Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01935180

Does Cap Assisted Colonoscopy Improve Detection of Adenomatous Polyps? (CAP Trial)

Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in cancer prevention relies on the detection and removal of adenomatous polyps. However, a substantial rate of adenomas is missed during a colonoscopy. It has been estimated that two thirds of missed adenomas are located on the proximal aspect of colonic folds. Attaching a transparent cap to the tip of a colonoscope may allow examination of the proximal aspect of colonic folds, and some early studies have suggested an increased polyp and adenoma detection using this technology. However, the studies have in part substantial methodological limitations (e.g. missing polyp histology, single endoscopist study, polyps not removed at the time of detection). Therefore, at this point it is unclear whether cap assisted colonoscopy may improve adenoma detection. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether cap assisted colonoscopy improves adenoma detection.

The investigators propose a two-center multiple endoscopists randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to cap assisted colonoscopy or standard high definition white light colonoscopy. The cap is a 4mm commercially available transparent cap that is attached to the tip of the colonoscopy. Primary outcome measure is the adenoma detection rate (mean number of adenoma per patient). The investigators will assess and adjust for possible variables that can affect adenoma detection, including withdrawal time and quality of colon preparation. As a secondary outcome of interest the investigators will evaluate a possible learning curve effect among all endoscopists (a minimum of six) new to this method. In addition the investigators will evaluate whether cap assisted endoscopy improves real time prediction of polyp histology.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

All patients who present for a colonoscopy and meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be asked to participate (see inclusion and exclusion criteria). All patients will undergo a regular bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol lavage (based on current standard of care) until clear rectal fluid is evacuated. Patients will be randomized to one of two groups:

  • Standard colonoscopy, or
  • Cap assisted colonoscopy. All colonoscopies will be performed using state of the art high-definition wide angle colonoscopy. The transparent cap, which is attached to the tip of the colonoscope, has a 4mm margin extending beyond the tip of the colonoscope. All patients will undergo a careful endoscopic examination. A timer will provide feedback on the time of insertion and the withdrawal time. Detected polyps will be assessed with standard white light and narrow band imaging to predict polyp histology (adenoma versus no adenoma), then resected and sent for histological evaluation according to standard of care. At least 8 experienced endoscopists at the participating centers will participate. Each endoscopist will perform at least 50 cap assisted colonoscopies as part of the study. Each endoscopist will be asked to complete a survey after 10 and after 50 cap assisted colonoscopies.

Patients will be randomized in blocks of four allocated to each examiner. The order of randomization will be computer generated. Information on randomization will be contained in sealed envelopes assigned to each examiner and individually opened immediately before the procedure after a patient's All participating endoscopist will fill out a questionnaire regarding the use of cap assistance colonoscopy after the initial 10 cap assisted colonoscopies and after at least 50 cap assisted cap colonoscopies. Endoscopists will also undergo a training session with respect to real time polyp diagnosis before study commencement and after each 20 colonoscopies enrollment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Any patient ≥ 50 years old and < 85 years old who presents for a colonoscopy with a potential for polyp resection and who does not meet any of the exclusion criteria mentioned below will be asked to participate

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with known inflammatory bowel disease or active colitis
  • Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis or other genetic syndromes that are associated with a high number of colonic polyps
  • Patients who are receiving an emergency colonoscopy
  • Poor general health (ASA class > 3)
  • Patients on coumadin at the time of the procedure or with a coagulopathy and an elevated INR ≥ 1.5, or platelets < 50
  • Patients who do not consent

Treatment and study plan

Colonoscopy Cap

Device

4mm transparent cap (Olympus) mounted to the tip of a colonoscope.

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Number of Adenomas

    Time frame: duration of colonoscopy

    Mean number of adenomas per patient in each group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adenoma Detection Rate

    Time frame: duration of colonoscopy

    • Adenoma detection rate (ADR), % of patients with at least 1 adenoma
  2. Advanced Adenoma Detection Rate

    Time frame: duration of colonoscopy

    Proportion of patients with advanced adenomas

  3. Quality of Bowel Preparation

    Time frame: duration of colonoscopy

    Proportion of patients with a bowel preparation that was rated as good or excellent (four point scale that distinguishes the bowel prep as poor, fair, good or excellent).

  4. Withdrawal Time

    Time frame: time of colonoscope withdrawal

    • Time taken for the withdrawal of the colonoscope from the cecum to anus among patients, who did not have any polyps.
  5. Ease of Terminal Ileum Intubation

    Time frame: during colonoscopy

    • Proportion of patients, for whom intubation of the terminal ileum with the colonoscope was rated as "easy". Intubation could be rated by the endoscopist as "easy", "slightly difficult", "difficult", or "unable to intubate".
  6. Real Time Prediction of Polyp Histology

    Time frame: duration of colonoscopy

    Difference in recommended surveillance interval between real time polyp diagnosis and pathological diagnosis among patients with at least one diminutive polyp

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Fed

Collaborators

  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Registry information

Acronym: CAP

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Sep 4, 2013
Registry last updated
Sep 25, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.