TIP
DrugTIP dose regimen
NCT Number: NCT02712983
The purpose of this study was to support the selection of a safe and tolerable tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) dose, and regimen that exhibits effective bacterial reduction of P. aeruginosa in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (BE) patients with P. aeruginosa colonization.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Novartis Investigative Site, Brussels, Belgium
This was a blinded, randomized, dose and regimen finding trial utilizing a three treatment cohort design where active TIP and TIP/Placebo cyclical (3 capsules o.d [Cohort A], 5 capsules o.d. [Cohort B] or 4 capsules b.i.d. [Cohort C]) versus Placebo were administered for a total of 112 days.
Novartis decided to close the recruitment of new subjects into this study earlier than scheduled. Subjects who had a signed informed consent form and entered screening by 10-Sep-2018 still participated in the study. The latest possible randomization was on 08-Oct-2018. All subjects enrolled in the study (107 enrolled subjects out of 180 planned) continued as planned through to their last scheduled visit. The early recruitment halt of the study was not due to safety or lack of efficacy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
TIP dose regimen
TIP and inhaled placebo dose regimen
Inhaled placebo dose regimen
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1), Visit 102 (Day 8), Visit 103 (Day 29)
Microbiological data was collected to understand the direct impact of the drug on the pathogens. Sputum samples were cultured for the presence of three Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) biotypes measured were mucoid, dry and small colony variant. Change was determined using the formula = (Post-baseline value - baseline value). If no P. aeruginosa was isolated for a visit, log10 colony forming units (CFU) was imputed with log10 (19) for all biotypes. Only values for all morphotypes presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1), Visit 104 (Day 57), Visit 105 (Day 85), Visit 106 (Day 113), End of Treatment (EOT), Visit 201 (Day 141), Visit 202 (Day 169)
Microbiological data was collected to understand the direct impact of the drug on the pathogens. Sputum samples were cultured for the presence of three Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) biotypes measured were mucoid, dry and small colony variant. Change was determined using the formula = (Post-baseline value - baseline value). If no P. aeruginosa was isolated for a visit, log10 colony forming units (CFU) was imputed with log10 (19) for all biotypes. Only values for all morphotypes are presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
The time to first onset of pulmonary exacerbation compared to placebo was analyzed. Participants with pulmonary exacerbation were categorized as: a) Overall, b) Category 1 (Oral): treated with oral antibiotics only and c) Category 2 (Parenteral): treated with parenteral Antibiotics and/or requiring hospitalization. Participants were censored at the time of completion of study or early discontinuation if they did not have a pulmonary exacerbation during the study period.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
The duration of pulmonary exacerbation compared to placebo was analyzed. Participants with pulmonary exacerbation were categorized as: a) Overall, b) Category 1 (Oral): treated with oral antibiotics only and c) Category 2 (Parenteral): treated with parenteral Antibiotics and/or requiring hospitalization.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
The exposure adjusted rate of pulmonary exacerbation compared to placebo was analyzed. Participants with pulmonary exacerbation were categorized as: a) Overall, b) Category 1 (Oral): treated with oral antibiotics only and c) Category 2 (Parenteral): treated with parenteral Antibiotics and/or requiring hospitalization. The Exposure adjusted rate = (Number of pulmonary exacerbations reported during the study period) / (sum of study duration in days for all participants/ 365.25). Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
Pulmonary exacerbations are defined as events requiring antibiotic therapy AND for which at least 3 of the following 6 symptoms, signs, or findings were present outside of normal variation: 1. Increased sputum volume, or change in viscosity/consistency or purulence for more than 24 hours; 2. Increased shortness of breath at rest or on exercise for more than 24 hours; 3. Increased cough for more than 24 hours; 4. Fever of ≥38° Celsius within the last 24 hours; 5. Increased malaise/fatigue/lethargy for more than 24 hours; 6. A reduction in forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1) or forced vital capacity (FVC) of least 10% from screening.
Participants were categorized as: a) Overall, b) Category 1: treated with oral antibiotics only and c) Category 2: treated with parenteral Antibiotics and/or requiring hospitalization.
Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
The percentage of participants who permanently discontinued study drug due to pulmonary exacerbation compared to placebo was analyzed.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
The time to permanent study drug discontinuation due to Pulmonary exacerbation. Participants were censored at the time of last contact if they did not permanently discontinue study drug due to pulmonary exacerbation requiring during the study period. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: From Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) up to approximately Day 173
The time to first use of anti-pseudomonal antibiotics administered compared to placebo was analyzed. Participants were censored at the time of last contact if they did not have anti-pseudomonal antibiotics over the entire study period.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
The percentage of participants requiring anti-pseudomonal antibiotics compared to placebo was analyzed. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
The total number of days of new anti-pseudomonal antibiotic use compared to placebo was analyzed. Only descriptive analysis
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
The percentage of participants requiring hospitalization due to serious respiratory-related adverse events (other than those regularly scheduled hospitalization that were planned prior to study start) was analyzed to define severity of pulmonary exacerbations compared to placebo. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
The duration of hospitalization due to serious respiratory-related adverse events (other than those regularly scheduled hospitalization that were planned prior to study start) was analyzed to define severity of pulmonary exacerbations compared to placebo. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
The number of hospitalization due to serious respiratory-related AEs was analyzed to define severity of pulmonary exacerbations compared to placebo. Respiratory related adverse events were identified using the AEs captured under system organ class 'Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders' and 'Infections and infestations'.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1) to Visit 202 (Day 169)
Time to first hospitalization due to serious respiratory-related AEs was analyzed to define severity of pulmonary exacerbations compared to placebo. Participants were censored at the time of last contact if they did not have a hospitalization due to serious respiratory-related adverse events over the entire study period.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1), Visit 102 (Day 8) and Visits 103 (Day 29): 0-1 hours and 1-2 hours post-dose.
