Ain Shams University Hospitals
Cairo, 11511, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07516535
Kidney stones are a common health problem and may recur frequently, which can affect quality of life and kidney function. Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive treatment used for renal stones, but treatment of medium-sized stones may be associated with longer operative time, impaired visibility during surgery, residual stone fragments, and postoperative infectious complications caused by increased intrarenal pressure.
Suction-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) techniques have been developed to improve surgical efficiency and safety by facilitating continuous removal of stone fragments and helping control intrarenal pressure. Two commonly used suction-assisted approaches are direct in-scope suction (DISS) and flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS). However, there is limited prospective randomized evidence directly comparing these two techniques.
This randomized prospective clinical study aims to compare direct in-scope suction (DISS) versus flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) in adult patients with medium-sized renal stones measuring 2 to 3 cm who are undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two suction-assisted techniques. The study will evaluate whether flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) provides better outcomes than direct in-scope suction (DISS) in terms of stone-free rate and postoperative infection rate.
The primary outcome is stone-free status assessed by postoperative imaging. Secondary outcomes include operative time, intraoperative visibility, and postoperative complications, particularly infection and urosepsis. The study hypothesis is that suction-assisted retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using the flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath (FANS) technique will result in a higher stone-free rate and a lower postoperative infection rate compared with direct in-scope suction (DISS) in the management of medium-sized renal stones.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 11511, Egypt
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Direct suction is applied through the working channel of the flexible ureteroscope during retrograde intrarenal surgery to facilitate evacuation of stone fragments and improve intraoperative visibility during laser lithotripsy.
Other names: DISS
A flexible and navigable suction ureteric access sheath is used during retrograde intrarenal surgery to provide suction-assisted evacuation of stone fragments, improve visibility, and support intrarenal pressure control during laser lithotripsy.
Other names: FANS
Time frame: At 1 month after surgery
Stone-free status will be assessed by postoperative imaging using kidney, ureter, and bladder radiography and non-contrast computed tomography. Clinically insignificant residual fragments will be defined as residual fragments measuring 2 to 3 millimeters or less.
Time frame: Within 1 month after surgery
The proportion of participants who develop any postoperative infectious complications.
Time frame: During surgery (Intraoperatively)
Operative time measured in minutes from ureteroscope insertion to successful placement of the double-J ureteral stent.
Time frame: During surgery (Intraoperatively)
Intraoperative visibility will be graded by the operating surgeon using a 3-point scale: grade 0 for poor visibility, grade 1 for moderate visibility, and grade 2 for good visibility.
Time frame: Within 1 month after surgery
The proportion of participants with postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ain Shams University
Other
The Impact of Suction-Assisted RIRS (DISS Versus FANS) on Postoperative Infection Rate and Stone-Free Rate After Treatment of Medium Sized Renal Stones
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07535281
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Gandong-gu, Outside U.S./Canada, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07712861
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Buenos Aires, Argentina
View Trial DetailsNCT07705646
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07514351
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details