Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00182468

Does Routine Screening for Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Health Care Settings do More Good Than Harm?

The purpose of the research is to evaluate whether routine screening for woman abuse in health care settings, as compared to no screening, does more good than harm. Recent reviews have identified the need for high quality research to understand 1) the actual impact on all women of instituting mass screening procedures to identify woman abuse and 2) the extent to which early identification through screening is effective in preventing or ameliorating important outcomes. The main outcomes for the study are reduction in violence, improvement in life quality, and potential harms of screening. A number of secondary outcomes to help understand the process by which screening and usual care might lead to changes in the primary outcomes will also be assessed.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–64 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Brantford Aboriginal Health Centre, Brantford, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18-64 years
  • Patients at the health care site
  • Able to participate in English
  • Able to separate from accompanying person(s)

Exclusion criteria

  • Too ill to participate
  • Unable to separate from accompanying person(s)
  • Unable to speak, read, or write English

Treatment and study plan

Screening for intimate partner violence

Other

Women are screened for intimate partner violence prior to seeing a health care provider.

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of intimate partner violence

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Health-specific quality of life

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. Harms of screening and/or usual care

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mental health (depression, post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD], anxiety, somatic complaints, substance use)

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Global physical and emotional health and well-being

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. Health services utilization

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. Safety behaviours

    Time frame: 18 months

  5. Use of information and resources

    Time frame: 18 months

  6. Child quality of life

    Time frame: 18 months

  7. Stage in process of identifying and resolving abuse

    Time frame: 18 months

  8. Exposure to maltreatment as a child

    Time frame: 18 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

McMaster University

Other

Collaborators

  • Echo: Improving Women's Health in Ontario (formerly Ontario Women's Health Council)

Registry information

Official study title

If, When and How to Ask the Question(s): Assessing Screening Approaches to Identifying Woman Abuse in Health Care Settings

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2008
First posted
Sep 16, 2005
Registry last updated
Sep 9, 2009

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.