Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06269887

Dominant Non-Dominant Upper Extremity in Gender

There are strength and functional differences between non-dominant and dominant extremities. This is important in the hand and extremity rehabilitation process. This situation also differs between genders. Comparison of the dominant and non-dominant limb can provide important clinical or rehabilitation field-related information. It is reported in the literature that manual dexterity, grip strength and joint position sense may differ between extremities. However, the relationship between this situation and the difference between genders has not been explained. It is thought that examining this difference can be extremely useful in determining achievable goals in hand rehabilitation and in customizing care for different groups.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–25 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Karabük University

Karabük, 78000, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Many treatment protocols compare the strength of the injured extremity to the uninjured extremity or compare it to normative data from the same group of individuals. There is controversy about the difference in grip strength between dominant and non-dominant hands in left- and right-hand dominant individuals. There is no study in the literature that evaluates the differences in muscle strength, joint position sense and upper extremity function skills between dominant and non-dominant upper extremities between genders. It is very important to include bilateral activity training in rehabilitation programs that aim to improve upper extremity mobility and speed. In addition, it will contribute to the accurate evaluation of activity and participation limitations, the determination of priorities, the selection of the right activity in task-specific and target-oriented treatment approaches, and the achievement of more effective results when integrated with technology-supported approaches. Therefore, the aim of our study is to fill this gap in the literature by comparing the differences between dominant and non-dominant upper extremities between genders.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being between the ages of 18-25
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Having trauma (fracture, dislocation) in the last year
  • Doing sports or activities that require bilateral activity (playing music, knitting, sports, etc.)
  • Being diagnosed with any neurological or orthopedic disease that will affect hand-eye coordination
  • Having had upper extremity surgery
  • Having any Botox injection in the last 6 months
  • Those who did not agree to participate in the study

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Hand Preference

    Time frame: First Day

    The Edinburgh Hand Preference Questionnaire questions individuals' hand use in daily living activities. The final total score is between 100 and -100. Individuals who score more than 40 points are right-hand; Individuals in this score range from 40 to -40 inclusive are recorded as ambidextrous, and individuals with scores of -40 points and below are left-handed

  2. Grip Strength

    Time frame: First Day

    Hand grip strength was measured using a standard Jamar Dynamometer.

  3. Joint Position Sense

    Time frame: First Day

    Proprioception was assessed by joint position sense (JPS) test. Shoulder JPS was assessed using a digital inclinometer

  4. Manual Dexterity

    Time frame: First Day

    The Purdue Pegboard Test was used to evaluate the functional skill levels of the upper extremities.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Karabuk University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Dominant and Non-Dominant Upper Extremity in Young Individuals

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Feb 21, 2024
Registry last updated
Jun 13, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.