Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03506282

Does Listening to Music Alter the Running Mechanics?

The purpose of this study is to determine whether in healthy subjects listening to music while running influences the ground pressure forces, the vertical loading and, overall, the running biomechanics.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–35 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The analysis of the effects that listening to music may exert during exercise has been the topic of a number of scientific articles. Overall, these studies documented how music influences performance and they generally observed positive effects. The majority of the investigations were carried out in the aerobic/endurance domain where music was found to enhance running performance and is also likely to accelerate heart rate recovery after strenuous exercise, albeit not all the authors agree on this point. It has been also reported that loud music not only enhances optimal exercising, but also interacts with music tempo to yield significant additional performance benefits.

Despite such interesting findings, the focus of these investigations was restricted to characterize the physiological responses that individuals exhibit when listening to music during physical activity, mainly running. Thus, the studies ended up with positive results, that is, increased performance, or failed in showing any effect.

Beside the above reported positive effects of music some potentially negative effects should be considered. First, regardless of whether running is included or not in the experimental condition, exposure to high levels of noise/sound even for short periods of time can be damaging for the auditory system, possibly resulting in hearing loss or impairment. This topic has been scrutinized by a number of studies, with a specific attention to adolescent populations who are exposed to high risk of hearing problems due to the massive usage of listening devices. Although this is a crucial issue, such source of hazard can be adequately controlled for by firmly sticking to the guidelines on the recommended exposure limits (REL), which is recommended by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The REL has been set at 85 decibels (dB) for a maximum of 8 hours. Increasing the volume by rate of 3 dB increases the risk exponentially. For instance, a noise corresponding to an intensity of 88 dB should not exceed an exposure of 4 hours, then 91 dB 2 hours, 94 dB 1 hour, 97 dB 30 minutes, 100 dB 15 minutes, 103 dB 7.5 minutes, 106 dB 3.7 minutes and so on, up to 140 dB, which must not be provided at all.

Surprisingly, to date and to our knowledge, the influence that listening to music with portable devices and earphones may exert on the amount of vertical force upon impact loading during running has not been investigated yet.

Unlike the considerable number of previous works which were focused on the physiological and psychological responses to music during exercise, no references that attempted to address the biomechanical consequences of music listening on impact loading and jogging/running mechanics could be traced in the literature. Therefore, our main goal is to fill this gap in the existing literature.

Considering the universal widespread and popularity of running and that approximately 47 million Americans participated in running activities in the last decade, the findings generated by this research would be highly relevant to the broad field of sports medicine and exercise science.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy subjects
  • Age 18-35 years
  • Level of fitness: Moderate level (ACTIVE) according to the classification of the American College of Sports Medicine depicting "Moderate" as either of the following 3 criteria:
  • 3 or more days of vigorous activity of at least 20 minutes per day OR
  • 5 or more days of moderate-intensity activity and/or walking of at least 30 minutes per day OR
  • 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate-intensity or vigorous intensity activities achieving a minimum of at least 600 metabolic equivalents (METs) per week.
  • able to run on a treadmill safely and without bilateral or unilateral support.

Exclusion criteria

  • Past or present diseases of the auditory and vestibular system (as assessed by otolaryngological and audiometric examinations).
  • Traumatology/orthopedic conditions that contraindicate treadmill training.

Treatment and study plan

Running while listening to a traffic audio track

Other

While running three 2-minute sets at different velocities (6, 8 and 10 km/h, respectively) on a sensorized treadmill, each participant will be exposed via earphones to an audio track resembling average outdoor conditions (70 dB).

Other names: Traffic audio track

Running with music at moderate volume

Other

While running three 2-minute sets at different velocities (6, 8 and 10 km/h, respectively) on a sensorized treadmill, each participant will be provided the same music track ("We take care of our own", by Bruce Springsteen from the "Wrecking Ball" album, 2012). The music track will be given at a moderate volume (80 dB).

Other names: Music at moderate volume

Running with music at moderate-to-high volume

Other

While running three 2-minute sets at different velocities (6, 8 and 10 km/h, respectively) on a sensorized treadmill, each participant will be provided the same music track ("We take care of our own", by Bruce Springsteen from the "Wrecking Ball" album, 2012). The music track will be given at a moderate-to-high volume (85 dB).

Other names: Music at moderate-to-high volume

Primary outcomes

  1. Average ground pressure force

    Time frame: It will be assessed for each participant and for each arm of the study during the three 2-minute runs on the treadmill through study completion, an average of 1 year.

    This outcome expresses the mean amount of impact recorded by the force plates embedded in the treadmill.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peak ground pressure force

    Time frame: It will be assessed for each participant and for each arm of the study during the three 2-minute runs on the treadmill through study completion, an average of 1 year.

    This outcome expresses the highest amount of impact recorded by the force plates embedded in the treadmill.

  2. Average vertical loading rate

    Time frame: It will be assessed for each participant and for each arm of the study during the three 2-minute runs on the treadmill through study completion, an average of 1 year.

    This outcome expresses the vertical oscillation of the center of mass and is considered highly linked to the risk of injury.

  3. Stride length

    Time frame: It will be assessed for each participant and for each arm of the study during the three 2-minute runs on the treadmill through study completion, an average of 1 year.

    The stride length is the distance between two successive placements of the same foot.

  4. Stride time

    Time frame: It will be assessed for each participant and for each arm of the study during the three 2-minute runs on the treadmill through study completion, an average of 1 year.

    It is the time elapsed between the first contact of two consecutive footsteps of the same foot and is expressed in milliseconds.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Manca Andrea, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+39 079228154

Michele Felisatti, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+39 349 8054363

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Università degli Studi di Sassari

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Effects of Listening to Music During Running on Ground Contact Forces and Running Mechanics: the "IMPACT Factor" Trial

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 24, 2018
Registry last updated
Apr 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.