The serum pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of tobramycin were assessed by evaluating tobramycin concentrations in serum collected from the non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis population post administration of o.d. or b.i.d. doses of TIP. Serum specimens for PK tobramycin concentration were assessed at Visit 101 (Day 1/start of treatment) 0 to 1 and 1 to 2 hours post-dose and Visit 102 (Day 8) 0 to 1 and 1 to 2 hours post-dose. Prior to protocol amendment #2, PK samples were assessed on Visits 103 (Day 29) rather than Visit 102. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 101/Day 1): 0-1 hours and 1-2 hours post-dose; Visit 102 (Day 8):0-2 hours and 5-6 hours post-dose; Visits 103 (Day 29): 5 to 6 hours post-dose, Visit 104 (Day 57) and Visit 105 (Day 85): 3-4 hours post-dose.
The sputum pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of tobramycin were assessed by evaluating tobramycin concentrations in sputum collected from the non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis population post administration of o.d. or b.i.d. doses of TIP. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 102 (Day 8), Visit 103 (Day 29), End of Treatment (Day 113) and Visit 202 (Day 169)
The QoL-B consists of 37 items across 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Functioning (RF), Vitality, Emotional Function (EF), Social Functioning (SF), Treatment Burden (TB), Health Perception (HP) and Respiratory Symptoms (RS). Each of the 37 items is scored from 1 to 4, and each of the 8 scale scores is standardized on a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms or better functioning and HRQoL. A total score is not calculated since functioning can vary greatly from one domain to another. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 102 (Day 8), Visit 103 (Day 29), End of Treatment (Day 113) and Visit 202 (Day 169)
The QoL-B consists of 37 items across 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Functioning (RF), Vitality, Emotional Function (EF), Social Functioning (SF), Treatment Burden (TB), Health Perception (HP) and Respiratory Symptoms (RS). Each of the 37 items is scored from 1 to 4, and each of the 8 scale scores is standardized on a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms or better functioning and HRQoL. A total score is not calculated since functioning can vary greatly from one domain to another. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 102 (Day 8), Visit 103 (Day 29), End of Treatment (Day 113) and Visit 202 (Day 169)
The QoL-B consists of 37 items across 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Functioning (RF), Vitality, Emotional Function (EF), Social Functioning (SF), Treatment Burden (TB), Health Perception (HP) and Respiratory Symptoms (RS). Each of the 37 items is scored from 1 to 4, and each of the 8 scale scores is standardized on a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms or better functioning and HRQoL. A total score is not calculated since functioning can vary greatly from one domain to another. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 102 (Day 8), Visit 103 (Day 29), End of Treatment (Day 113) and Visit 202 (Day 169)
The QoL-B consists of 37 items across 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Functioning (RF), Vitality, Emotional Function (EF), Social Functioning (SF), Treatment Burden (TB), Health Perception (HP) and Respiratory Symptoms (RS). Each of the 37 items is scored from 1 to 4, and each of the 8 scale scores is standardized on a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms or better functioning and HRQoL. A total score is not calculated since functioning can vary greatly from one domain to another. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 102 (Day 8), Visit 103 (Day 29), End of Treatment (Day 113) and Visit 202 (Day 169)
The QoL-B consists of 37 items across 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Functioning (RF), Vitality, Emotional Function (EF), Social Functioning (SF), Treatment Burden (TB), Health Perception (HP) and Respiratory Symptoms (RS). Each of the 37 items is scored from 1 to 4, and each of the 8 scale scores is standardized on a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms or better functioning and HRQoL. A total score is not calculated since functioning can vary greatly from one domain to another. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 102 (Day 8), Visit 103 (Day 29), End of Treatment (Day 113) and Visit 202 (Day 169)
The QoL-B consists of 37 items across 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Functioning (RF), Vitality, Emotional Function (EF), Social Functioning (SF), Treatment Burden (TB), Health Perception (HP) and Respiratory Symptoms (RS). Each of the 37 items is scored from 1 to 4, and each of the 8 scale scores is standardized on a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms or better functioning and HRQoL. A total score is not calculated since functioning can vary greatly from one domain to another. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 102 (Day 8), Visit 103 (Day 29), End of Treatment (Day 113) and Visit 202 (Day 169)
The QoL-B consists of 37 items across 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Functioning (RF), Vitality, Emotional Function (EF), Social Functioning (SF), Treatment Burden (TB), Health Perception (HP) and Respiratory Symptoms (RS). Each of the 37 items is scored from 1 to 4, and each of the 8 scale scores is standardized on a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms or better functioning and HRQoL. A total score is not calculated since functioning can vary greatly from one domain to another. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Time frame: Baseline, Visit 102 (Day 8), Visit 103 (Day 29), End of Treatment (Day 113) and Visit 202 (Day 169)
The QoL-B consists of 37 items across 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF), Role Functioning (RF), Vitality, Emotional Function (EF), Social Functioning (SF), Treatment Burden (TB), Health Perception (HP) and Respiratory Symptoms (RS). Each of the 37 items is scored from 1 to 4, and each of the 8 scale scores is standardized on a 0-100 point scale, with higher scores representing fewer symptoms or better functioning and HRQoL. A total score is not calculated since functioning can vary greatly from one domain to another. Only descriptive analysis performed.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A Randomized, Blinded, Parallel Group, Multi-center Dose-finding Study, to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Different Doses of Tobramycin Inhalation Powder in Patients With Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis and Pulmonary P. Aeruginosa Infection
Acronym: iBEST-1
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05495243
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchiectasis
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06237348
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchiectasis
Krakow, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT03218917
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchiectasis
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02088216
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchiectasis
Jinan, Shandong, China
View Trial Details