Stockholm University
Stockholm, 10691, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT06149182
Functional somatic syndromes (e.g. irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia) and medically unexplained symptoms (e.g. chronic primary pain) are very common in primary care. These patients make 14 times more doctor visits than the general population, but describe themselves as less satisfied with the care they receive. Although Region Stockholm in Sweden recently developed care flows based on 'step up' care for the most common patient groups in primary care, patients with functional or medically unexplained symptoms are not mentioned.
Short-term psychodynamic therapies such as Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET) and Intensive Short Term Psychodynamic Therapy (ISTDP) have recently been evaluated in three systematic reviews and show good results for patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Short-term psychodynamic therapy considers that good treatment outcomes for patients with functional somatic syndromes can be achieved by increasing awareness of emotions and teaching patients to better experience, express and regulate emotions. In several randomized studies, short-term psychodynamic therapy has shown good effects even compared to other treatments, including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).
The overall purpose of this research project is to to evaluate psychodynamic emotion-focused interventions (EAET and ISTDP) for patients with medically unexplained symptoms and high health care consumption. The project includes several studies that will clarify effects and contribute to information on how care flows in primary care for the patient group can be created.
The research question for this specific study is:
Can a therapeutic interview (so-called "EAET life-stress interview") focusing on emotional factors in comparison to a psychiatric interview (so-called "basic assessment") contribute to increased interest in psychological treatment and reduction of physical and psychiatric symptoms in patients with medically unexplained symptoms with relatively high health care consumption? Does the order of interview interventions matter?
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Stockholm, 10691, Sweden
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This interview has the aim to jointly explore potential emotional factors contributing to patients functional somatic symptoms. While exploring this, it has the aim to not only describe such potential patterns but also emotionally process them.
This interview has the aim to gain enough information to diagnose some of the main psychiatric disorders
Time frame: Change from pre to follow up (6 weeks after interview)
Visual analogue scale 0-10 for symptom intensity and symptom interference. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning.
Time frame: Change from pre to follow up (6 weeks after interview)
Ratings 0-2 on how troublesome somatic symptoms are experienced. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning.
Time frame: Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview)
Visual analogue scale 0-10 for symptom intensity and symptom interference. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning.
Time frame: Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview)
Ratings 0-2 on how troublesome somatic symptoms are experienced. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning.
Time frame: Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview)
Ratings 0-3 on impact of depressive symptoms. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning.
Time frame: Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview)
Ratings 0-3 on impact of anxiety symptoms.Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning.
Time frame: Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview)
Ratings 0-4 on impact of post traumatic symptoms. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning.
Time frame: Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview)
Ratings on emotional (dys)regulation. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning.
Time frame: Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview)
Visual analogue scale 0-10 for symptom interference in daily life. Higher scores indicates worse symptom/functioning.
Time frame: Change from pre to post (within 1 week after interview) and follow up (6 weeks after interview)
Ratings on illness beliefs.
Daniel Maroti
Other
Does the First Interview Matter: A Randomized Trial Comparing Life Stress Interview Versus a Standard Psychiatric Intake Interview for Patients With Functional Somatic Disorder
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06682104
Functional Somatic Disorder, Functional Somatic Syndrome
Stockholm, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06301360
Functional Somatic Disorder, Functional Somatic Syndromes
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06025617
Bodily Distress Syndrome, Chronic Disease
Silkeborg, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07296406
Somatic Symptom Disorder
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial Details