Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02207972

Does Ultrasound Help With Placement of Labor Analgesia in Pregnant Patients?

The investigators believe that ultrasound guided CSE technique will accurately place the epidural needle in the midline position compared to epidural needle placement via palpation of anatomical landmarks. This will result in positive CSF in the spinal needle, correct placement of the catheter, and adequate symmetrical labor analgesia/anesthesia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–48 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mount-Sinai Roosevelt hospital

New York, 10019, United States

About this study

Epidurals provide superior labor analgesia and anesthesia. Unfortunately, failure of epidural anesthesia and analgesia is a frequent clinical problem. In a heterogeneous cohort of 2,140 surgical patients, a failure rate of 27% for lumbar epidural was described. However, the definition of a failed epidural is broad. Different definitions include insufficient analgesia to catheter dislodgement to conversion to general anesthesia. Epidural analgesia failures may result from technical difficulties, insufficiencies or overdosing of local anesthetics, epidural septum or midline adhesions, and placement of the epidural catheter through an intervertebral foramen or into the anterior epidural space. In an imaging study of failed epidurals, incorrect catheter placement accounted for half of the failures, while the remaining patients experienced suboptimal analgesia through a correctly positioned catheter.

The incidence of overall failure was lower in patients receiving combined spinal-epidural (CSE) catheters versus epidural analgesia. In one study, the CSE technique provided decreased failure rates for labor analgesia and comparable or decreased failure rates for surgical anesthesia, when compared with reported failure rates for epidural anesthesia. It is believed that positive CSF flow in the spinal needle confirms correct epidural needle placement in the epidural space and also confirms the epidural needle to be in the midline position. Placement of the epidural needle in the midline position will minimize the incorrect placement of the catheter to one side, providing a symmetrical analgesia versus unilateral analgesia.

However, the practice of CSE and epidural catheter placement relies on the palpation of anatomical landmarks that are not always easy to feel. Therefore, the epidural needle maybe placed "off midline" despite positive loss of resistance (LOR) that causes negative CSF flow in the spinal needle and an incorrectly placed catheter. As a result, the incorrect catheter placement will result in a "failed" or suboptimal epidural analgesia.

Ultrasound has recently been utilized to facilitate lumbar epidurals and spinals. The US imaging of the lumbar spine in different scanning planes facilitates the identification of the landmarks necessary for appropriate epidural space location in pregnant patients. There are two acoustic windows that are effective for lumbar spine sonographic assessment: one seen on the transverse approach, and the other seen on the longitudinal paramedian approach. The ultrasound single-screen method using the transverse approach of the lumbar spine provides reliable information regarding the landmarks required for labor epidurals. The correct interspace and midline position are identified for correct placement of the CSE analgesia.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Nulliparious
  • Term (>37 weeks gestation)
  • Vertex presentation
  • Singleton gestation
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Request for analgesia for labor pain
  • Maternal age 18 years or greater

Exclusion criteria

  • Multiparous
  • Preterm (< 37 weeks gestation)
  • Presentation other than vertex (breech, transverse)
  • Active drug/alcohol dependence
  • Previous spinal surgeries
  • Known spinal deformities

Treatment and study plan

Use of Ultrasound

Device

The ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in different scanning planes facilitates the identification of the landmarks necessary for appropriate epidural space location in pregnant patients. There are two acoustic windows that are effective for lumbar spine sonographic assessment: one seen on the transverse approach, and the other seen on the longitudinal paramedian approach. The ultrasound single-screen method using the transverse approach of the lumbar spine provides reliable information regarding the landmarks required for labor epidurals. The correct interspace and midline position are identified for correct placement of the CSE analgesia.

No ultrasound used

Procedure

Palpation of anatomical landmarks is used for placement of labor analgesia

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Accurate Epidural Placement

    Time frame: 2 hours

    Number of ultrasound guided CSE technique accurately placed epidural needle in the midline position

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Successful First Attempt

    Time frame: Immediate

    The number of participants who had first attempt success to locate the epidural space and midline position

  2. Number of Participants Without Angle Adjustments in Space Success

    Time frame: immediate

    the number of participants with successes without any readjustment of the angle in the space

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Does Ultrasound-guided CSE Technique Improve Midline Placement of Epidural Needle With Positive CSF Flow, Thereby Facilitating Correct Placement of the Catheter Compared to Catheter Placement Using Palpation of Anatomical Landmarks?

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Aug 4, 2014
Registry last updated
Feb 13, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.