The University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0T6, Canada
NCT Number: NCT00864084
The purpose of this study is to determine whether participation in pulmonary rehabilitation improves balance in people with respiratory disease.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0T6, Canada
Falls and chronic respiratory are two major health concerns affecting morbidity and mortality in older adults. Several factors that predispose falls, such as reduced balance, have been documented in people with respiratory disease. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs, which involve customized exercise prescription, are recommended to improve quality of life and disease management in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There are many documented benefits to participation in such programs; however, the impact on balance and other falls risk factors has not previously been investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a pulmonary rehabilitation program on balance and falls risk factors in individuals with respiratory disease. This study will enhance the current management of respiratory disease by improving our understanding of the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pulmonary rehabilitation involves the prescription of customized exercise programs and education on disease management.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks
Standing balance was measured using a force plate (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) from which centre of pressure (COP) trajectories were derived at a sampling frequency of 100Hz. Participants stood on the force plate during the following two conditions: normal stance (feet hip-width apart) with eyes open and eyes closed.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks
Dynamic balance was measured using the timed up and go (TUG) and Four Square Step Test (FSST). For the TUG, the time taken for the subject to stand from a chair, walk 3 m, turn around and return to the chair was recorded {Podsiadlo, 1991 #31}. Subjects were asked to do this as quickly and safely as possible. High test-retest reliability of the TUG has been reported in older community-dwelling individuals {Steffen, 2002 #34}. In the FSST, subjects were asked to step to four corners of a square in a clockwise and then counter-clockwise direction as quickly as possible {Dite, 2002 #1181}. The time taken to complete this circuit was recorded. This test has been shown to have high inter-rater and test-retest reliability {Dite, 2002 #1181}.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks
Standing balance was measured using a force plate (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) from which centre of pressure (COP) trajectories were derived at a sampling frequency of 100Hz. Participants stood on the force plate during the following two conditions: normal stance (feet hip-width apart) with eyes open and eyes closed.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks
Standing balance was measured using a force plate (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) from which centre of pressure (COP) trajectories were derived at a sampling frequency of 100Hz. Participants stood on the force plate during the following two conditions: normal stance (feet hip-width apart) with eyes open and eyes closed.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks
Activity-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale measures balance confidence during sixteen activities of progressive difficulty, such as going up and down stairs, reaching for objects and walking in crowded areas {Powell, 1995 #5}. It asks subjects to rate their level of confidence in performing an activity without losing balance on an 11-point scale ranging from 0% (no confidence) to 100% (completely confident). The score is calculated as the average score for each item. This questionnaire has been shown to be sensitive to detect changes in function following rehabilitation {Myers, 1998 #6} and has proven internal consistency and test-retest reliability {Powell, 1995 #5}.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks
The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FESI) assesses fear of falling during a range of physical and social activities {Yardley, 2005 #1}. It asks about an individual's concern about the possibility of following during participation in sixteen common activities, such as cleaning the house, ascending and descending stairs and walking in various environmental conditions. Answers range from 1, "not at all" concerned, to 4, "very" concerned, on a 4-point scale, and score is calculated as the average response. This questionnaire has been shown to have excellent internal and test-retest reliability {Yardley, 2005 #1}.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-pulmonary rehabilitation) and follow-up (post-pulmonary rehabilitation) at 8 weeks
The COPD Self-Efficacy Scale evaluates level of confidence in ability to manage or avoid breathing difficulty during a range of situations such as feeling frustrated and lifting heavy objects {Wigal, 1991 #3}. Possible answers range from "very confident" (5 points) to "not at all confident" (1 point) and the average score per question is calculated. This scale has been shown to have excellent internal consistency and good test-retest reliability.
University of Manitoba
Other
Does a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program Improve Balance in Individuals With Respiratory Disease?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07552779
COVID-19, COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019)
Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT04776447
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma Bronchiogenic Stage III
Alicante, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06728709
Gynecologic Cancer, Lung Diseases
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03250897
Lung Diseases, Respiratory Tract Diseases
Rennes, France
View Trial Details