Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01101282

Does Positive Expiratory Pressure Mask Therapy Improve Recovery From Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?

This study aims to identify whether the addition of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy to standard medical care improves clinically important outcomes in individuals with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is hypothesized that those who receive the additional PEP mask therapy will show greater improvements than those who do not.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This study aims to identify whether the addition of positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy to standard medical care improves symptoms, quality of life and risk of re-exacerbation in individuals with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

A PEP mask is a small hand-held device that is self-applied over the nose and mouth. It creates a resistance against exhalation (outward) breaths which helps facilitate movement of sputum from the lungs towards the mouth.

Participants will be recruited from two tertiary metropolitan hospitals in Melbourne, Australia and randomised to receive either 'usual care' (comprising medical management, non-invasive ventilation if required, rehabilitation and allied health interventions) or 'usual care' plus PEP mask therapy for the duration of their hospital admission. All participants will then complete daily diaries for six months after discharge.

The effect of PEP mask therapy will be evaluated using a range of outcomes important to both patients and health care providers.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(all of the following criteria must be met):

  • The primary reason for hospital admission is an acute exacerbation of clinically diagnosed COPD
  • There is evidence of sputum expectoration or they are a chronic sputum producer ('regularly expectorates sputum on most days')
  • They are able and willing to provide written, informed consent
  • Recent (within the last 6 months) lung function data indicates obstructive lung disease (of any severity), according to the GOLD criteria: post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 (only if available)
  • They have a smoking history of ≥ 10 pack/years (only if diagnosis unclear)

Exclusion criteria

(none of the following criteria must be present):

  • They are breathing via an artificial airway (e.g. endotracheal or tracheostomy tube)
  • They have a more significant respiratory disease other than COPD (e.g. primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, asthma, lung cancer)
  • They have had recent (within the last 6 months) lung volume reduction procedure(s) (e.g. surgery, valve or stent insertion, or other), lung transplantation or pneumonectomy
  • The intervention is contraindicated (including but not limited to evidence of undrained pneumothorax, significant frank haemoptysis, recent facial, oral, oesophageal or skull surgery/trauma, altered conscious state or inability to co-operate)
  • They have poor oxygen saturation at rest (SpO2 < 88%) despite supplemental oxygen delivered via nasal prongs
  • They intend to continue performing established ACT routines throughout the study period
  • It is more than 48 hours since being admitted as an inpatient to hospital.

Treatment and study plan

Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask therapy

Device

PEP mask therapy will be performed once/day, supervised, by an experienced physiotherapist until hospital discharge or ≥ 24 hours without sputum expectoration (whichever comes first). Written instructions shall also be provided, encouraging two more independent PEP mask sessions per day. Each session will comprise up to 5 cycles of 8-10 slightly active breaths, followed by 2 huffs (FET) and 2 coughs. A target pressure of 10-20 cms H20 during the middle of expiration shall be used (monitored via a pressure manometer).

Primary outcomes

  1. Symptom severity

    Time frame: Within 48 hours of presenting to hospital (day 1)

    Measured via the Breathlessness, Cough and Sputum Scale (BCSS).

  2. Symptom severity

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)

    Measured via the BCSS

  3. Symptom severity

    Time frame: 8 weeks following hospital discharge

    Measured via the BCSS

  4. Symptom severity

    Time frame: 6 months following hospital discharge

    Measured via the BCSS

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disease-specific quality of life

    Time frame: Within 48 hours of presenting to hospital (day 1)

    Measured via the 4-week English (Australian) version of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).

  2. Disease-specific quality of life

    Time frame: 8 weeks following hospital discharge

    Measured via the SGRQ

  3. Disease-specific quality of life

    Time frame: 6 months following hospital discharge

    Measured via the SGRQ

  4. Need for assisted (non-invasive and/or invasive) ventilation during hospitalisation (within, and after 48 hours of presentation to hospital)

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)

    The number of participants needing non-invasive or invasive ventilation during their inpatient stay shall be assessed. As early non-invasive ventilation is commonly used for the management of acute exacerbations of COPD, this outcome shall be assessed both within and after 48 hours of presentation to hospital. This aims to differentiate usual care from clinical deterioration.

  5. Hospital length of stay

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)

    Measured as number of days

  6. Time to first exacerbation

    Time frame: 6 months following hospital discharge

    Measured as number of days

  7. Time to first hospitalisation (due to respiratory illness)

    Time frame: 6 months following hospital discharge

    Measured as number of days

  8. Number of acute exacerbations

    Time frame: 6 months following hospital discharge

    Measured as number of events

  9. Number of hospitalisations (due to respiratory illness)

    Time frame: 6 months following hospital discharge

    Measured as number of events

  10. Total number of hospitalised days

    Time frame: 6 months following hospital discharge

    Measured as number of hospitalised days

  11. Lung function (spirometry)

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)

    e.g. FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC%

  12. Lung function (spirometry)

    Time frame: 6 months following hospital discharge

    e.g. FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC%

  13. Mortality (actual, all cause)

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)

    Measured as number of events

  14. Mortality (actual, all cause)

    Time frame: 6 months following hospital discharge

    Measured as number of events

  15. Mortality (predicted)

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (up to approx. day 10)

    Measured via calculation of the BODE index. The BODE index is derived from: Body mass index, Obstruction severity (spirometry), Dyspnoea (MRC dyspnoea scale) and Exercise tolerance (6 minute walk test).

  16. Mortality (predicted)

    Time frame: 6 months following hospital discharge

    Measured via BODE index

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

La Trobe University

Other

Collaborators

  • Austin Hospital, Melbourne Australia
  • The Alfred

Registry information

Official study title

Does the Addition of Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP) Mask Therapy to Usual Medical Care Improve Patients' Symptoms, Quality or Life and Risk of Future Exacerbations in Individuals With Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)?

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Apr 9, 2010
Registry last updated
Feb 15, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.