Primary outcomes

  1. Dyspnea

    Time frame: 30 days

    Degree of dyspnea will be assessed as by using a validated 100 mm visual analog scale in participants of both groups. Dyspnea will be assessed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS consisted of a horizontal straight line with endpoints defining extreme limits, with the left end marked as "no trouble" (0 mm) and the right end as "very much trouble" (100 mm). A higher VAS score indicated more severe dyspnea. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as ≥ 14 mm improvement on this 100 mm scale, adapted from the established 24-hour VAS dyspnea threshold for clinical practicality in our setting.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients achieved clinically significant decrease in mean VAS dyspnea score

    Time frame: 30 days

    Proportion of patients achieved clinically significant decrease in mean VAS dyspnea score over the first 30 days after the enrollment

  2. Bendopnea

    Time frame: 5 days

    Patient will be instructed to bend forward at the waist and aim to touch ankles and maintain this position for 60 seconds. Patient will inform the investigator as soon as the dyspnea occurs, and the time of onset of bendopnoea and degree of dyspnea will be recorded.

  3. Quality of life- KCCQ12

    Time frame: 30 days

    The investigators will use Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) to assess quality of life. This is based on 12 questions. Score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher score means better health.

  4. Hospital free day at day 90

    Time frame: 90 days

    Number of hospital-free days at day 90 post-randomization, defined as the total number of days alive and not hospitalized from the date of randomization to 90 days

  5. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: 90 days

    All cause mortality

  6. Adverse events

    Time frame: upto 30 days

    Complications related to thoracentesis (Hemothorax, pneumothorax, need for additional pleural procedures) or medical therapy.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Amit Chopra, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

646-266-9476

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Albany Medical College

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Role of Therapeutic Thoracentesis in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: DRAIN-IT

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Feb 19, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.