Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07679620

Disseminating Effective Sexual Health Programs in Schools Using iCHAMPSS

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of iCHAMPSS 2.0 in impacting Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) implementation outcomes, with implementation of a sexual health evidence-based program (EBP) assess iCHAMPSS 2.0's efficacy in impacting determinants of sexual health EBP implementation and to conduct a process evaluation to monitor iCHAMPSS 2.0 implementation, reach, dosage, and barriers and facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 during the study.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Sexual Health Education

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Licensed educator or administrator who holds one of the following positions: 1) district or school administrator (e.g., health coordinators, instructional specialists, and curriculum coordinators), 2) health and physical education teachers, and 3) social and health service staff (e.g., nurses and counselors) in a Texas school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Exclusion criteria

  • not holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder, OR holding a job in a Texas school district as a school stakeholder but not in a school district participating in the iCHAMPSS 2.0 study

Treatment and study plan

iCHAMPSS 2.0

Behavioral

iCHAMPSS 2.0 is designed for Program Champions, critical to EBP use, such as district and school administrators, SHAC members (which include parents), and health and physical education teachers, who are highly motivated to promote sexual health education.

iCHAMPSS 2.0 has four features:

  • the CHAMPSS Model tutorial, which familiarizes Champions with the iCHAMPSS 2.0 system
  • a Staging Tool, which helps Champions understand their school's level of readiness to adopt, implement, and maintain a sexual health EBP, and can tailor their experience
  • a tools library, which includes a suite of over 60 decision support tools
  • an interactive linkage system, which is an online platform to help Champions connect with others and to receive technical assistance (TA)

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in percentage of schools within a district implementing an EBP

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

  2. Rate of implementation of the EBP

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have recommended a sexual health EBP to their school board

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

  2. Percentage of School Health Advisory Councils (SHACs) that have adopted a sexual health EBP to their school board

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

  3. Percentage of schools with the school board's approval of an Evidence Based Program (EBP)

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

  4. Percentage of schools with the principal's approval of an EBP

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

  5. Percentage of students receiving majority (over 50%) of a sexual health EBP

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

  6. Percentage of schools that have implemented the evidence-based program for more than one academic year as assessed by the implementation survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

  7. Change in perceived complexity as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 3 item questionnaire and each is scored form (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 15, higher score indicating worse outcome

  8. Change in compatibility as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree maximum score 25, higher score indicating better outcome

  9. Change in relative advantage as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score of 20, higher score indicating better better outcome

  10. Change in perceived social systems support in parent community as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 8 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) not at all supportive to (4) very supportive , maximum score of 32 , higher score indicating better outcome

  11. Change in presence of school policy as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 2 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 10, higher score indicating better outcome

  12. Change in adequate resources as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 5 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 25, higher score indicating better outcome

  13. Change in presence of a program champion as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome

  14. Change in implementation climate as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 6 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score of 30, higher score indicating better outcome

  15. Change in inter organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome

  16. Change in intra organizational relationships as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(strongly disagree) -5(strongly agree), maximum score 20, higher score indicating better outcome

  17. Change in perceived need as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored from (1) Strongly disagree to (5) Strongly agree, maximum score range of 20, higher score indicating worse outcome

  18. Change in self-efficacy as assessed by the staff survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of intervention period (about 20 to 30 months from baseline)

    This is a 19 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(not at all confident)-4(very confident) , maximum score range of 76, higher score indicating better outcome

  19. Frequency of use of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics

    Time frame: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

  20. Time spent using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the district coordinator survey

    Time frame: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

    This will be reported categorically as less than one hour, 1-2 hours, 3-4 hours, 5-6 hours and 7 hours or more

  21. Number of recurring users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics

    Time frame: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

  22. Number of unique users of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics

    Time frame: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

  23. Mean number of users per school district of iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics

    Time frame: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

  24. Percentage of school districts/schools using iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the website analytics

    Time frame: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

  25. Percentage of iCHAMPSS 2.0 tools used in each step as assessed by the website analytics

    Time frame: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

  26. Perceived barriers to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys

    Time frame: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

    This will be reported as a percentage

  27. Perceived facilitators to implementing iCHAMPSS 2.0 as assessed by the coordinator interviews and district coordinator surveys

    Time frame: From baseline to end of school year (about 7 to 12 months from baseline)

    This will be reported as a percentage

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Belinda Hernandez, PhD, MPH

CONTACT

[email protected]

(210) 276-9009

Laura Thormaehlen

CONTACT

[email protected]

(713) 500-9000

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Other

Collaborators

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jul 1, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 1, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.