Whipps Cross Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust
London, E11 1NR, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT03985111
'Hypothesis-generating' study to assess whether the presence of a central venous line significantly affects the volumes of fluid infused perioperatively in major elective colorectal surgery
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
London, E11 1NR, United Kingdom
There are several indications for elective central venous cannulation in major colorectal surgery, particularly in those at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. These include: the ability to infuse certain vasoactive medications, monitor central venous pressure, allow for frequent blood sampling, and provide a route of access for total parenteral nutrition(1). Furthermore, there has been a great deal of recent interest in whether there are improved outcomes with restrictive as opposed to liberal fluid therapy in major abdominal surgery(2), and, similarly, with individualised, rather than generic, blood pressure management in major surgery(3). However, there have been no major studies to date examining whether the simple act of electively inserting a central venous catheter prior to the start of surgery influences the volume of fluid infused and the use of vasopressors perioperatively.
The RELIEF trial reported that modestly liberal perioperative fluid regimens conferred no greater disability-free survival benefit over restrictive regimens, but are likely to reduce rates of acute kidney injury(2). This contrasts with the restrictive protocols championed by various Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs(4). Previous works have suggested that not only does adherence to ERAS principles lead to superior patient outcomes, but some have gone further in identifying restriction of intravenous fluids perioperatively to be one of the few interventions that independently predicts a better outcome(5). One of the advantages of central venous catheterisation is the ability to administer drugs in smaller volumes of fluid. Therefore, given the intensity of the debate surrounding restrictive and liberal regimens, it should be investigated whether the availability of central venous access impacts upon the volumes of fluid infused.
Furthermore, central venous catheterisation is unlikely just to have an impact via the avoidance of inadvertent larger volume infusion, which is sometimes seen with drug administration through a peripheral line. The RELIEF trial reported that the patient cohort managed with a restrictive fluid regimen were more likely to receive vasopressor support, compared with those receiving a liberal regimen(2). The presence of a central venous catheter enables the use of potent vasopressor agents, such as noradrenaline, which will further influence fluid administration, by introducing a second therapeutic option for correcting perioperative hypotension. The importance of 'tight' blood pressure control has been demonstrated by the INPRESS trial, which showed a reduction in post-operative organ dysfunction with individualised blood pressure management, over standard management strategies(3). This is of particular importance, as evidence has shown that cardiac output-directed fluid therapy should not lead to 'excessive fluid administration, but may lead to a more individualised approach to achieving the correct dose of fluid'(6), and may require concomitant use of vasoactive agents.
Thus, the investigators have set out to investigate whether the elective insertion of a central venous catheter prior to the start of major colorectal surgery, influences the volumes, and types, of fluid infused, as well as the use and mean dose of vasopressor agents, intra-operatively and for the first 12 hours post-operatively.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria will be all adult patients presenting for elective major colorectal surgery (resection), whom are to be electively admitted to critical care directly from theatre.
Exclusion criteria
Insertion of a central venous catheter insertion pre-operatively (electively)
Time frame: Intra-operatively (from induction to leaving theatre)
To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the volume of intravenous fluid infused intra-operatively
Time frame: The first 12 hours post-operatively (commencing from the arrival on the critical care unit, until the end of the 12th post-operative hour)
To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the volume of intravenous fluid infused post-operatively
Time frame: From admission to intensive care, until stepdown to the ward (and until the expected end of study on 30th April 2020)
Does the presence of a central venous catheter alter length of post-operative stay on the Intensive Care Unit
Time frame: From induction of anaesthesia until the end of the 12th post-operative hour
To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the volume of blood products infused peri-operatively
Time frame: From induction of anaesthesia until the end of the 12th post-operative hour
To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the mean dose of any required vasopressor agents peri-operatively
Time frame: From induction of anaesthesia until the end of the 12th post-operative hour
To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter, and any ensuing fluid and blood pressure management strategies, influence the use of cardiac output monitoring equipment peri-operatively
Time frame: From the day of the procedure until discharge from the hospital (and until the expected end of study on 30th April 2020)
To assess whether the presence of a central venous catheter influences the total post-operative length of stay
Barts & The London NHS Trust
Other
In High Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resection, Does Routine Placement of a Central Venous Catheter Reduce Peri-operative Fluid Administration in Theatre and the Critical Care Unit?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07517848
Colo-rectal Cancer, Colonic Diseases
Manisa, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06434727
Colorectal Disorders, Thoracic
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05262296
Colorectal Disorders
Milton Keynes, Bucks, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT03411096
Colorectal Disorders, Loop Ileostomy
Daegu, South Korea
View Trial Details