doxepin hydrochloride oral solution
Drug2.5 mL (25 mg) doxepin and 2.5 mL water administered orally
NCT Number: NCT02229539
The purpose of this study is to test whether a mouthwash made with a drug called doxepin can reduce the pain caused by mouth sores resulting from radiation therapy. A number of mouth rinse preparations exist for patients with treatment-related oral mucositis pain such as the DLA rinse, an over-the-counter medication. This study will evaluate the effects of doxepin compared to DLA (diphenhydramine, lidocaine and antacids) and placebo.Doxepin is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of depression, anxiety, long-term pain management, as well as management of rash.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Alaska Breast Care and Surgery LLC, Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Patients are stratified according to sex (male vs. female), concurrent use of chemotherapy (no vs. yes), patient age at registration (< 60 years old vs. ≥ 60 years old and RTOG acute radiation morbidity criteria (1 vs. 2 vs 3 or more). Protocol therapy will consist of 2 cycles. Patients are randomized to one of three treatment regimens, which include doxepin, DLA and placebo. Cycle One will consist of one day. The care provider or nurse will confirm that the oral pain is at least 4 out of 10 severity level at the time of the rinse on the first day of the study. Patient will be asked to complete the baseline evaluation in the Oral Symptoms booklet. If the pain score is less than 4 then administration will be delayed until the pain is at least 4. Cycle Two will consist of an optional continuation phase lasting up to 7 days. Initiation of the Cycle 2/Continuation Phase may be delayed up to one week after Cycle 1/Day 1.
Primary Objective:
Secondary Objectives:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Note: The pain score must be at least 4 at the time that the patient starts the first dose of study medication. The patient may be enrolled to the study if s/he, at times, has a pain score of at least 4, so long as initiation of study treatment begins when the pain score is at least 4.
2.5 mL (25 mg) doxepin and 2.5 mL water administered orally
5.0 mL administered orally
2.5 mL placebo and 2.5 mL water administered orally
Time frame: Baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes post treatment
Total pain reduction (mouth and throat) was measured by the numerical analogue scale of mouth pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no pain and 10=worst pain in the questionnaires taken at baseline, and 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after assigned treatment for doxepin or DLA vs. placebo. The total pain reduction was calculated by the (average of mouth and throat) area under the curve (AUC) adjusting for baseline, with time scale (baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post treatment) replaced by a numerical scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 respectively. The AUC was prorated when there are terminal missing data. If the missing data were intermittent, simple imputation by trapezoidal rules were applied to calculate the AUC. If a patient cancelled, was missing baseline data, or only provided baseline data, he/she was excluded from the statistical analysis.
Time frame: 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes post treatment
Total unpleasant taste was measured by the numerical analogue scale of taste of the oral rinse on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=acceptable and 10=terrible in the questionnaires taken at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after assigned treatment for doxepin or DLA vs. placebo. The total unpleasant taste was calculated by the area under the curve (AUC) adjusting for 5 minutes post treatment, with time scale (5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post treatment) replaced by a numerical scale of 1, 2, 3, 4 5 and 6 respectively. The AUC was prorated when there are terminal missing data. If the missing data were intermittent, simple imputation by trapezoidal rules were applied to calculate the AUC. If a patient cancelled, was missing 5 minutes after treatment data, or only provided 5 minutes after treatment data, he/she was excluded from the statistical analysis.
Time frame: 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes post treatment
Total stinging or burning was measured by the numerical analogue scale of stinging or burning from the oral rinse on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no stinging or burning and 10=worst stinging or burning possible in the questionnaires taken at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after assigned treatment for doxepin or DLA vs. placebo. The total stinging or burning was calculated by the area under the curve (AUC) adjusting for 5 minutes post treatment, with time scale (5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post treatment) replaced by a numerical scale of 1, 2, 3, 4 5 and 6 respectively. The AUC was prorated when there are terminal missing data. If the missing data were intermittent, simple imputation by trapezoidal rules were applied to calculate the AUC. If a patient cancelled, was missing 5 minutes after treatment data, or only provided 5 minutes after treatment data, he/she was excluded from the statistical analysis.
Time frame: Baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes post treatment
Total drowsiness was measured by the numerical analogue scale of drowsiness on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no drowsiness and 10=extreme drowsiness, leading to sleep in the questionnaires taken at baseline, and 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 minutes after assigned treatment for doxepin or DLA vs. placebo. The total drowsiness was calculated by the area under the curve (AUC) adjusting for baseline, with time scale (baseline, 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 minutes post treatment) replaced by a numerical scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 respectively. The AUC was prorated when there are terminal missing data. If the missing data were intermittent, simple imputation by trapezoidal rules were applied to calculate the AUC. If a patient cancelled, was missing baseline data, or only provided baseline data, he/she was excluded from the statistical analysis.
Time frame: At 120 and 240 minutes post treatment
Patients were asked if they have taken any other pain medications, if yes, to record the name, strength and when they have taken the pain medications in the 120 minutes and 240 minutes post treatment questionnaires.
Time frame: At 240 minutes post treatment
Patients were asked: "Based on your experience with this current oral rinsing medication, would you want to take another dose now if it were available?" in the 240 minutes post treatment questionnaire.
Time frame: Up to 7 days.
Patients were asked: "Did you use the study rinse today?" daily questionnaire during the optional continuation phase (Cycle 2).
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 7 in the Continuation Phase
Mouth pain scores was measured using the numerical analogue scale ranging from scale of 0 to 10, with 0=no pain and 10=worst pain daily during the optional continuation phase (Cycle 2).
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 7 in the Continuation Phase
Patients were asked if they have taken any medications for pain over the past 24 hours, if yes, to record the name, strength and when they have taken the pain medications daily during the optional continuation phase (Cycle 2).
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
Other
A Phase III Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Three-Arm Study of Doxepin and a Topical Rinse in the Treatment of Acute Oral Mucositis Pain in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.