Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
NCT Number: NCT06203912
This phase I trial tests the side effects and best dose of TGFbi natural killer (NK) cells (TiNK) when given together with isatuximab for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma that has come back after a period of improvement (relapsed) or that has not responded to treatment (refractory). NK cells are a type of white blood cell that are known to spontaneously attack cancer cells. TiNK are NK cells made in a laboratory to have a higher response to tumor cells. A monoclonal antibody is a type of protein that can bind to certain targets in the body, such as molecules that cause the body to make an immune response (antigens). Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as isatuximab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Patients also receive standard treatment (cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone) on this trial. Cyclophosphamide is in a class of medications called alkylating agents. It works by damaging the cell's DNA and may kill cancer cells. It may also lower the body's immune response. Dexamethasone is in a class of medications called corticosteroids. It is used to reduce inflammation and lower the body's immune response to help lessen the side effects of chemotherapy drugs. Giving TiNK and isatuximab with standard treatment may be a safe and effective treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the safety and tolerability of transforming growth factor beta imprinted natural killer cells (TiNK) and isatuximab in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsed or refractory (R/R) to BCMA-targeting therapy.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria of TiNK and isatuximab in patients with MM R/R to BCMA-targeting therapy.
II. To determine the time to response (TTR), time to next therapy (TTNT), the duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) at 1 year.
III. To determine correlatives of outcomes. IV. To assess quality of life (QOL) with therapy.
OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of TiNK followed by a dose-expansion study.
Patients receive cyclophosphamide intravenously (IV) on day 1, dexamethasone orally (PO) on days 1-4, TiNK IV on day 8, and isatuximab IV on days 8 and 15 of each cycle. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy during screening and on study, as well as optionally during follow up. Patients undergo echocardiography (ECHO) during screening and blood sample collection throughout the study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days, 60 days. Patients who discontinue study treatment for reasons other than progressive disease follow up every 12 weeks for up to 2 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo blood sample collection
Other names: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy
Given IV
Other names: (-)-Cyclophosphamide, 2H-1,3,2-Oxazaphosphorine, 2-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]tetrahydro-, 2-oxide, monohydrate, Asta B 518, B-518, Carloxan, Ciclofosfamida, Ciclofosfamide, Cicloxal, Clafen, Claphene, CP monohydrate, CTX, CYCLO-cell, Cycloblastin, Cycloblastine, Cyclophospham, Cyclophosphamid monohydrate, Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate, Cyclophosphamidum, Cyclophosphan, Cyclophosphane, Cyclophosphanum, Cyclostin, Cyclostine, Cytophosphan, Cytophosphane, Cytoxan, Fosfaseron, Genoxal, Genuxal, Ledoxina, Mitoxan, Neosar, Revimmune, Syklofosfamid, WR- 138719, WR-138719
Given PO
Other names: Aacidexam, Adexone, Aknichthol Dexa, Alba-Dex, Alin, Alin Depot, Alin Oftalmico, Amplidermis, Anemul mono, Auricularum, Auxiloson, Baycadron, Baycuten, Baycuten N, Cortidexason, Cortisumman, Decacort, Decadrol, Decadron, Decadron DP, Decalix, Decameth, Decasone R.p., Dectancyl, Dekacort, Deltafluorene, Deronil, Desamethasone, Desameton, Dexa-Mamallet, Dexa-Rhinosan, Dexa-Scheroson, Dexa-sine, Dexacortal, Dexacortin, Dexafarma, Dexafluorene, Dexalocal, Dexamecortin, Dexameth, Dexamethasone Intensol, Dexamethasonum, Dexamonozon, Dexapos, Dexinoral, Dexone, Dinormon, Dxevo, Fluorodelta, Fortecortin, Gammacorten, Hemady, Hexadecadrol, Hexadrol, Lokalison-F, Loverine, Methylfluorprednisolone, Millicorten, Mymethasone, Orgadrone, Spersadex, TaperDex, Visumetazone, ZoDex
Undergo echocardiography
Other names: EC
Given IV
Other names: Hu 38SB19, Isatuximab-irfc, SAR 650984, SAR-650984, SAR650984, Sarclisa
Ancillary study
Given IV
Other names: Allogeneic TGFBi Expanded NK Cells, UD TGF-betai NK Cells, Universal Donor TGF-beta Imprinted Expanded NK Cells
Time frame: Up to 60 days after completion of study treatment
Will use the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version (v) 5.0 for AE collection. The maximum grade for each type of toxicity will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine toxicity patterns. The incidence of severe (grade 3+) adverse events or toxicities will be described. We will also assess tolerability of the regimen through assessing the number of patients who required dose modifications and/or dose delays. In addition, we will capture the proportion of patients who go off treatment due to adverse reactions.
Time frame: Up to 2 years after completion of study treatment
Will be defined as the total number of subjects whose best response is partial response (PR) or better divided by the number of patients. Will be reported overall with 95% binomial exact confidence intervals. Comparison of ORR among patient subgroups will be conducted using Fisher exact test.
Time frame: From start of treatment until measurement criteria are first met for PR, very good partial response (VGPR), or complete response (CR), assessed up to 2 years after completion of study treatment
Cumulative incidence rates will be calculated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks.
Time frame: From start of treatment until initiation of the next line of therapy, assessed up to 2 years after completion of study treatment
Cumulative incidence rates will be calculated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks.
Time frame: From the time measurement criteria are first met for PR or better (whichever status is recorded first) until the first date of progressive disease or death, assessed up to 2 years after completion of study
Will be computed for subjects whose best response is either PR, VGPR, or CR. Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From start of treatment until disease progression or death, at 1 year
Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From start of treatment to the date of his or her death, at 1 year
Will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline up to 60 days after completion of study treatment
Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global 10 Quality of Life Survey (PROMIS G10 QOL) A repeated measures linear mixed model will be fit to all QOL scores. The response options are presented as 5-point (and single 11-point for pain rating scales). The results of the questions are used to calculate two summary scores.
Time frame: Baseline up to 60 days after completion of study treatment
Using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Multiple Myeloma20 (EORTC QLQ - MY20). A repeated measures linear mixed model will be fit to all QOL scores. This incorporates four multi-item scales to assess disease symptoms, side effects of treatment, future perspective and body image. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high score for the symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology or problems, whereas a high score for the functional scale represents a high level of functioning.
Elvira Umyarova
Other
A Phase Ib Study of TGFbi NK Cells and Isatuximab for Myeloma Relapsed/Refractory to BCMA Targeting Therapy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03770260
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02101944
Anemia, Blood Protein Disorders
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02465060
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03798678
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial Details